Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: The Hesitation To Trade Willingham

  1. #1
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,443
    Twitter
    @twinsgeek
    Like
    1
    Liked 164 Times in 96 Posts
    Blog Entries
    241

    The Hesitation To Trade Willingham

    I'm not totally opposed to trading away Josh Willingham, but I do think people are underestimating just how rarely the Twins have been able to find a right-handed slugger like him. If I was going to do a story on this (I still might) each of these points might make a nice paragraph, but I'll throw them out there an let you react to them.

    1. When was the last time the Twins had a right-handed slugger like Willingham? I would posit that it was 1988, when they traded away Bruno for Tommy Herr. Since then, Hunter and Cuddy have been close, and both had a middle of the lineup presence and both left for much better money.
    2. When the Twins have Mauer and Morneau, both left-handed hitting, I can't blame them for trying like hell to have that guy on the roster. (If Parmelee replaces Morneau, that doesn't change things.)
    3. That was the whole reason for trading for Delmon Young.
    4. It's even more important than it has been for the last 25 years because they now play in Target field, and right-handed pull hitters are seemingly the one hitter that can thrive there.

    I understand that people want to treat Willingham as a stock and "Sell High" but it's not a great analogy. It's not like he can just be moved to a similar stock - there just aren't a lot of guys with that kind of pull power ont he market.

    About the only way I can justify moving him is that the Twins need to rebuild for the next TWO years, and if that's the road we think we need to travel, than there are whole lot of other moves that need to be looked at too, like targeting a whole bunch of AA-AAA pitching prospects.

  2. #2
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,713
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 564 Times in 369 Posts
    If you refuse to trade big time prospects, and your largest free agent signing is 7 million per year, and you have no pitchers in the minors coming up 2-4 years from now, how do you get better if you do not trade veterans?

  3. #3
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,994
    Like
    4
    Liked 124 Times in 90 Posts
    Blog Entries
    67
    I agree with you this time, John! At the very least I would wait until trade deadline. This is just such a rare occurrence for the Twins (and I don't trust Plouffe to repeat).

  4. #4
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,293
    Like
    32
    Liked 134 Times in 82 Posts
    Willingham will be 34 opening day, is injury prone and is only signed for two more years. given how unlikely it is that the Twins can compete in 2013 I think you trade Willy IF there is a solid deal out there. I would take a 2nd Alex Meyer if teams match up. someone like Delgado, cingrani or Corcino would be a good start. Minor or Hellickson would also work since it would give the Twins a solid starter for 5 years vs a very good hitter for 2.

  5. #5
    Twins Moderator MVP Riverbrian's Avatar
    Posts
    8,767
    Like
    4,851
    Liked 2,297 Times in 1,289 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    It all depends on what you get. I'd love to see Willingham in a Twins Uniform for the duration of his contract. However, If Willingham is on pace for 30 plus homers again this year at the trade deadline. Wouldn't that increase his value? If the Twins are in it... We will want that bat in our lineup... If we are not in it... We would love to see the increase in value for a trade in the future.

    We have people who worry that Willingham is going to regress... I understand that worry and it sure would suck but what if he doesn't regress.

    I'd trade him now if we got some nice pitching in return but if it isn't enough... Let's let him swing the bat here and see what happens maybe it gets better.

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,293
    Like
    32
    Liked 134 Times in 82 Posts
    I don't think Willingham will regress. there's a decent chance that he gets injured again and has very little value at the deadline. And he's the only current Twin that is going to land another legit prospect. Trading the other spare parts on the team will net a pile of Pedro Hernandez's. that's not what the club needs long term.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    748
    Like
    28
    Liked 61 Times in 48 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Willingham stays no doubt about it. this team doesn't have enough power as it is.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    399
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    I think with todays trade of Span for a High A prospect the Twins are in BUILD FOR THE FUTURE MODE and so i would say with Willingham's stock as high as its going to be (which isnt higher than Span's) That their is probably a greater chance now the Twins will trade him. Same goes with Morneau.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    748
    Like
    28
    Liked 61 Times in 48 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    also lets wait and see what other moves are made for our rotation this year. I was expecting a MLB ready pitcher in return for Span as he is a poor mans Bourn and will make approximately half what bourn makes the next 3 years.

  10. #10
    I definitely agree. Unless the Twins are definitely in rebuilding mode or get an incredible pitching return for Willingham, then you don't deal him in this offseason. At the trade deadline if the team's out of contention or next offseason may be another story.

    Willingham has been the right-handed slugger the Twins have been searching for for years. I agree with the sell-high idea, but that applies to someone like Delmon Young who, I guess, decided to dedicate himself to the game for some time in 2010 and put up good numbers and contribute. Sell high on players that you don't think have the ability or commitment to sustain the success. Liriano after 2010 is another example. Willingham was very solid in 2012 and 2011, and is somewhat of a late bloomer. As long as injuries don't hamper him in 2013, then I don't see why he can't replicate either of his last two seasons.

    If a team offers good quality pitching for Willingham, then you'd have to consider the deal. Based on what Phil Mackey from 1500 reported a few weeks ago, another executive said that the Twins would be lucky to get a #3 starter for Willingham at this point. If that's truly the case, then why deal him when you need his offense in the lineup?

  11. #11
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,293
    Like
    32
    Liked 134 Times in 82 Posts
    The Twins are going to be bad in 2013 realistically so what he does in 2013 doesn't matter for this particular team. By far their #1 need short term and long term is pitching and if the Twins can land another borderline top 50 prospect then I am all for trading Willy.

    i would feel a lot more optimistic about the future with the the following set of prospects
    Meyer
    another good pitching prospect like Cingrani/Corcino/Delgado
    Gibson
    berrios
    #4 pick which is currently looking like a college pitcher

  12. #12
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    145
    Like
    0
    Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts

    Trade Him

    If Willingham or a package that he headlines could bring us a Teheran, Delgado, Hellickson or Moore, or someone along those lines, I'd make that move in a New York minute. Hopefully Ryan would too. Let's face it, the guy will be 34 on opening day and is coming off by far the most productive two-year stretch of his 9-year career. He's has only downside in front of him. His reasonable contract could inspire someone on the verge of contention to overpay, but even a repeat of last seasons numbers isn't gonna make the Twins a contender. A starting pitcher who was at least adequate, even if we end up with Arcia, Hicks or Benson in LF (or a bargain basement veteran) would make a more positive impact on our record than running Willingham out there again next season.

  13. #13
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,293
    Like
    32
    Liked 134 Times in 82 Posts
    0% chance on Moore

  14. #14
    Senior Member Triple-A raindog's Avatar
    Posts
    298
    Like
    45
    Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
    I'm just stating the obvious here, but it all depends on what we can get it return. The Twins shouldn't feel like they have to dump the guy. He's very valuable to the Twins for reasons John stated. However, we probably aren't going to compete next year. If we can get a B-level pitching prospect, than you take it. Building for the future is the goal.

  15. #15
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,848
    Like
    180
    Liked 667 Times in 377 Posts
    The Twins should be shopping him hard and if they can add a Myers type prospect or better - do it. If you are worried about who plays LF - go out and sign a Scott Hairston, Ryan Ludwick, or Cody Ross to try and capture some magic again. I'd much rather have another bullet in our AA chamber than an aging outfielder. Hopefully Ryan feels the same.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    797
    Like
    15
    Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    Twins should be stockpiling pitching. Any trade that brings in B and above pitchers at reasonable prices needs to be considered.

  17. #17
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,529
    Like
    78
    Liked 173 Times in 107 Posts
    Blog Entries
    31
    Trade him and add some cash to get the highest upside prospect offered.

    There is a very high likelihood of a significant decline or significant injury before the commitment ends.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    399
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by beckmt View Post
    Twins should be stockpiling pitching. Any trade that brings in B and above pitchers at reasonable prices needs to be considered.
    Exactly. We definitely need to restock our farm system with pitching, Which is why I love todays trade.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    871
    Like
    474
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    mww,

    you just said the Twins have no pitchers coming up in the minors 2-4 years from now. This is simply an entirely bogus statement. Why do you keep saying this?

    Advice: temper it to say the system is thin in the upper minors. This would be arguably an accurate statement.

  20. #20
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,713
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 564 Times in 369 Posts
    My assumption is Gibson is up this year, who do you think will be effective in 2 or 3 years? 4 was a mistake, I typed that on my phone and meant to hit three....but who else besides Gibson do you think is coming up in less than 3 years (this was obviously typed before today's trade)? Who do you feel is in high A or AA or AAA that looks like anything better than a 5th starter? Wimmers? He just had surgery. Hermsen? He cannot strike out AA hitters. No one in AAA, I assume. So, who is in the minors coming up in less than 3 years (before today's trade)?
    Lighten up Francis....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.