Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Royals Destroy My Dreams, Acquire Ervin Santana

  1. #1
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    6,436
    Twitter
    @sethtweets
    Like
    64
    Liked 347 Times in 183 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515

    Royals Destroy My Dreams, Acquire Ervin Santana

    According to Ken Rosenthal, the Royals have acquired RHP Ervin Santana from the LA Angels. Rumors were that the Angels were looking to deal Santana and Dan Haren, and that if they couldn't, they would likely decline their options for 2013. Well, the Royals apparently are willing to bet $13 Million that he'll turn things around in 2013. Who the Royals traded to the Angels at this point is unknown.

    I thought that Santana was a great choice for a bounce-back season in 2013. If you look at his numbers, he has been very good and pretty durable most of the past five years.

    So, can Santana be a bounce-back pitcher for the Royals OR will he be this year's Jonathan Sanchez?

    UPDATE - The Angels acquire 27-year-old LHP Brandon Sisk, who posted a 1.35 WHIP in AAA in 2012. In other words, the Royals gave up just slightly over nothing to acquire a potential solid #2. Nice work for the Royals!
    Last edited by Seth Stohs; 10-31-2012 at 04:19 PM. Reason: updated

  2. #2
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,535
    Like
    61
    Liked 340 Times in 216 Posts
    So if the Angels only required Nothing to give up Santana, does that mean they'll give up Next to Nothing for Haren should the buying team be willing to eat most of the salary?

  3. #3
    Owner MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    8,022
    Twitter
    @rocketpig76
    Like
    47
    Liked 1,516 Times in 793 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Smart move by the Royals.

  4. #4
    Senior Member All-Star Winston Smith's Avatar
    Posts
    1,260
    Like
    77
    Liked 311 Times in 151 Posts
    I think Haren has a 3.5 buy out. I'd be happy to give up a 20's prospect for Haren and 3.5 mill.
    This comment brought to you from the Rosedale Mall studio by Hamm's Beer, brewed in the land of sky blue waters.

  5. #5
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    and we wait for the dust to settle to see what our baseball guru will produce for us ,im guessing our rotation for 2013
    moyer
    wakefield
    kevin correia
    diamond
    baker/gibson

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,270
    Like
    32
    Liked 120 Times in 78 Posts
    I'm not sure that I'm buying this Santana has been very good for the last 5 years business. His ERA has been bouncing between 3.50 and 5 and his XFIP has been bouncing between 4 and 4.50. He had the one great season in '08 (K:BB rates) and it looked like he was poised to become an ace. Then he hurt his elbow and has never come close to repeating those K and BB rates (velocity declined). He was a solid pickup but he really isn't that exciting.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    198
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Eh, not a bad move by the Royals but certainly nothing worth writing home about. WAR the past 4 years: 1.0, 2.2, 2.9, -0.9. He's getting paid 12 million by the Royals. Lets say he bounces back in the 2.5 WAR range, he's still getting paid at pretty much a market rate.

  8. #8

    Good pick up by Royals

    I thnk this a great trade for the Royals getting Santana for next to nothing. Sure they will pay most of the $13 million salary but they send a nice message to their fans telling them that they are willing to try to improve even after gettig burnt on the Jonathan Sanchez deal last winter. KC seems to be collecting pitchers.
    jjswol

  9. #9
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,472
    Like
    66
    Liked 145 Times in 94 Posts
    Blog Entries
    30
    I wouldn't call 13 million nothing. I'd rather pay Baker 9.25 million than pay Santana 13 million while giving up a C prospect.

    Santana has to be ecstatic. There is no way he gets that contract as a free agent.

  10. #10
    Senior Member All-Star YourHouseIsMyHouse's Avatar
    Posts
    1,235
    Like
    8
    Liked 17 Times in 12 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    His pay rate is way too high and I like the salary dump for the Angels in this. I don't think this a good move for the Royals since Santana is a career 4.33 ERA pitcher. Nothing special and he's really more like a #3 option at best in terms of performance.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    134
    Like
    1
    Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
    Agree. A little too much cash for his performance, but it might be a case of overpaying because of ack of alternatives

  12. #12
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    198
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    I presume the Royals idea is if they aren't competitive at the deadline to flip him for a better prospect then.

  13. #13
    Twins Moderator MVP USAFChief's Avatar
    Posts
    6,495
    Like
    3,515
    Liked 3,014 Times in 1,280 Posts
    Getting Santana for nothing but salary is the type of move the Twins would make if ownership was serious about winning. Teams needing to put together 4/5ths of a rotation don't have the luxery of waiting for perfect solutions.

    Nice move for KC, whether it works or not.

    Anybody who thinks Santana doesn't represent a likely upgrade to what the Twins ran out in 2012, or wouldn't represent a probable upgrade to what they will likely run out in 2013, hasn't been paying much attention.

  14. #14
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,270
    Like
    32
    Liked 120 Times in 78 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by USAFChief View Post
    Anybody who thinks Santana doesn't represent a likely upgrade to what the Twins ran out in 2012, or wouldn't represent a probable upgrade to what they will likely run out in 2013, hasn't been paying much attention.
    Nobody said that.

  15. #15
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,641
    Like
    9
    Liked 53 Times in 34 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by kab21 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by USAFChief View Post
    Anybody who thinks Santana doesn't represent a likely upgrade to what the Twins ran out in 2012, or wouldn't represent a probable upgrade to what they will likely run out in 2013, hasn't been paying much attention.
    Nobody said that.
    But did they think it? Not everybody posts every thought they have. The person who thinks the Twins are going to sign Jamie Moyer ought to not post every crazy thought.
    Last edited by old nurse; 10-31-2012 at 10:48 PM.

  16. #16
    Twins News Team All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,928
    Like
    243
    Liked 182 Times in 105 Posts
    The Royals acquired a scuffling, but talented Sanchez last year, and that didn't work out well at all. I question the Royal's ability to spot major league arms.

  17. #17
    Twins News Team All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,928
    Like
    243
    Liked 182 Times in 105 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by USAFChief View Post
    Getting Santana for nothing but salary is the type of move the Twins would make if ownership was serious about winning. Teams needing to put together 4/5ths of a rotation don't have the luxery of waiting for perfect solutions.
    Sure, but the pitcher whom they acquire actually does matter. In FA they can acquire a pitcher for nothing but salary. Santana has all kinds of questions marks, and might be the wrong pitcher, even if the right type of move.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    198
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PseudoSABR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by USAFChief View Post
    Getting Santana for nothing but salary is the type of move the Twins would make if ownership was serious about winning. Teams needing to put together 4/5ths of a rotation don't have the luxery of waiting for perfect solutions.
    Sure, but the pitcher whom they acquire actually does matter. In FA they can acquire a pitcher for nothing but salary. Santana has all kinds of questions marks, and might be the wrong pitcher, even if the right type of move.
    Santana was acquired for pretty much just salary as well, they really only gave up a version of Slama. The question of course is, was it good value. Acquiring a middling pitcher on a not particularly friendly contract isn't exactly an excellent move. There's a reason Santana only brought what he did, all the other teams said "Overpaid".

  19. #19
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,253
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Blog Entries
    1
    Sometimes you have to overpay if you want to win. Kc just got alot better.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    198
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Gun View Post
    Sometimes you have to overpay if you want to win. Kc just got alot better.
    Good lord guys, its Ervin Santana not Johan in his prime. You know the guy with a career 4.33 era. 3.0 B/9 and 7.1 K/9. Edwin Jackson will probably be signed for a similar, albeit multiyear, deal. He's also a younger, better pitcher.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.