07-26-2012, 09:18 PM #21
From the "tweet" (JHC I hate everything about that stupid device), it appears that Jon Freekin Heyman made the, uh, suggestion to the "Twins person." How else would he know?
WTF is Jon Heyman doing suggesting ANYthing to ANYbody on the Minnesota Twins staff? Isn't Jon Heyman a reporter? Reporters try to MAKE news now?
"Hey, Twins person, anything happening on Willingham?" Fine.
"Hey, Twins person, you should trade Willingham!!" GTFOOH.
Stick to getting your insider info from Boras, you clown.
07-26-2012, 09:20 PM #22
07-26-2012, 09:30 PM #23
- Liked 56 Times in 45 Posts
- Blog Entries
What's Willingham's WAR? I bet when you calculate the average cost of WAR times his WAR = more than twice his contract value. So to get = value we need to do better than double his value just to break even in a trade.
07-26-2012, 09:32 PM #24
The reason to trade Willingham is because he could land a significant bounty for this team. It would be the first smart, "sell high" move the team has made since.....what? AJ?
07-26-2012, 10:11 PM #25
I kinda hate this sort of thread. Granted, if someone's willing to give you a dozen gold-plated A+ prospects for Willingham, you trade him; and if someone's willing to give you Jim Thome's knees and a bag of practice balls, you don't.
How about instead of asking "should we trade him!?" (which is a stupid question), ask "should we trade him for x, y, and/or z?"
07-26-2012, 10:17 PM #26
07-26-2012, 10:20 PM #27
07-26-2012, 10:28 PM #28
07-26-2012, 11:00 PM #29How about instead of asking "should we trade him!?" (which is a stupid question), ask "should we trade him for x, y, and/or z?"
07-26-2012, 11:01 PM #30
07-27-2012, 12:00 AM #31
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
- Blog Entries