Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Jim Bowden: Twins should trade Liriano, Burton, Morneau & Willingham to Giants

  1. #1
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,298
    Like
    1
    Liked 115 Times in 65 Posts
    Blog Entries
    231

    Jim Bowden: Twins should trade Liriano, Burton, Morneau & Willingham to Giants

    http://espn.go.com/blog/the-gms-office

    This is insider only, unfortunately, so tread lightly on pulling passages. But you can see the proposed deal for free at the top of the story:

    Minnesota Twins send Francisco Liriano, Jared Burton, Justin Morneau, Josh Willingham and cash to the San Francisco Giants for Brandon Belt, Kyle Crick, Mike Kickham and Heath Hembree
    Crick was mentioned by Nick in today's Trade Target Team Series.

  2. #2
    Banned Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    636
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Sure Jim Bowden, that totally make sense.

    Why SF needs another outfielder after getting great run outta Pagan, Melky and Blanco I don't know. But who cares...you're Jim Bowden. You work for the four letter network, you don't have to make sense.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Double-A PMKI's Avatar
    Posts
    128
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Seems like a lot to give up for us.

  4. #4
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    4,609
    Like
    512
    Liked 214 Times in 147 Posts
    Not exactly their top prospects, according to pre-season rankings at fangraphs...at work, can't check how they are playing this year...Not sure how I feel about Belt, frankly.
    Lighten up Francis....

  5. #5
    I just saw this also. I don't know enough about these prospects, but Burton and Willingham have to have a lot of value, and isn't Belt somewhat redundant with Parmalee in AAA? (I realize that Belt is probably a better player)

  6. #6
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,924
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    That is a horrible trade proposal for the Twins. Just wow!

  7. #7
    Banned Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    636
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SDTwinsFan View Post
    I just saw this also. I don't know enough about these prospects, but Burton and Willingham have to have a lot of value, and isn't Belt somewhat redundant with Parmalee in AAA? (I realize that Belt is probably a better player)
    Not that it matters, but I'd take Belt over Parmelee.

  8. #8
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,379
    Like
    249
    Liked 191 Times in 109 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    The Pohlads would lose a ton of cash in this deal immediately and next year and the next year, and more yet if those prospects don't pan out.

  9. #9
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,168
    Like
    19
    Liked 197 Times in 125 Posts
    Pass. I guess I'll play the homer, but that should be the return for Willingham and his awesome contract alone. Only one of the Giants top ten prospects and the under-achieving Brandon Belt? Pass. The best prospect included in that deal is a reliever, no thanks. The Giants just do not have the starting pitching quality to match up with the Twins. Giving up four established players and only getting back 2 minor league starters, only one of which is in the organizations top 20, seems laughable.

    Edit: Time to give Terry Ryan a criticism break for the day. If Ryan steps down as GM again, obviously the Twins could do much worse.
    Last edited by nicksaviking; 07-26-2012 at 02:13 PM.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by DPJ View Post
    Not that it matters, but I'd take Belt over Parmelee.
    I'm thinking most people would, but we need pitching so I don't understand why Belt is a good get with Parmalee as a "low cost 1B option" too. I hope that nothing like this actually happens.

  11. #11
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,298
    Like
    1
    Liked 115 Times in 65 Posts
    Blog Entries
    231
    Would getting Gary Brown change things? Or are there any young arms that would help?

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    4,609
    Like
    512
    Liked 214 Times in 147 Posts
    Yup, in looking, not a fan of this deal, unless they Twins pay zero dollars, even then I don't like it....
    Lighten up Francis....

  13. #13
    Senior Member Triple-A Dilligaf69's Avatar
    Posts
    363
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Yeah right! ...would need onf their starters NOT named Lincecum, and even then I'm not sure.

  14. #14
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,298
    Like
    1
    Liked 115 Times in 65 Posts
    Blog Entries
    231
    Let me switch this up a bit. What if the Twins traded Liriano, Burton and Morneau, but not Willingham. And what if the Giants had to pay all of Morneau's salary.

    Then what would it take? (I gotta be honest - the Giants farm system seems really weak. It's hard to find a good package here.)

  15. #15
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    378
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Bowden continues to show he is an idiot. Hard to believe he got hired in the first place, by the Reds or ESPN.

  16. #16
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    3,628
    Like
    840
    Liked 611 Times in 235 Posts
    ESPN doesn't exactly have the highest standards, I can understand it completely.
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ballÖ and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  17. #17
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,694
    Like
    32
    Liked 772 Times in 423 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    If the Twins make this deal, do they get the entire roster for the Giants' AA and A+ ball affiliates?

    Because given the state of the Giants farm, that's what it should take.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    378
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    I know, let's take it this way. Since everybody wants "change", we could hire Bowden as our GM and Dan Gladden as our manager. Bowden brings his willingness to trade current talent for minor league "prospects" and Gladden brings his folksy, beer drinking, grittiness. It's a win for everybody!

    (Excuse me while I go waterboard myself)

  19. #19
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,388
    Like
    50
    Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DPJ View Post
    Sure Jim Bowden, that totally make sense.

    Why SF needs another outfielder after getting great run outta Pagan, Melky and Blanco I don't know. But who cares...you're Jim Bowden. You work for the four letter network, you don't have to make sense.
    great run? Melky is having a great year but the Giants are 23rd in the league in slugging and 21st in runs scored. Blanco .248/.341/.369 isn't helping out in RF. You don't think they would like a Willingham: .271,.384/.563? Melky Cabrera is a FA after this year and is going to cash in so long term Willingham has a spot too. This deal might not make sense but it isn't because of SF outfield.

    That said I think the Twins would be fools to take this trade.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Double-A COtwin's Avatar
    Posts
    113
    Like
    1
    Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Jim Jim Jim. You must not have a very high opinion of your readers intelligence. The twins give up two high quality players, one of which should have been an all-star. And two "wild cards" with massive upside, one capable of MVP caliber play and the other capable of becoming a legit ace. You are selling this as a trade that benefits both buyer and seller? Laughable.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.