Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 72

Thread: Article: Out of Answers

  1. #41
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,609
    Like
    68
    Liked 380 Times in 233 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deanlambrecht View Post
    I actually feel foolish even stating this, but watching his outing and thinking about his dramatic drop in performance made me wonder if he was juicing when he was with the Phillies, but is no longer doing that, and this is what he's really like without the juice. I just can't think of any logical explanations.

    Only in jest, because I'm very anti-PED's and would not want to lay baseless accusations against anyone, but:

    Are we entirely sure that he was thoroughly and vetted that Vance Worley is not actually Eric Gagne.


    Last edited by nicksaviking; 03-19-2014 at 12:41 PM.

  2. This user likes nicksaviking's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    ashburyjohn (03-19-2014)

  3. #42
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer gil4's Avatar
    Posts
    584
    Like
    147
    Liked 147 Times in 83 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantes929 View Post
    Maybe they should ask him to tank one more start so he will be more likely to pass through waivers.
    Right now I don't think they would have to ask. They could just run him out there again.

  4. These 2 users like gil4's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    snepp (03-19-2014), USAFChief (03-19-2014)

  5. #43
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    286
    Like
    0
    Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by gil4 View Post
    Right now I don't think they would have to ask. They could just run him out there again.
    That's funny and you are probably right. Thing is if he has two good outings I don't think that should be enough for him to go north but it might be enough to keep him from passing through waivers. By the way, this is in response to a prior poster but I was completely kidding about asking him to tank his next game. Best result for the Twins is if he passes waivers and goes to the minors. That's the gut check. If he earns his way back then I tip my cap to him and hope he does well but that is the way it should be done. If he fails then we would rather him do it at the minor league level and that is just the nature of the game.

  6. #44
    Right now, you have to wait until the last day to send him thru. If you did it today, another team could claim him and keep him until the last day, and he would probably go thru waivers. 25-man rosters are far from set, so he is the 26th-man on any claim, at the moment. i imagine he would go thru. You can also hold off and keep him on the roster and send him down opening week, too. But, if he is injured now or in the time he's in major league camp, he collects major league salary on the dl. Personally, the Twins have to STOP thinking about options and waivers and anything else. Go with the BEST 25. Trust your depth. If a guy doesn't look like he'll be here next year for sure, don't worry so much about losing him this year. The Parmelees, Diamonds, Worleys, Mastros (even Duensings) are all replaceable parts, if not internally, maybe by picking up someone else's waiver wire guy. The killer is some of these guys stinkin' up the minors and keeping the future from playing now, today. Do we need Diamond and Worley taking starts at AAA. Seriously?

  7. #45
    Senior Member All-Star LaBombo's Avatar
    Posts
    2,821
    Like
    1,649
    Liked 1,681 Times in 840 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    When was the last time a 26 year old starter was waived after putting together 250+ sub-4.00 innings followed by just one bad season? Doesn't mean the Twins can't or shouldn't waive him, but it seems like an awfully unusual career path.

  8. #46
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    104
    Like
    9
    Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Twins Cap View Post
    Worst starting pitcher on the worst starting staff in baseball. Are we really concerned that another team will pick him up? I agree with Shane, this is just plain WEIRD that he is so bad, but weirder things have happened. Time to move on.


    I agree. I realize he's still reasonably young & there is always a chance he will bounce back but do we need to worry that someone will claim a pitcher who had a 7.21 ERA last year and has looked far worse this spring?

    His upside seems likely to be a #4 or 5 starter & we already have plenty of them. He's been passed by plenty of others.

    Trevor May was always "the guy" in the Revere trade. Worley was just a decent throw in. I remember hearing that the Phillies thought the league had figured Worley out & he wasn't likely to be successful in the future

  9. #47
    Senior Member All-Star LaBombo's Avatar
    Posts
    2,821
    Like
    1,649
    Liked 1,681 Times in 840 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosterman View Post
    The killer is some of these guys stinkin' up the minors and keeping the future from playing now, today. Do we need Diamond and Worley taking starts at AAA. Seriously?
    Most of the good starting prospects are still over a year away from AAA. And it seems to me that if the Twins can absorb over 300 innings of major and minor league pitching from Nick Blackburn after his 2010 season that made it apparent to everyone but the Twins FO that he's a bad pitcher, they ought to be able to scrape up some innings somewhere for Worley and Diamond to get sorted out.

  10. #48
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,783
    Like
    666
    Liked 384 Times in 214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    Yeah your comp is Nick Blackburn. The ages don't lineup perfectly but its the same story. Guy with lackluster stuff suddenly becomes less than 100% perfect with his command, because of injury, psychology, mechanics, age, whatever, and then he gets shelled. There's just no room for error. Even when they hit all their spots, upside is 1-2 years of 4.00 ERA pitching, eg. Worley cca. 2011-2012, Blackburn cca. 2008-2009 or Diamond cca. 2012. This is not a new story, esp. to the Twins.

  11. #49
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,783
    Like
    666
    Liked 384 Times in 214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    I will say that while the Twins have 2 weeks of free control, what I would do is sit Worley down and tell him his only shot of making the club is if he can beat out Fien for the 7th inning spot. Tell him he has 1 inning. See if he can dial it up to 95-96.

  12. This user likes Willihammer's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    darin617 (03-19-2014)

  13. #50
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,863
    Like
    182
    Liked 668 Times in 377 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PseudoSABR View Post
    That's cherry picking stats to prove your conclusion. Revere was fringe in 2011 and 2013. After all, I can write a sentence like: I can't believe people are willing to give up a cost controlled SP that put a 3.4 WAR in his second year. The sentence however is misleading; the point is that there's a real debate, and it's pretty easy to see the warts and upside of both Worley and Revere.
    I don't understand why we have to belittle the value Revere would have had to us the last two years in order to establish that Worley has value as well.

    We gave up a valuable outfielder that surely would've helped this team. (If the injury hadn't happened of course) What we got was a pretty solid looking pitcher....we just have to hope we can find that guy again and find a way to keep him.

  14. This user likes TheLeviathan's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    big dog (03-20-2014)

  15. #51
    Senior Member All-Star LaBombo's Avatar
    Posts
    2,821
    Like
    1,649
    Liked 1,681 Times in 840 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Willihammer View Post
    Even when they hit all their spots, upside is 1-2 years of 4.00 ERA pitching, eg. Worley cca. 2011-2012, Blackburn cca. 2008-2009 or Diamond cca. 2012. This is not a new story, esp. to the Twins.
    Agree with the last part, but Blackburn isn't really a comp for Worley, he's the floor of the range of sustained mediocrity the organization will tolerate. Unlike Worley, Blackburn was unable to miss bats except for the occasional intentional walk. So Worley might end up being the ceiling of the range of mediocre guys they don't tolerate.

    Won't be crying in my Corona if Worleybird is waived and claimed, but after what other guys have repeatedly gotten by with, it would be a bit of a head-scratcher.

  16. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by cmathewson View Post
    I was at the game last night. I cannot imagine a scout looking at that and saying he's worth an MLB roster spot. I saw more outs during batting practice. And there were no bloopers or dribblers. Everything was hit on the screws, with several good defensive plays behind him. It's not like this is the first bad outing, either. We saw similar performance in his time with the Twins last year and earlier in the spring. You'd have to be pretty desperate to take a flier on him.
    From my observations, the problem with Worley is pretty clear: His stuff doesn't play unless he keeps the ball at the knees. He was doing that in Philly, but since he came over here, he has not.

    No idea what the solution is, though. There are some hints that he's just overthrowing, and that may be affecting either a sinking quality to his pitches or the release point or....? I suspect this "Vanimal" stuff isn't helping, nor is anxiety. He maybe has a chance if he figures out again how to pitch rather than throw.

    The problem the Twins have is that he does have upside. He has proven major league ability. But can it be tapped again? We could stash him in the bullpen for a while, using him only in low stress situations like mopping up forgone losses, and maybe he could find himself before we get to the point in May where bullpen depth becomes critical. The DL possibility someone proposed could work.

    If they DFA him, somebody will pick him up and then DFA him. So if we're going to DFA him, it has to be at a time where a team wanting to pick him up is forced to option (or DFA) another player. That happens on last cutdown day. And even then, a team may be willing to do that. And when that team evntually DFAs him, maybe another team picks him up. But eventually the merry-go-round stops, and the last team gets to send him to the minors to try to figure out a way to consistently keep the ball down. I'd really like for us to be that team. Because if he and his coaches do figure it out, he's a good pitcher.

  17. This user likes jimv2's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    diehardtwinsfan (03-19-2014)

  18. #53
    Just release him. I don't want him taking minor league innings from our young pitchers who need them.

  19. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by gil4 View Post
    Right now I don't think they would have to ask. They could just run him out there again.
    So True!

  20. #55
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,494
    Like
    156
    Liked 144 Times in 75 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LaBombo View Post
    When was the last time a 26 year old starter was waived after putting together 250+ sub-4.00 innings followed by just one bad season? Doesn't mean the Twins can't or shouldn't waive him, but it seems like an awfully unusual career path.
    The results with the Phillies was the aberration, what we are seeing now is the norm.
    It wasnt too hard to predict if you look at the numbers outside of the shiny ERA. You cant sustain a K/looking rate like Worley had. Unless you have nasty stuff (which he doesnt), making hitters take strike 3 is not a skill, its just a freak instance of randomness.
    Add to that, the fact that he isnt committed to baseball, as evidenced by his comments regarding his conditioning last year, and his constant excuses after bad performances, and you have a bad combination.
    I got ripped pretty hard last year when I predicted this outcome, but it is no big loss if Worley is claimed by another team, I don't see a reason to wait.

  21. #56
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,245
    Like
    107
    Liked 105 Times in 77 Posts
    Would one good game actually change anything? Pitchers are stacking-up in the system (remember those signed this off-season?)--cut Worley loose and give a game to somebody worthy.

  22. #57
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,494
    Like
    156
    Liked 144 Times in 75 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kwak View Post
    Would one good game actually change anything? Pitchers are stacking-up in the system (remember those signed this off-season?)--cut Worley loose and give a game to somebody worthy.
    Exactly.
    If Worley can't crack the rotation this year, when will he?
    Hopefully by this time next year Gibson and Meyer will be in the rotation, and by then you'll have a couple more young guys knocking on the door, with Nolasco and Hughes signed multiple years, this was the year for him to sink or swim, I don't see a future here for the 'Vanimal'.

  23. #58
    If he gets claimed off waivers does he need to stay on that team's 25 man roster?

  24. #59
    Senior Member All-Star LaBombo's Avatar
    Posts
    2,821
    Like
    1,649
    Liked 1,681 Times in 840 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Brooks View Post
    The results with the Phillies was the aberration, what we are seeing now is the norm.
    It wasnt too hard to predict if you look at the numbers outside of the shiny ERA. You cant sustain a K/looking rate like Worley had. Unless you have nasty stuff (which he doesnt), making hitters take strike 3 is not a skill, its just a freak instance of randomness.
    Fewer than 50 innings is the norm, and the preceding 5 years, 2 in the majors, were the aberration? Maybe it's the new norm if his arm is still screwed up, but otherwise... really?

    If you look past the shiny ERA, you see shiny (for the Twins) FIPs and xFIPs, BABIP fortune that evens out to average or so, and K/BB and HR rates that should allow a pitcher to sustain a 4ish ERA most of the time.

    Worley's chance of continued success in a major league rotation took another hit last year, after the 2012 arm problem dealt the first one. And there's no clear place to put him. But for a franchise that blocked half of its top four rotation spots for KC and Pelf again, discarding Worley looks like it might be another sign that a franchise that has been one of the worst in MLB at figuring out starting pitching has failed yet again.

  25. #60
    Senior Member All-Star cmathewson's Avatar
    Posts
    2,272
    Like
    241
    Liked 464 Times in 291 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by USAFChief View Post
    It's the zero swinging strikes that is most telling, IMO. Sometimes, the BABIP gods can be cruel and everything put in play seems to find a hole. But if you can't get even one swing and miss in 61 pitches, it seems to me you're not throwing major league stuff. Send him down, and if someone claims him so be it.
    Yeah. Also, everything was hit hard. My buddy called it the parade of doubles. There was no luck here. It was pure, unadulterated crappy pitching. In a regular season game, he wouldn't have lasted through the second inning.
    "If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.