Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: International signings 2014

  1. #1
    Senior Member Triple-A maxisagod's Avatar
    Posts
    310
    Like
    36
    Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts

    International signings 2014

    I'm sure Doogie Wolfson will keep digging up the Twins' Interest in Cuban players like he did today. And Jeremy will write up a primer in April or May again, but Kiley McDaniel has been reporting that the International trading rules are about to be taken advantage of again, this time on a whole new spending level. For a few months now he has been writing about how the Yankees plan to blow by their international "cap" limits this year. Just like the Cubs and Rangers did last year, and the Rays the year before that. He also goes into the Game Theory: The Tragedy of the Commons to explain why this is happening now.

    This coupled with the rumors the Brewers have an agreement with Twins target Gilbert Lara,
    might make this a horrible season to have the 5th biggest spending pool.
    I get the Twins 'could' do this if they wanted too as well, and they may still have money to spend from the 2013 period, but I don't see that happening. They have a price in their head about what a player's value is actually worth and don't make an offer over that, The Cuban Free agent market over the past three years is proof that they'll get out bid on most of these players.

    The bottom line is the Twins will keep playing within the rules, they will not be able to sign any high end 16 year old free agent stars for the next couple years, which will weaken the system down the road. For the first time, I'm firmly in the camp of a International draft.

  2. This user likes maxisagod's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    Don't Feed the Greed Guy (02-14-2014)

  3. #2
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    2 (15 )year olds already have a handshake deal in place worth ove 3 million each.
    The Yankees are reportedly going to spend 12-18 million (not counting penalty money)
    To me it is time for a hard cap on every thing on all drafts and payroll caps 189 million
    I would prefer there was a national and an International draft that included all players including 23 year olds and no posting fee to Japan ...if you want to play in the MLB , then sign up for the draft and get treated like the rest of America

  4. #3
    Senior Member Triple-A maxisagod's Avatar
    Posts
    310
    Like
    36
    Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnydakota View Post
    2 (15 )year olds already have a handshake deal in place worth ove 3 million each.
    The Yankees are reportedly going to spend 12-18 million (not counting penalty money)
    To me it is time for a hard cap on every thing on all drafts and payroll caps 189 million
    I would prefer there was a national and an International draft that included all players including 23 year olds and no posting fee to Japan ...if you want to play in the MLB , then sign up for the draft and get treated like the rest of America
    I try to stay positive, and it's hard to fault the Twins for doing what 25 other teams are doing by not turning this into a higher and earlier bidding war; But when would it stop on its own? Are teams going to begin coming to agreements with children out of the Little League World series? This is unsustainable. Could you imagine if the Yankees and the Red Sox came to agreements with 8 of the top 15 prospects 6 months before the Rule 4 draft? I look forward to amateur signings, but I suspect the Twins won't be signing any big names out of the Dominican Republic or Venezuela this year.
    Last edited by maxisagod; 02-13-2014 at 08:32 PM.

  5. This user likes maxisagod's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-13-2014)

  6. #4
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,718
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 564 Times in 369 Posts
    Some teams do everything they can to add premium talent. Within the rules. I wish the twins would even spend the amount allowed, let alone do this.
    Lighten up Francis....

  7. #5
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    438
    Like
    0
    Liked 42 Times in 31 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    Some teams do everything they can to add premium talent. Within the rules. I wish the twins would even spend the amount allowed, let alone do this.
    Are you the Twins won't spend the amount allowed? I don't believe the signing period is over yet. More importantly, I think the talent pool in the Dominican Republic gets over estimated, quite a bit. There has been some incredible talent from DR, but it doesn't appear every year. For every Cabrera there are a lot of guys who get very good money but never amount to much. Remember that one of the best pitchers for DR last year in the International Series was Sam Deduno, can you a imagine how far down on the list he would of been if he were an American citizen?

    The kids from the Domincan are so young when they are signed, that it mostly a guess which will develop into something and which won't. There are obvious exceptions such as Sano, but spending a lot less money might get you a Polanco, if you guess right. Largely, I have no problem with the Twins playing by the rules. You have to be pretty sure the 16 year old kid you are investing big bucks in, has a darn good chance to be extra special to justify going way over the cap.

  8. #6
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    874
    Like
    474
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    Some teams do everything they can to add premium talent. Within the rules. I wish the twins would even spend the amount allowed, let alone do this.
    First, you're wrongfully insinuating that the Twins aren't spending to their cap. Check your facts, mike. They're almost at the cap and there's time left. It's unfair on your part to make this claim.

    Secondly, mike, it's a question of ethics. It is not alright to behave contrary to the very obvious spirit of the rules, even if the rules aren't technically broken. We should be happy when organizations play by the rules and honor the spirit upon which they were established.

  9. #7
    Damn Yankees. I am a big fan of the international free agent pool and believe that it's the best way to add talent. It's a shame that these teams "beat the system." Though I'm sure it will be considered innovative. Was the idea of a draft tabled? Or is it still in talks?

  10. #8
    Twins News Team MVP
    Posts
    6,759
    Like
    882
    Liked 857 Times in 552 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by birdwatcher View Post
    First, you're wrongfully insinuating that the Twins aren't spending to their cap. Check your facts, mike. They're almost at the cap and there's time left. It's unfair on your part to make this claim.

    Secondly, mike, it's a question of ethics. It is not alright to behave contrary to the very obvious spirit of the rules, even if the rules aren't technically broken. We should be happy when organizations play by the rules and honor the spirit upon which they were established.
    What? If the "spirit of the rules' were truly being violated, don't you think the other members of the club would scream bloody murder? There are sanctions in place for teams that choose to go over their spending limits, dollar for dollar taxes, plus the sanction of an extreme limit of $250,000/max per signee in the year following the overage. The Twins haven't chosen some sort of "ethical high road", they simply have chosen not to pay a tax in a system they had a hand in establshing in the first place.

  11. This user likes jokin's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-13-2014)

  12. #9
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CK View Post
    Damn Yankees. I am a big fan of the international free agent pool and believe that it's the best way to add talent. It's a shame that these teams "beat the system." Though I'm sure it will be considered innovative. Was the idea of a draft tabled? Or is it still in talks?
    There is talk that will come into effect in 2016 at the earliest

  13. #10
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by birdwatcher View Post
    First, you're wrongfully insinuating that the Twins aren't spending to their cap. Check your facts, mike. They're almost at the cap and there's time left. It's unfair on your part to make this claim.

    Secondly, mike, it's a question of ethics. It is not alright to behave contrary to the very obvious spirit of the rules, even if the rules aren't technically broken. We should be happy when organizations play by the rules and honor the spirit upon which they were established.
    3,908,600, is what the Twins were allowed, what have they spent?really if you or any one knows I would like to be educated, as I have only heard of 3 guys signing and that puts them some where around 2,250,000-2,500,000

  14. #11
    Senior Member Triple-A maxisagod's Avatar
    Posts
    310
    Like
    36
    Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnydakota View Post
    3,908,600, is what the Twins were allowed, what have they spent?really if you or any one knows I would like to be educated, as I have only heard of 3 guys signing and that puts them some where around 2,250,000-2,500,000
    Ben Badler has it at 3,490,000
    http://www.baseballamerica.com/inter...nding-by-team/
    So about 400,000 still in the coffers. The Blue Jays and the Orioles have both spend that much on Dominican pitchers in the last 10 days, so the window isn't completely closed, nor is the well dry.

  15. This user likes maxisagod's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-14-2014)

  16. #12
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    4,178
    Twitter
    @thrylos98
    Like
    36
    Liked 446 Times in 273 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by birdwatcher View Post
    Secondly, mike, it's a question of ethics. It is not alright to behave contrary to the very obvious spirit of the rules, even if the rules aren't technically broken. We should be happy when organizations play by the rules and honor the spirit upon which they were established.
    "Ethics" and "spirit" of rules are open for interpretation. And speaking about "ethics" (i.e. what is "good" or "bad") in baseball is somewhat naive (Philosophically/Theologically/Whatever: Baseball is a game. Ethos is morality-centered; by definition a game is a non-moral situation.)

    As far as rules (in opposition to laws) go, the only way to interpret them is to push them and see what happens. And last time I checked, rules, as abstract contraptions occasionally written down, have no spirit (whatever that might be - and I don't mean Vodka.)
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  17. #13
    Senior Member Triple-A maxisagod's Avatar
    Posts
    310
    Like
    36
    Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    "Ethics" and "spirit" of rules are open for interpretation. And speaking about "ethics" (i.e. what is "good" or "bad") in baseball is somewhat naive (Philosophically/Theologically/Whatever: Baseball is a game. Ethos is morality-centered; by definition a game is a non-moral situation.)

    As far as rules (in opposition to laws) go, the only way to interpret them is to push them and see what happens. And last time I checked, rules, as abstract contraptions occasionally written down, have no spirit (whatever that might be - and I don't mean Vodka.)
    It's a pendulum swing. Spending on international amateurs started to increase higher than many owners wanted, so they tried (and failed) to get a draft put in place, but the soft cap they did get had disincentives that were weak, so spending starts swinging harder the other way, so then stricter rules or a draft will be demanded, and a system that really wasn't broken, suddenly needs to get fixed. I can understand why some teams would want to take advantage of that and why others wouldn't want to be complaisant in dissolving status quo.
    Last edited by maxisagod; 02-13-2014 at 10:03 PM.

  18. #14
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    874
    Like
    474
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jokin View Post
    What? If the "spirit of the rules' were truly being violated, don't you think the other members of the club would scream bloody murder? There are sanctions in place for teams that choose to go over their spending limits, dollar for dollar taxes, plus the sanction of an extreme limit of $250,000/max per signee in the year following the overage. The Twins haven't chosen some sort of "ethical high road", they simply have chosen not to pay a tax in a system they had a hand in establshing in the first place.
    Choosing the ethical high ground is EXACTLY what teams like the Twins are doing.

    They use words like "sanction" for a reason. While open to interpretation, I'm betting that almost every professor that teaches ethics would consider what the Cubs did as unethical. They knew what they agreed to, the behavior that the rules intended to incent. In the ethical worls, the Cubs cheated the system, period.

  19. #15
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    874
    Like
    474
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnydakota View Post
    3,908,600, is what the Twins were allowed, what have they spent?really if you or any one knows I would like to be educated, as I have only heard of 3 guys signing and that puts them some where around 2,250,000-2,500,000
    They have roughly $300,000 unspent. Consider yourself educated, johnny.

  20. This user likes birdwatcher's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-14-2014)

  21. #16
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    874
    Like
    474
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    "Ethics" and "spirit" of rules are open for interpretation. And speaking about "ethics" (i.e. what is "good" or "bad") in baseball is somewhat naive (Philosophically/Theologically/Whatever: Baseball is a game. Ethos is morality-centered; by definition a game is a non-moral situation

    As far as rules (in opposition to laws) go, the only way to interpret them is to push them and see what happens. And last time I checked, rules, as abstract contraptions occasionally written down, have no spirit (whatever that might be - and I don't mean Vodka.)
    With all due respect, this is nonsensical to the core. First of all, MLB is a business. A very big business. Secondly, I'd be a millionaire if I had ten bucks for every time you and others have called out the Twins management on questions of ethos. So, if it is a game, you'll have to explain this to me. Thirdly, rules and law go hand in hand. Google the Rules of Civil Procedure and then get back to me, because the last time I checked, there isn't a trial lawyer in existence that would chuckle at the thought of rules as some sort of contraption.

    Let's be real about the topic. Everyone knew what was expected of them. A handful of organizations are cheating the rest. Period.

  22. #17
    Twins News Team MVP
    Posts
    6,759
    Like
    882
    Liked 857 Times in 552 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    "Ethics" and "spirit" of rules are open for interpretation. And speaking about "ethics" (i.e. what is "good" or "bad") in baseball is somewhat naive (Philosophically/Theologically/Whatever: Baseball is a game. Ethos is morality-centered; by definition a game is a non-moral situation.)

    As far as rules (in opposition to laws) go, the only way to interpret them is to push them and see what happens. And last time I checked, rules, as abstract contraptions occasionally written down, have no spirit (whatever that might be - and I don't mean Vodka.)

    Better run that by Dave for further verification.

  23. #18
    Twins News Team MVP
    Posts
    6,759
    Like
    882
    Liked 857 Times in 552 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by birdwatcher View Post
    With all due respect, this is nonsensical to the core. First of all, MLB is a business. A very big business. Secondly, I'd be a millionaire if I had ten bucks for every time you and others have called out the Twins management on questions of ethos. So, if it is a game, you'll have to explain this to me. Thirdly, rules and law go hand in hand. Google the Rules of Civil Procedure and then get back to me, because the last time I checked, there isn't a trial lawyer in existence that would chuckle at the thought of rules as some sort of contraption.

    Let's be real about the topic. Everyone knew what was expected of them. A handful of organizations are cheating the rest. Period.
    If this were true, there would be a slew of lawsuits. With respect to these "agreements" between the clubs, I have yet to see one civil or crimnal lawsuit on a docket anywhere.

  24. #19
    Twins News Team MVP
    Posts
    6,759
    Like
    882
    Liked 857 Times in 552 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by birdwatcher View Post
    Choosing the ethical high ground is EXACTLY what teams like the Twins are doing.

    They use words like "sanction" for a reason. While open to interpretation, I'm betting that almost every professor that teaches ethics would consider what the Cubs did as unethical. They knew what they agreed to, the behavior that the rules intended to incent. In the ethical worls, the Cubs cheated the system, period.
    When the clubs came to the original agreement on this matter, the so-called sanctions you mention certainy would have had more teeth and consequences attached to them than simply a mere "matching tax," if this was really put in place with more serious intent. In that respect, you're right, the clubs knew what they agreed to....or should have known!

    Words like......."You shall not exceed your spending limit....PERIOD".... carry significantly more weight, both in an Business Ethics 101 course, as well as in the Real World.
    Last edited by jokin; 02-14-2014 at 12:09 AM.

  25. This user likes jokin's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-14-2014)

  26. #20
    Twins Contributor All-Star Jeremy Nygaard's Avatar
    Posts
    1,924
    Twitter
    @jeremynygaard
    Like
    1
    Liked 121 Times in 67 Posts
    Blog Entries
    178
    Just a note, the Twins had an agreement with Lewin Diaz well in advance of last July 2. Obviously not this early, but the Twins, like all other teams bend the rules. Teams, and players, also have been known to break verbal agreements. And teams have also made much earlier - and sometimes shadier - deals with trainers in the past. The issue isn't the Yankees, but the system. And I think we'll see a change coming in the future.

    One other thing to consider: the Yankees are significantly overpaying for guys this year. I *speculate* that in return for that, the trainers that benefited this year will scratch the Yankees back in the future, whether that means bargain deals or hiding prospects remains to be seen.

  27. These 4 users like Jeremy Nygaard's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (02-14-2014), jokin (02-14-2014), rukavina (02-14-2014), twinsfan34 (02-15-2014)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.