Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 103

Thread: Article: Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

  1. #1
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    463
    Like
    137
    Liked 55 Times in 41 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13

    Garza signs with the Brewers for 4 years, $52M


  2. #2
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer crarko's Avatar
    Posts
    762
    Like
    88
    Liked 301 Times in 161 Posts

    Garza-Brewers

    Per Ken Rosenthal. 4/52

  3. #3
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    146
    Like
    2
    Liked 16 Times in 9 Posts
    Not happy about this one bit.

  4. These 3 users like S.'s post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014), notoriousgod71 (01-23-2014), twinsfan34 (01-23-2014)

  5. #4
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,734
    Like
    36
    Liked 810 Times in 438 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Wow. That's a pretty sweet deal for the Brew Crew.

  6. #5
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    wow, did we miss out on this deal? would it have been posible to get a 3 year 48 million dollar deal? Well good luck Garza

  7. #6
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    883
    Like
    109
    Liked 133 Times in 60 Posts
    I'd rather have Garza than Nolasco and Hughes.

  8. These 2 users like notoriousgod71's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014), jokin (01-23-2014)

  9. #7
    Owner Big-Leaguer Parker Hageman's Avatar
    Posts
    998
    Like
    1
    Liked 38 Times in 25 Posts
    Blog Entries
    203

    Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

    Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

    This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).
    Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar:

    http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...yers=3340,3830

    What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

    Of course, one of the biggest concerns by teams making these sizeable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly truck and thigh).

    NolascovGarza.pngShould the Twins have waited for Garza at the same rate? What are your thoughts?
    @OverTheBaggy

  10. #8
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Boom Boom's Avatar
    Posts
    981
    Like
    4
    Liked 121 Times in 54 Posts
    Eh, he throws too many fastballs anyway.

  11. #9
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    we could have had him for 1 million a year more then Nolasco, if we got both it would have been a great off season , now , not so much

  12. This user likes johnnydakota's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    jokin (01-23-2014)

  13. #10
    Senior Member All-Star SpiritofVodkaDave's Avatar
    Posts
    3,616
    Like
    37
    Liked 184 Times in 104 Posts
    Wow! Would have been nice for the twins, but who knows, seems like he left money on the table regardless.

    Hopefully the twins can go get ubaldo. Or just wait for bailey next off season

  14. #11
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by notoriousgod71 View Post
    I'd rather have Garza than Nolasco and Hughes.
    we could have had all three, and I would be eatting crow for 6 months

  15. #12
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    4,643
    Like
    534
    Liked 217 Times in 149 Posts
    If that is all it took, I wish they'd have signed him and not Pelfrey.......
    Lighten up Francis....

  16. These 2 users like mike wants wins's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014), jokin (01-23-2014)

  17. #13
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,812
    Like
    27
    Liked 323 Times in 193 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Despite what the Twins (and Garza) have been saying publicly, I find it really hard to believe that a reunion could ever be possible, after what happened at his first stint with the Twins, which led to his departure. Not if the people involved then are the same who are running the team now.

    That said, the injury issues are legitimate
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  18. This user likes Thrylos's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    Trautmann13 (01-23-2014)

  19. #14
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,734
    Like
    36
    Liked 810 Times in 438 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Parker Hageman View Post
    Should the Twins have waited for Garza at the same rate? What are your thoughts?
    I know this isn't your stance, Parker, or at least it probably isn't your stance but I find this argument to be untenable upon examination.

    The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush and all that. The Twins have been burned in recent years by "waiting the market out" on pitchers and ended up scrounging junk off the pile because of it (well, that and dollars and years).

    There was no reason to expect Tanaka to hold the entire market hostage for two months. There was no reason to expect teams to shy away from Garza for as long as they did.

    Would I prefer Garza over Nolasco at the same price? Sure, I think that's pretty obvious... But if you're Terry Ryan in November, you can't bank on either Nolasco or Garza being available in late January or you're going to get burned on the free agent market almost every season if you wait it out and hope "your guy" is still available.

    You go get the guy you want at the price you're willing to pay. It's as simple as that. If there are "leftovers" at the end of the offseason, sure, you reevaluate at that time but don't delay your offseason plans in hopes that a guy will float in limbo for two months and that it will drive down the price... Because that's a pretty rare occurrence and can't be reliably predicted (or every team would employ this strategy every offseason).

  20. This user likes Brock Beauchamp's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    twinsfan34 (01-23-2014)

  21. #15
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Just goes to show you have been putting your hand in the wrong bush
    It would of and should of been the Twins signing Garza, wow It would have been the best off season since gravey was invented, the Twins adding a Legit #2/3 and #3/4 starter, and still having Stewart and Meyer in the pipeline....wow

  22. #16
    Senior Member All-Star JB_Iowa's Avatar
    Posts
    1,918
    Like
    438
    Liked 366 Times in 206 Posts
    It was pretty clear that the Garza camp was waiting until after Tanaka was resolved. Frankly, given the abysmal state of Twins pitching in 2013, I don't think the Twins could wait to see what happened with him. They needed to sign Nolasco and Hughes early.

    They probably could have waited before signing Pelfrey but even with Pelfrey signed, I think they still could have signed Garza -- I just don't think it was very likely as Thrylos stated.

    At this point I would rate the Twins' off-season at about a C+/B-. But they still have time (and money) to do a little more work.

  23. This user likes JB_Iowa's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    mike wants wins (01-23-2014)

  24. #17
    Member Single-A iTwins's Avatar
    Posts
    73
    Like
    7
    Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    With the Brewers getting Garza for a reasonable rate, I wonder if they were one of the few teams that offered a 4th year? There was quite a bit of speculation that many teams (the Twins included) were "in" so long as they didn't have to go too long in years. Perhaps the Brewers offered a 4th year other teams weren't comfortable with and thus got Garza for a good price. It'll be interesting to see how close other teams were as more details come out on his signing.

  25. This user likes iTwins's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014)

  26. #18
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,734
    Like
    36
    Liked 810 Times in 438 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    I can't get over this price. It really makes me wonder what Garza's medical reports look like because I can't fathom how a 30 year old pitcher of his quality only gets 4/$52m in this market.

  27. This user likes Brock Beauchamp's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014)

  28. #19
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    I can't get over this price. It really makes me wonder what Garza's medical reports look like because I can't fathom how a 30 year old pitcher of his quality only gets 4/$52m in this market.
    Well that should come out before they actually sign him,Kinda like Baltimore did.

    If he is healthy and signed for this , I will be really depressed, as it is another missed oppertunity

  29. #20
    Senior Member All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,101
    Like
    99
    Liked 346 Times in 197 Posts
    Yeah, on the face of it, this will be by far the best contract any team inks this offseason from a value standpoint.

    If the Twins had signed this, we'd all be rubbing our eyes to try and believe they managed it. This is a REALLY good deal for the Brewers. Even if he flops and has injury issues, right now there is no way to judge this as anything but a huge win.

    Fans of the Orioles and other near-contenders with needs and money to spend have to be just hating this.
    Last edited by TheLeviathan; 01-23-2014 at 01:34 PM.

  30. This user likes TheLeviathan's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-23-2014)

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.