You can view the page at http://www.twinsdaily.com/content.ph...arting-Pitcher
You can view the page at http://www.twinsdaily.com/content.ph...arting-Pitcher
Pitching wins games. Pitching wins pennant races. Pitching wins championships. A true baseball fan enjoys a 2-1 game. Pitching, pitching, pitching. If these guys don't succeed, it one heck of a long season. Fingers crossed for good health and a team SP ERA below 4.00
I cant understad how the twins have been without an ace for so long. Santana left 5 years ago now, and I feel we havent seen any real dominant starter since. How has starting pitching been left so obviously mediocre? Are aces that difficult to get? Are any potential phenoms on the way through the farm? thanks for your thoughts all.
Starting pitching is problem 1 for this team, and that's saying something.
Hard to see how it could happen, but if the starting pitching exceeds reasonable expectations, that'd go a long way towards a return to competitiveness for this season.
Not to mention I can't even begin to imagine what the rotation will look like on opening day 2013.
Were I GM, I'd be trying to get Liriano signed to an extension.
The Twins have 2 #3/#4 in Baker and Liriano. A #5 starter on any other team in Pavano. And 2 guys who have no business being anything other than a AAA starter or a long reliever on a minimum contract in Marquis and Blacky.
I was looking around the majors to try to find a worse rotation and I only found a couple candidates: Astros (easily better than twins if they hadn't moved Myers to the pen), Royals (much higher potential with Sanchez, Duffy, Montgomery but overall close).
This is going to be a PATHETIC year. Might as well bring Liam up and let him take his lumps as opposed to give any meaningful innings to bench fodder like Marquis and Blacky.
THIS HAS A CHANCE TO BE THE WORST ROTATION IN BASEBALL HISTORY!!!
Hopefully the offensive only improves on it's already decent spring training, because they're going to have to win a lot of 9-8 games...
It's also a good thing the bullpen will have Duensing and Swarzak, two pitchers who can pitch 3-4 innings every couple of days.
twinswon1991, this also has a chance to be a pretty good starting rotation. If we're really talking about 'chances,' then there's a chance Liriano will be good this year, finally getting control of his sideways cartwheel delivery. Baker I'm worried about, but he's had early season elbow trouble before and still had a good season. Blackburn appears to be in the best shape physically since his early days. Pavano looks no worse than last year. Marquis, yep, he's a complete question mark, but Liam Hendriks looks ready to fill in as needed, and I think Swarzak is a lot better than some do.
I'm not claiming anything spectacular for this staff, but the current starters are all veterans, and none of them appear likely to collapse mentally. The two backups appear to be mechanically sound and mentally tough. No Cy Young candidates, unless Liriano catches fire. The rest are #3's and 4's on most teams, but that's how the Twins have designed their team, mostly ground ball pitchers with good defense behind them. This bunch fits that mold pretty well.
Nice accessment and very truthful. Why is everybody just happy with baseball season starting? What the front office did was really unacceptable and it's not on Ryan. This mess is completely on the shoulders of the Pohlad family and their complete refusal to spend even a fraction of money. They did nothing to improve the starting rotation or bullpen. Basically our biggest pitching acquisition was Jason Marquis. Yes, it it true this was their biggest signing. Why other writers/bloggers protect the front office after they cut $15 million from payroll is mind boggling.
"allowing that much contact in front of a substandard defense led to a league-worst 1,086 hits allowed." They also walked 100 more batters than in 2010. It was just a horrible year all around. However, this is almost the exact same rotation as the team that won 94 games in 2010.
This staff is not very good, probably. I'd guess it won't be any better than 20th or so, which is criminal in a stadium this unfriendly to hitters.....as a real fan that has been watching baseball since the 60s, I like 6-5 games just as much as 2-1 games, but it sure would be nice if there were more games under 5 runs allowed this year.....
Yes, aces are that difficult to get. According to one of the Strib blogs there only exist 12 aces in all the majors.
Also, if you were able to find a couple of candidates in MLB that could be worse than the Twins rotation, even with your deeply pessimistic and seemingly anti-Twins attitude...how can this be the worst rotation in baseball history? I mean seriously.
Scott Baker: ERA+ of 128 last season.
Tim Lincecum: ERA+ of 130 last season.
Nick Blackburn: ERA+ of 89 last season, with injuries
Detroit's 2-4 starters last season (Scherzer, Porcello, Penny): 92, 86, 79 respectively
Still think he's not MLB-worthy?
The real issue with the Twins rotation is health, not ability. There's enough talent there for this club to compete, but if guys like Liriano, Baker, and Blackburn aren't healthy/can't stay healthy, then the team is going to have problems. But it's hard to bet on health one way or the other. Is Carl Pavano a workhorse or injury-riddled? FLA fans would call him a workhorse, after seeing back-to-back 200+ inning seasons. Yankee fans think of him as an injury-riddled mess with 3 straight seasons where he could get on/stay on the field. Since then he's been back to workhorse mode with 4 straight 200+ inning seasons! (ok, I rounded up a bit; the first 2 of those 4 he was actually at 199 1/3 in each of them) Which should we project/count on?
The Twins are betting their starters will be healthy enough this season. There's definite risk in that position, especially since Gibson won't be ready to step in this year. I'd feel a lot better about where the starters are if we had BOTH Gibson and Hendriks waiting in AAA if Baker has arm trouble, Marquis is ineffective, or Pavano finally runs out of gas. But it's not an unreasonable risk.
jmlease, excellent post! And Fanatic Jack, perhaps it isn't a question of us "protecting" the Pohlads. Maybe we disagree with your incredibly negative opinions.
I recall, in 1987, many negative opinions when they marched out Les Straker as the #3 starter. Les friggin' Straker! I could probably find you a post or two from that spring proclaiming a distinct possibility of that rotation have the potential of going down as the WORST ROTATION IN BASEBALL HISTORY!!!
Do you work for the Twins?? Before you criticize my thoughts think about this. Would cutting payroll after losing 99 games be acceptable in NY, Boston, Phily, LA, or even Detroit. The answer is no way in million years. The reason why because fans and sports writers would go after the front office. I just don't understand why fans are not more outraged by a team that did absolutly nothing to improve itself. I guess we should just be happy because the Twins are still in Minnesota. Sorry that is not good enough for me. Welcome to the 90's all over again and the fans are buying it hook, line, and sinker..
This: "The front office didn't focus much on adding reinforcements during the offseason, signing only one new player who figures to be the fifth starter. Instead, they'll rely on improved health, effectiveness and accountability from the incumbents."is all you need to know. They basically have no plan, but are simply hoping and praying the guys they had are better than they have shown in the past. It may be even worse than last year, when you consider the lack of reinforcements at AAA this year. Other than Hendricks, who are the Twins hoping to get help from if, or rather when a couple of these guys fail or get hurt? Is anyone really comfortable with the fact they are thinking of using Maloney and Swarzak as their 4 and 5 to start the year...making an already questionable bullpen even more questionable?
I'll take this a step further, if the Twins had been willing to spend even couple million more they could have landed someone like Eric Bedard, or Chis Capuano instead of Jason Marquis. Both are injury risks (just like Marquis) but both have a much higher upside. I'd go so far as to say they would have been better off adding the 2 million they spent on Carroll to what they spent on Marquis and sticking with Dozier at SS. Oh, by the way Colon signed for 1.5 million. The Twins couldn't have "stretched" to give him 2 million? Sure he's a risk, but he was also darn effective last year.
My gripe is that if they hadn't been so married to the guys that have proved to be questionable or ineffective in the past, they could have certainly improved. It's almost as if they didn't try.