-
12-13-2012, 07:20 PM #1Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 569
The 4-letter network's Hall of 100
Anyone else been following this?
ESPN's Hall of 100 -- Ranking the all-time greatest MLB players - ESPN
I'm still working my way through it. I'm disagreeing less than I thought I might be.
So far the only egregious error is Reggie Jackson at #55. May be the most overrated player in baseball history, criminally silly to have him that high.
-
12-13-2012, 07:43 PM #2
Killebrew at 64, Blyleven at like 71, Molitor at 77. But no Puckett??
-
12-13-2012, 07:48 PM #3Senior Member Triple-A
- Posts
- 370
Too many recent players. Rivera on the list is a joke. Bonds is too high. Aaron is too low (guy was a machine). No Puckett, but Edgar Martinez?
-
12-13-2012, 08:07 PM #4
-
12-13-2012, 08:16 PM #5Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 569
---Yeah the Puckett omission would be defensible if they had put another great outfielder over him. But Edgar, though he could mash, was just a DH. If you want to be considered one of the top players ever, you should be able to at least competently field a position.
-
12-14-2012, 09:09 AM #6Banned All-Star
- Posts
- 1,362
Haven't followed it. ESPN has become really bad the last few years, esp to baseball. Lots of better places around. I think I stopped going there when they revamped their message boards.
-
12-14-2012, 09:25 AM #7
-
12-14-2012, 10:13 AM #8
-
12-14-2012, 11:24 AM #9
-
12-14-2012, 02:33 PM #10Senior Member Triple-A
- Posts
- 236
Wow that is tedious. Here is a list:
ESPN "Hall of 100"
-
12-14-2012, 03:43 PM #11Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 569
---If you re-read my comments, I think you'll see I was going beyond 'quibbling' in my disagreement with putting Jackson at #55. I don't think he belongs in the top 155.
But that aside, you know what's unproductive? Polluting a thread with snide comments belittling the topic.
The TD crew included rule #5 in the proposed comment policy to address this exact behavior because it was happening so much and it drags down the quality of the discourse.
If you don't feel that player rankings are worth discussing, then simply don't participate in the discussion. Move along and find a thread on a topic you feel is worthwhile.
-
12-14-2012, 03:58 PM #12Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 569
Guys ranked too high:
1) Reggie Jackson (55)
2) Pedro Martinez (41)
3) Chipper Jones (49)
4) Ivan Rodriguez (71)
5) Alex Rodriguez (18) - roid issues aside
Guys who are ranked too low
1) Mike Piazza (78)
2) Rod Carew (53)
3) Carlton Fisk (76)
-
12-14-2012, 04:24 PM #13
-
12-14-2012, 04:58 PM #14
The biggest travesty is Jackie Robinson, at #52, between Rod Carew and Ernie Banks. His place, as a historic icon, is in the top 10. My other icon, Roberto Clemente is #33. Someday I hope Clemente's #21 hangs in every ballpark alongside #42. These two men made historic contributions, that exceeded their excellence on the field.
-
12-14-2012, 07:01 PM #15Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 793
If you didn't read the reactions of @OldHossRadbourn on twitter you are doing it wrong.
Papers...business papers.
-
12-14-2012, 08:42 PM #16
In just isolating pitchers it looks weighted to recent performances and longevity. (44) Sandy Koufax and (32) Bob Gibson being so significantly down the list from (7) Clemens is plain wrong. (100) Phi Niekro and (79) Robin Roberts also seem to be concessions to longevity.
-
12-14-2012, 09:31 PM #17
-
12-15-2012, 12:44 AM #18
-
12-16-2012, 04:48 PM #19
-
12-16-2012, 04:49 PM #20



1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote

Examining Oswaldo Arcia's recent struggles
Figuring hitters out, a baseball lifer told me recently, is like trying to untangle a giant knot. At first you just try to attack it in the easiest manner possible. If that does not work, you pick...
Today, 01:06 AM