Thread: How much slack do you cut them?

My displeasure for Gardy's management increases with every game that Clete Thomas is in the starting lineup.

Originally Posted by JB_Iowa

I don't cut them much slack. I really think that this franchise is stagnant and would like to see some infusions of new talent in the front office and coaching ranks.

They had a good run over a 10-year period but they seem almost too comfortable with one another. Just as they did in the early 2000's, the franchise needs to come up with a strategy for competing with middling resources. (Not as low-budget as they once were but without the high-flying local TV revenues that some franchises enjoy.)

Franchise just seems stale.

I used this quote because it's in this thread...but I see this sentiment a fair amount. And I just don't get it. Specifically the "they had a good 10-year run BUT" part. I don't understand how a ten-year run gets dismissed after ONE bad year. They won the division in 2010...handily. That was one full season ago. They were decimated by injuries (and yes, other things went wrong too, before people go nuts) and had an awful year last year. I just don't understand the mentality that's so quick to seemingly brush aside ten years because of one.

Originally Posted by CDog

I used this quote because it's in this thread...but I see this sentiment a fair amount. And I just don't get it. Specifically the "they had a good 10-year run BUT" part. I don't understand how a ten-year run gets dismissed after ONE bad year. They won the division in 2010...handily. That was one full season ago. They were decimated by injuries (and yes, other things went wrong too, before people go nuts) and had an awful year last year. I just don't understand the mentality that's so quick to seemingly brush aside ten years because of one.

It's called the bandwagon Cdog and right now it's jump off time for the minions who need someone to blame.

Originally Posted by CDog

I used this quote because it's in this thread...but I see this sentiment a fair amount. And I just don't get it. Specifically the "they had a good 10-year run BUT" part. I don't understand how a ten-year run gets dismissed after ONE bad year. They won the division in 2010...handily. That was one full season ago. They were decimated by injuries (and yes, other things went wrong too, before people go nuts) and had an awful year last year. I just don't understand the mentality that's so quick to seemingly brush aside ten years because of one.

It was actually an 8-year run.

Originally Posted by Gernzy

Yes the team is somewhat rebuilding, but we still have the pieces to be somewhat competitive. I don't see us making the playoffs, but .500 isn't out of the question. The front office isn't to blame. No they didn't not get any big name pitchers in the off-season, but when have they ever? This is not a team thats going to throw 50 million at a pitcher. As already said losing Baker and Liriano being a joke is killing us. If our starting pitching gets it under control, which I am seeing start to happen with most of them, we should be fine.

I agree 100% Gernzy. No need to press the panic button. That was last year. This year is about making improvements and find out who can play. The offseason additions are looking good. Liriano has been a disaster every 5th day. Time to address that and if Valencia continues to struggle with quality ab's he might soon start to see less playing time.

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

It was actually an 8-year run.

Fair enough (although I'd say nine...'02 to '10 is nine). But I was going with the sentiment expressed in the quote that I quoted. Or something like that.

Originally Posted by Fanatic Jack

Nick,

Your facts are about as accurate as Cliff Cleavin. You demanded Liriano be signed to a 3-year deal after the 2010 season. Do you still remember that or just choose to forget. Your right it's not Gardy's fault for losing 12 straight playoff games in a row, a 24-68 lifetime record vs the Yankees, or that he coddled his players so much last year people just asked to sit the bench. We have the worst manager and coaching staff in MLB and it's not even close. Liriano is screwed up because of them telling him to "pitch to contact." Why make changes when the team is losing? It's just a rebuilding year and fans should accept it. This makes a lot of sense and would never fly in NY, LA, Boston, or even Detroit. My last point is Gardy has coached the most talented players in Twins history since 2002 and has accomplished nothing. Sorry but a cheap divsion tiltle (worst division in MLB from 2002-2007) does not mean anything. The fans were promised a better product and you defend them because of a tough schedule. I have never heard Texas complain about their schedule.

Posts like this drive me nuts. Lots of silly accusations that can't be proven (Twins ruined Liriano), that have been rebutted or useless stats not relevant to our team -what's our record vs AL central teams that we play 18x year as opposed to the Yanks, who we play 6 or times? The AL central was not a cheap division when we were winning it - the 06 Central had 3 teams win 90 games and it was the reining WS champion White Sox who came in third. If that ever happens in the AL east, ESPN will produce a 2 hour long documentary about it. It wasn't that long ago that the Rangers finished 21 GB, in second place no less, in the AL West with a losing record.

"Gardy has coached the most talented players in Twins history since 2002 and has accomplished nothing." Where to begin? First, I guess he's also couched the least talented players in Twins history since 2002. And to say we've accomplished nothing is sad. They've won a lot and done it with far less than most other teams. It's incredible that some Twins fans seem to think all those division titles, wins and development of MVPs, Cy Young winners, all-stars and solid trades meant nothing. The Twins have lost 5 playoffs in a row b/c they haven't been the best team. It's pretty simple. The Twins teams avg about 92 wins, the teams we've played in the first round avg about 101 wins. People are shocked that an 87 win team (pitching Baker in game 163) lost 3 straight to a 103 win Yankee team that won the WS?

None of that means that this years team shouldn't be criticized. I already mentioned my thoughts/concerns but early panicking doesn't seem necessary yet. I'm hopeful that this team finishes over .500 but I don't think it will. I suspect we'll finish with something around 70 wins and come in fourth. But they've only played 16 games.

Originally Posted by gunnarthor

Posts like this drive me nuts. Lots of silly accusations that can't be proven (Twins ruined Liriano), that have been rebutted or useless stats not relevant to our team -what's our record vs AL central teams that we play 18x year as opposed to the Yanks, who we play 6 or times? The AL central was not a cheap division when we were winning it - the 06 Central had 3 teams win 90 games and it was the reining WS champion White Sox who came in third. If that ever happens in the AL east, ESPN will produce a 2 hour long documentary about it. It wasn't that long ago that the Rangers finished 21 GB, in second place no less, in the AL West with a losing record.

"Gardy has coached the most talented players in Twins history since 2002 and has accomplished nothing." Where to begin? First, I guess he's also couched the least talented players in Twins history since 2002. And to say we've accomplished nothing is sad. They've won a lot and done it with far less than most other teams. It's incredible that some Twins fans seem to think all those division titles, wins and development of MVPs, Cy Young winners, all-stars and solid trades meant nothing. The Twins have lost 5 playoffs in a row b/c they haven't been the best team. It's pretty simple. The Twins teams avg about 92 wins, the teams we've played in the first round avg about 101 wins. People are shocked that an 87 win team (pitching Baker in game 163) lost 3 straight to a 103 win Yankee team that won the WS?

None of that means that this years team shouldn't be criticized. I already mentioned my thoughts/concerns but early panicking doesn't seem necessary yet. I'm hopeful that this team finishes over .500 but I don't think it will. I suspect we'll finish with something around 70 wins and come in fourth. But they've only played 16 games.

+1...........Jack, the Yankees were just better. Joe Torre did not win the games, his players did, all he needed to do was put the right ones out there and get out of their way. Gardy did exactly the same thing, they just didn't win.

The problem is the cupboards have been getting bare for the last few years and getting nothing for guys like Santana and Garza didn't help, that lies with Bill Smith.

For all the fire Gardy crew out there, what specifically should he have done last year and for the start of this year that would have resulted in more wins?

Completely agree. People need to stop calling for Gardy's head. He's doing the best with what we have.

And PLEASE STOP comparing us to Boston LA or New York. We are NOT any of those cities, and never will be. We are a mid-market team at best. We are not going to sign huge free-agent contracts. We will not have a payroll in the top 5. This are things Twins fans have come to deal with. The last few years the WS has been won by teams very similar to us. It can be done.

For those of you who think I'm a bandwagon jumper, you are dead wrong. I've been a Twins fans since 1965 (sorry, they didn't impinge on my conciousness until I was about 10).

I didn't call for anyone's head specifically. But what I see in this franchise front office and coaching staff is stagnation -- very, very little turnover. While stability is good, a failure to infuse an organization with new talent and ideas -- even at the very highest levels -- can lead to complacency.

And I'm afraid that is what is happening here. For all their accomplishments over the last decade, they HAVEN'T won a playoff game in recent memory and their record against the A.L. East has gone from 91-80 in 2002-2006 to 66-95 in 2007-2011.

So not everything is as rosy as you would think. My first response to this thread has nothing to do with their record this year. And, surprisingly, not all that much to do with 2011. It has a lot to do with how I felt on October 10, 2010 when it FINALLY hit me in the face that some major changes needed to be made if the Twins were ever going to compete in the postseason. I really didn't have very high expectations for last year or this year. Admittedly, I didn't anticipate that last year would be quite as bad as it was but I knew that there would be a dropoff.

The 2010 team won 94 games and still couldn't win a playoff game (we're talking game here not series) and had a 14-17 regular season record against the A.L. East. I find that depressing -- and nothing that has happened since then has changed my assessment.

They are stuck in a rut.

Originally Posted by JB_Iowa

The 2010 team won 94 games and still couldn't win a playoff game (we're talking game here not series) and had a 14-17 regular season record against the A.L. East. I find that depressing -- and nothing that has happened since then has changed my assessment.
They are stuck in a rut.

Some Twins fans are too stuck on the AL East thing. In 07 we finished under .500 yet had a winning record against the AL East. 31 games out of 162 isn't significant enough to worry about. Yes, it would have been nice if our Twins had won that series. Liriano and Crain gave away Game 1, Pettitte killed us in game 2 and Duensing was starting game 3 in NY. It happens. Strong LH pitchers, like CC and Pettitte, aren't a good matchup for us.

I think the front office definately deserves some heat since they havent truly addressed the pitching problem. The Twins pitchers had solid years in 09 & 10 and they felt that was good enough. Yet after they got swept from the playoffs both years, they didnt go out and get an ace to anchor this rotation. We all saw what Johan used to do when we would go into New York and take Game 1. Thats what we needed and for some reason they settled for a bunch of #3 starters to carry us through a decent year.

Gardy has done the best he could with some of these players that were dumped on him over the years.

This next month is crucial. Gotta take 2 out of 3 against these subpar teams now that the meatgrinder of a schedule is over with.

Originally Posted by stringer bell

The schedule early is truly brutal. Perhaps the Twins will catch a break because the RSox are in disarray right now, but something tells me they will get well soon, as will the Angels. Certainly, the starting pitching has been below par and prospects aren't that great for the immediate future.

I do think patience for the players is in order. A good series can change stats in a hurry. While Doumit hasn't been great, he drove in seven runs on the road trip. Just an example of how numbers even out.

Currently, the scapegoats are the bottom of the order--Valencia, Thomas, Casilla, plus Liriano. I think the position players should be given more time, but the lousy starting pitching that Liriano has served up really sucks the life out of the team.

I think you are right in terms of trying to project out how many losses this team will have when it's not even the end of APRIL yet. With the exception of Baltimore, you couldn't have drawn up more of a "murderer's row" schedule for this particular franchise in the early going. They haven't even played anyone in their own division yet. And while lots of teams aren't as sharp in April as they are in July, you could argue that in addition to the new faces, Mauer and Morneau (if healthy) would be more formidable in the dog days of summer than coming off of two injury plagued years.

That being said, I think we should be taking notice of the fact that everyone has said "As Mauer and Morneau go, so go the Twins", yet here we are a few weeks in with Mauer and Morneau playing about as well as could reasonably be expected (and Willingham playing out of his mind), and the team is 5-11. The starting pitching was always going to be the issue for this team. Even if everyone in the lineup exceeded expectations, we still lack the firepower to trade blows with the better teams in the AL. And when Baker goes down for the year and your supposed best pitcher (Liriano) can't even give you a chance in any of his games, well, the writing is on the wall.

Originally Posted by JB_Iowa

For those of you who think I'm a bandwagon jumper, you are dead wrong. I've been a Twins fans since 1965 (sorry, they didn't impinge on my conciousness until I was about 10).

I didn't call for anyone's head specifically. But what I see in this franchise front office and coaching staff is stagnation -- very, very little turnover. While stability is good, a failure to infuse an organization with new talent and ideas -- even at the very highest levels -- can lead to complacency.

And I'm afraid that is what is happening here. For all their accomplishments over the last decade, they HAVEN'T won a playoff game in recent memory and their record against the A.L. East has gone from 91-80 in 2002-2006 to 66-95 in 2007-2011.

So not everything is as rosy as you would think. My first response to this thread has nothing to do with their record this year. And, surprisingly, not all that much to do with 2011. It has a lot to do with how I felt on October 10, 2010 when it FINALLY hit me in the face that some major changes needed to be made if the Twins were ever going to compete in the postseason. I really didn't have very high expectations for last year or this year. Admittedly, I didn't anticipate that last year would be quite as bad as it was but I knew that there would be a dropoff.

The 2010 team won 94 games and still couldn't win a playoff game (we're talking game here not series) and had a 14-17 regular season record against the A.L. East. I find that depressing -- and nothing that has happened since then has changed my assessment.

They are stuck in a rut.

No, they just weren't as good as the team who beat them. A team that wins 94 games doesn't all of a sudden get complacent, they just got beat. You overestimate the influence the manager has on the game in the playoffs, Gardy was a good enough manager to win 94 games that year, tell me what changed come playoff time? What did he do wrong? Nothing in my mind, the players just didn't get it done, it happens.

I cut them some slack due to injury (Baker and less so Blackburn) and accident (Marquis). Those breaks aren't on anyone, and appreciate that Ryan told Marquis to go and take as much time with his daughter as needed.

I cut no slack on Liriano, either to the pitcher himself or to staff. If his problems are upstairs, then he needs a sports psychologist or someone who can motivate him. But it has been too long, and something needs to happen. Cutting slack is what they have been doing thus far with Liriano, and it doesn't work when something needs to change.

I thought the Clete Thomas pickup was great, except that they are playing him regularly. I don't know what the story is with Plouffe, but if he's on the roster, play him in RF and let him prove he belongs or not. Clete Thomas should be the 4th-5th OFer, not the 3rd.

Valencia needs to step up as well, but if he doesn't, it isn't like they have a good 3B solution waiting in the wings.

Casilla needs to step up or Dozier gets his shot. We'll see how this plays out, so I guess I'm cutting slack there, as long as they have a plan for a decision on that point.

I didn't think they would compete this year, so they need to make decisions. Liriano is making that decision easier. Play Plouffe regularly so you can make a decision on him. Casilla's clock is running. Valencia's is probably running too. If they get answers to these question marks, then I'm ok with this season tanking.

I also am assuming they will sign a FA pitcher this offseason who is better than a Marquis-level starter. Rotation next year: FA signee, Pavano (give him a 1 or 2 year deal if he gives us another year like the last 1-2), Blackburn, Hendriks, Gibson. If they sign 2 pitchers, great, but that's a pipe dream, so I'll cut slack assuming they'll sign 1. If they don't sign 1, then I have no idea what they are doing.

The tricky thing about Free Agents is that a lot of teams are now locking up their young talent before they get a chance to test the market - (not to mention the fact that the Twins are rarely active Free Agent buyers).

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/0...ee-agents.html Looking at the potential 2013 free agent class, there are some options, though I would be surprised if the Twins were in on any of the big arms.

The 2012 team is the 2012 team. Let's see what happens. I think TR did pretty good replacing depth given is parameters.

I have one major concern with the Twins. That's the lack of near MLB talent on the farm. Watching the farm system fall to its current level under Bill Smith was the nightmare. Players given away in trades with no restocking. This is what has the Twins in the current situation.

The Twins won't sign Albert Pujols and his ilk. The farm system is they key to long term success. The farm system was the pride of baseball under TR. It fed our squad. Under Bill Smith it all collapsed. We have some talent at the lower levels but that will take some time.

I don't know who to blame. Bill Smith was the GM but who really knows.

Originally Posted by twinsnorth49

No, they just weren't as good as the team who beat them. A team that wins 94 games doesn't all of a sudden get complacent, they just got beat. You overestimate the influence the manager has on the game in the playoffs, Gardy was a good enough manager to win 94 games that year, tell me what changed come playoff time? What did he do wrong? Nothing in my mind, the players just didn't get it done, it happens.

WHERE if anywhere did I blame this all on Gardenhire?

I have said -- repeatedly -- that I believe that the front office and coaching staffs are stagnant and that they would benefit from an infusion of new energy, talent and ideas.

That doesn't necessarily mean Gardenhire. It could mean him. It could mean Rick Anderson. It could mean Joe Vavra. It could mean Terry Ryan. It could mean Rob Antony or Jim Rantz or Mike Radcliff or Deron Johnson. Or some combination of them or others.

It's nice that they all like working for the Twins so much that they basically just stay. But usually organizations evolve and you have people who move on to new (usually better) positions in other organizations. The Twins staff doesn't really seem to do that. I didn't go back today and look at the leadership personnel (on and off the field) for each year but I have done so in the past. It has moved beyond stable to stagnant. Unless you infuse new energy and ideas on a fairly regular basis, you often fall into a type of group think (I'd call it a rut) where you just keep doing what you've been doing. You don't challenge each other's assumptions because you are so used to working with one another.

And, unfortunately, I think that is what is happening with the Twins. (And as for their playoff failure, they need to look at their pitching first -- from who they draft through the way they handle them).

So, my response to Thrylos' thread is in some ways premature -- I don't really care if they make changes in response to what has happened this year, it is pretty much what I expected. But I've been waiting to see an infusion of new ideas, talent and energy at the coaching and front office levels for several years -- and what I see is merely recycling.

Originally Posted by JB_Iowa

For those of you who think I'm a bandwagon jumper, you are dead wrong.

To be clear, since I had quoted your previous post, I tried to make it obvious that that's NOT what I was saying at the start of my post. Yours happened to be the one I reacted too, but I don't think my disagreement makes you or anyone else a bandwagon jumper. I don't agree with the notion, but that's why there are discussions and stuff...people have different ideas. And not to speak for others, but I think some of the more feisty posts on the contrary to the "hot seat" side were in reply to someone else's posts.

Originally Posted by StormJH1

That being said, I think we should be taking notice of the fact that everyone has said "As Mauer and Morneau go, so go the Twins", yet here we are a few weeks in with Mauer and Morneau playing about as well as could reasonably be expected (and Willingham playing out of his mind), and the team is 5-11.

From a post I mostly agreed with, I took out the part I didn't above. I think a lot of people have said that "as they go, so go the Twins." For me personally, it wasn't quite that cut and dry. But that's really semantics. The part I would actually argue is that Mauer's numbers are quite a bit below both his career averages and where I expect he'll finish. I think most of that is based on a slow start, and after those first four or five games he has done about what is expected.