J.J. Hardy

As I was reading mlbtraderumors.com, came across a quote from Buck Showalter that I really liked. When asked about the possibility of trading JJ Hardy, Showalter responded "what word is about "overwhelmed?" It just gets me mad thinking about the Twins trading JJ for basically nothing. I hated the trade at the time and really hate it now. My question is what would make the Twins trade him and get such little in return? I realize he didn't have a great year, but shortstops that hit for power and have a solid glove still have value. The Twins traded him at his lowest possible value. Money I think had a little to do with it. However, I have got a pretty good hunch Gardy was the one pushing hard for them to trade him. He doesn't like middle infielders that can't run or obviously ones that can hit for power lol. But seriously, I don't think anyone could have won with the product on the field the last two years. But I do think Gardy has quite a bit of say on most of the roster decisions. He is directly responsible for giving Alexi Casilla 15 chances at a starting gig. Anyone who thinks you can lose two good up the middle defenders like Hudson and Hardy and replace them with Alexi Casilla and Nishioka and not have a setback in wins should be examined. Anyways, just thought I would vent a little on that subject:mad: Thoughts?

My thought is that Hudson got us a great draft pick (Travis Harrison) and I think most if not all twins fans were pretty excited about Nishi until he didn't work out. It's easy to say now that it was a mistake but it was popular at the time, sometimes it just doesn't work out (seems more often as a twins fan). I wish we would have kept Hardy but he probably wouldn't have put up those numbers here because the twins didn't want him pulling the ball all time.

My thought is that it's now 2013, and high time to stop whining about moves made in 2010 that didn't work out.

At this point you might as well be complaining about Bruno-for-Herr.

I agree, I wish we never had to trade Santana, I wish we would have kept Dickey, I wish, I wish, I wish................nope, not working.

Hindsight, alwasy 20/20.

Everyone was upset about trading Hardy. I think we were even more upset at that then the Corriea signing. Cause both obviously meant punting the next season. But the Hardy trade was a long time ago and we have moved on. I think we were more curious than excited about Nishioka when we signed him. We were excited in that we actually signed a Japenese player but when we saw that signing also meant the end of Hardy being here I think that tempered any excitement that signing could have and changed it to I hope he doesn't suck which he did.

At this point I am hopeful the Twins still sign a pitcher or Johnson or Sanchez or a backup OF or even Inge. Someone they can flip for a monorleaguer later.

After 2010 it was well known that Mauer would be a free agent and that the Twins had to be truly aggressive in their offer so as to re-sign Mauer. It was also known that much of the bullpen's contracts would also have to be renegotiated--but that Nathan's injury prevented any trade. The Pohlads weren't going to expand the payroll to "make everybody happy"--so some "had to go". Hardy was one of them. I think the rest of BB realized the Twins were in "salary dump mode" and took advantage. Why Hardy? I think he was in Gardenhire's doghouse because trading him for such a dubious return and then spending so much to acquire Nishioka (whose photograph is next to 'dubious' in the dictionary) confirms it wasn't just for salary reduction--there was "something else" going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by luke829

Hindsight, alwasy 20/20.

---

There was no hindsight required to see that the Hardy trade was pure **** right from day one.

The Trade was Terrible... No Doubt about it...

Sometimes you're the Louisville Slugger and Sometimes you're the ball...

Sometimes it all comes together.

Bill Smith has been removed from the OM position.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kwak

After 2010 it was well known that Mauer would be a free agent and that the Twins had to be truly aggressive in their offer so as to re-sign Mauer

---

Mauer signed his extension in March of 2010.

Nishioka didn't have anything to do with the Hardy trade. The plan was always to have T-Nish play second. Hardy was traded because Gardy didn't like him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

Nishioka didn't have anything to do with the Hardy trade. The plan was always to have T-Nish play second. Hardy was traded because Gardy didn't like him.

---

Yep, and Gardy wanted Casilla for his shortstop.

I think the animosity was probably overblown seeing as Gardy gets along with most hard working players, and Hardy seems to be that kind of guy but the hitting philosophies of the two (or maybe just Vavra) certainly didn't mesh. The Twins wanted Hardy to hit to all fields while Hardy wanted to get around on everything and drive them to LF.

What sucks was, only a year later the Twins must have realized Hardy's preference was the correct one for right-handed hitters at Target Field because they let Willingham and Plouffe have a go at Hardy's approach.

I think we might be getting a bit carried away with this. Hardy was due something like 6m and the team couldn't spend enough to keep Hardy, Thome and Pavano. Hardy was always dinged up a bit - he only started 95 games for us - and asked out of the lineup a lot leaving us with a 24 man bench. His defense was good but dWAR, for instance, showed him declining three years in a row. He wasn't killing it with the bat for us - Alexi Casilla actually had a higher OBP, SLG and OPS+ and was younger. The team decided to go with a MI of Nishi and Casilla. Obviously, that worked out.

Everyone in baseball knew that Hardy was available but Baltimore seemed to be the only team interested in him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Celebrity Weddings!

Mauer signed his extension in March of 2010.

---

December 2010,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kwak

December 2010,

---

Let me google that for you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gunnarthor

I think we might be getting a bit carried away with this. Hardy was due something like 6m and the team couldn't spend enough to keep Hardy, Thome and Pavano. Hardy was always dinged up a bit - he only started 95 games for us - and asked out of the lineup a lot leaving us with a 24 man bench. His defense was good but dWAR, for instance, showed him declining three years in a row. He wasn't killing it with the bat for us - Alexi Casilla actually had a higher OBP, SLG and OPS+ and was younger. The team decided to go with a MI of Nishi and Casilla. Obviously, that worked out.

Everyone in baseball knew that Hardy was available but Baltimore seemed to be the only team interested in him.

---

Yep, right on. the primary reasons were:
1) Cost-cutting, after signing Nishioka.
2) He was fairly expensive and coming off of a couple of pretty bad years. He was also perceived as fragile.
3) There is a lot of 20/20 hindsight going on. He was not overly valued by anyone, as is seen by what Baltimore nabbed him for.
4) The Twins wanted to add speed.

At the time, I think I wrote that this was fair accomopli once they decided to go for Nishioka. They weren't going to pay for both. And I continue to believe that the Nishioka signing was more business-driven than team-driven. They were trying to expand their revenue base into Asia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kwak

December 2010,

---

Nope. It was March. Unless after your comma you meant to write "was nine months after Mauer signed his extension."

I was ecstatic when we traded for him and royally ticked off when he was traded away. No hindsight for me. And Hardy was trade before Nishi signed. And it was Gardy who specifically said he wanted speed.

Hardy had an OPS over .800 in the 2nd half and had the best UZR/150 for starting shortstops.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by John Bonnes

They were trying to expand their revenue base into Asia.

---

Can you explain further about how this would work? I was under the impression that sales of Twins merchandise were part of the shared revenue pot, though I'm happy to be corrected on that point. Would they be able to get some more money from Japanese stations picking up Twins' broadcasts?