With the trade of revere what are the chances they are players in the michael bourn sweepstakes?
Printable View
With the trade of revere what are the chances they are players in the michael bourn sweepstakes?
Zero. That would be awful. Spend money on pitching and middle infielders. Arcia, Benson, Hicks, and Mastrioanni give the Twins some OF options at the league minimum.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnyMagic
No, the Revere deal allows the Twins to spend more on the top starter that they target. That's still priority #1, #2, and #3 this offseason.
Zilch.
None. Not a fit and not gonna happen.
Are there any vet CF out there who might be had for a 1 year deal? Seems like that would be a good option given Hicks wasn't exactly expected to start this early.
I've always liked Reed Johnson as righty platoon player. There really isn't any reason to have Hicks stay in the minors too long and it's really time for Benson to sink or swim so I expect one of them to be up opening day now. RJ would still be nice to have on the bench though.
Maybe it's just me but I like The Italian Job as a fourth outfielder. He's almost perfect in that role.Quote:
Originally Posted by kab21
Right about that one Brock!Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock BeauchampMaybe it's just me but I like The Italian Job as a fourth outfielder. He's almost perfect in that role.Quote:
Originally Posted by kab21
I mean, with the outfield market for Bourn shrunk to nearly nothing, if the Twins put out a one-year offer that isn't worth too much but enough for him to consider it, would it be that bad if they signed him for one year until our outfield prospects are more major-league ready?
Doesn't mean you can't have a good hitter on the bench regardless of position although I guess that's impossible if the Twins are carrying a backup 3B along with a futility IF'er and futility catcher.
Or even 2 years. Mastro is strictly 4th-outfielder material, and it's a risk to assume the minors will produce both the starters needed even in 2014. (Parmelee seems miscast in RF and will take over 1B in 2014 probably.) Aim for serious contention in 2015, with 2014 as the transition year.Quote:
Originally Posted by husker brian
Trading Revere frees up less than a million, to be replaced presumably by someone at half a million - how does this allow the Twins to spend what it takes to get a top starter?Quote:
Originally Posted by kab21
Also going with Zero. We shouldn't be spending on the infield, we definitely shouldn't on the outfield.
Less then ZERO!!!
Still need another option at 3B(Hannahan likely) and SS....my guess is Dozier will get every opp at 2B cuz I think we all believe he will hit. Throw in 2 more starters and another BP arm and let's play.
They don't need to spend 5-8M/yr to get a #3/#4 starter now. that money can now be focused on the top starter with lesser needs elsewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by ashburyjohnTrading Revere frees up less than a million, to be replaced presumably by someone at half a million - how does this allow the Twins to spend what it takes to get a top starter?Quote:
Originally Posted by kab21
Zero......paying max type money on a guy who uses his legs exclusively is a high risk & teams are obviously nervous with him as he's still out there.
If we wanted to go after a high priced OF we would be better served trading Willingham away for Pitching/MI help and buying "low" on Josh Hamilton
Not that it would ever happen, but it would make infinitely more sense then going after Bourn.
He's a Boras client. Never gonna happen