Thread: Article: Contemplating Bringing Scott Baker Back

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?11...ott-Baker-back

The only thing i remember about Scott Baker is he is great when their is no pressure. Maybe a 1 yr 3 million deal would work.

I would like to see Bake back next year. He actually has some upside and would sign for a reasonable 1 year deal, perhaps with an option or two.

Assuming they sign him, I'd like to see the Twins get creative in how they limit innings for him as well as Gibson. I would recommend going with a 6 man staff, but not a 6 guys taking each turn type of rotation. I would do:

Normal 5 man rotation type workload:
#1 FA Signing (Marcum, Sanchez, whomever they sign from that 2nd tier group)
#2 Diamond

Take 3 out of every 4 turns in a normal 5 man rotation:
Baker
Gibson
Hendricks
Deduno

Basically keep 4 guys on your 25 roster to take up those 3-5 spots in the rotation. It would slightly limit your bullpen, but having a 12 man bullpen is over-kill anyway. This would result in the FA signing & Diamond getting 33 starts and the other 4 guys getting 24. Obviously injuries would play a part. but this plan would keep the young & recovering arms to around 160 innings instead of 200+.

Originally Posted by AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

The only thing i remember about Scott Baker is he is great when their is no pressure. Maybe a 1 yr 3 million deal would work.

There's nothing wrong with bringing him back on a one year deal with incentives, just as long as he's not counted on as one of the three pitchers Ryan says he needs to find in the offseason.

But that won't happen. The Twins would absolutely count on him to duplicate his best season, and if/when he gets hurt, they'll probably misdiagnose it again, and he'll end up missing half the season or more, again. When that happens, there will be no backup plan in place, and Ryan will try to wave away the injury as both unforeseeable and unpreventable. And when the fan base questions the credibility of a front office that obtuse, Ryan will politely instruct them to shut up and eat their seven dollar bratwursts.

Would Baker want to come back? They (the Twins) never seemed too thrilled with him while he was healthy and called him out in the media at the very time they couldn't figure out he needed TJ procedure. Not to mention other teams will surely show interest in his services.

I hope they say goodbye. He's never been durable, or as you mention been an innnigs eater. At this time I think they're better off with some of their younger guys or just about anything else. Truth be told, the guy could flat out dominate at times and I wouldn't be the least bit suprised if he comes back strong. But is it worth paying and waiting and hoping?

I would put odds at 95% the Twins don't offer him anything after they reject his option.

I am convinced Baker will be back--and will count as one of three "new" pitchers referenced. Let's face quality pitchers will not be eager to play for the Twins next season and it appears that Baker is interested (at least) to stay.

How is bringing Baker back at the right price not a good idea? So he's had some health issues, so have lots of guys.

Originally Posted by Kwak

I am convinced Baker will be back--and will count as one of three "new" pitchers referenced. Let's face quality pitchers will not be eager to play for the Twins next season and it appears that Baker is interested (at least) to stay.

So...Baker, Gibson, Diamond, Marcum (maube) and maybe, Deduno?

any rotation that is nothing but a bunch of names from this organization is a failure. They need new pitchers.

They can guarantee his return by picking up the option. At one year, I would pay the premium to guarantee he is on the roster.

I would not count on his public comments that he would like to return as a sign that the Twins can get him at a bargain price.

My guess is his agent will push for him to go elsewhere once the option is declined. It is very rare for a player to have an option declined and then return to the same team at a bargain rate.

There are only two rock-solid sure things we can count on right now regarding this rotation:

1. Scott Diamond will be back
2. Nick Blackburn will be given every opportunity to make it back onto the 40-man roster

I doubt we'll see Gibson until mid-June, to avoid Super-2 status on him. If the comments of Ryan are to be taken seriously, and they are targeting adding three pitchers, Baker will likely be one of the three. Marcum would be a typical Twins-type acquisition, and I'd be fine with that. I also wouldn't be surprised to see Ryan count another year from Pavano as one of the three. I'm not so enthused about that choice, as he wasn't too effective this year before the injury.

So, don't be surprised to see your 2013 Twins' opening day roster of starters to be Marcum, Diamond, Baker, Pavano and Blackburn (with Deduno back in Rochester working on his control and Hendricks waiting for an injury or for the inevitable Blackburn-sucks demotion to occur).

Originally Posted by Teddy

There are only two rock-solid sure things we can count on right now regarding this rotation:

1. Scott Diamond will be back
2. Nick Blackburn will be given every opportunity to make it back onto the 40-man roster

I doubt we'll see Gibson until mid-June, to avoid Super-2 status on him. If the comments of Ryan are to be taken seriously, and they are targeting adding three pitchers, Baker will likely be one of the three. Marcum would be a typical Twins-type acquisition, and I'd be fine with that. I also wouldn't be surprised to see Ryan count another year from Pavano as one of the three. I'm not so enthused about that choice, as he wasn't too effective this year before the injury.

So, don't be surprised to see your 2013 Twins' opening day roster of starters to be Marcum, Diamond, Baker, Pavano and Blackburn (with Deduno back in Rochester working on his control and Hendricks waiting for an injury or for the inevitable Blackburn-sucks demotion to occur).

I think you're on the right track but I don't think we'll see Pavano back on the team. Maybe someone like him but not Carl himself. As a second or third FA option, I'm not against that kind of pick-up as long as the org picks up a legitimate free agent alongside him.

I doubt we'll see Blackburn back on the 40 man unless he absolutely shuts down Spring Training hitters (I mean, really shuts them down). Teams don't take guys off the 40 man without the expectation that they will stay off of it. Moving guys on and off the list is too complicated, especially mid-season.

Besides, I think the team is probably more keen on De Vries at this point than Blackburn anyway (as they should be).

Baker is a no-doubter in my mind. The dude is a quality pitcher (albiet not super durable) on a staff that is full of question marks to say the least.

What can the Twins get for $20 million in 2013, and add another $30 million to the mix in 2014...all earmarked for starters. That is the question. One $10 and two $5, and how much for a second, not to bring up options for a third.

I support bringing back Baker. No sure thing there, but he should be ready early enough next year, and let's not forget that this guy was essentially our "ace" before everything fell apart. Not Liriano (too erratic), not Pavano (had one good year), but Baker. So if he could've made $9.25 million without the TJ surgery, I don't think he's taking $1 million or $2 million next year. He can get a better 1-year deal somewhere for sure, but even in the $3 to $6 million range he's a better value than paying a healthy guy in the FA market.

Originally Posted by StormJH1

I support bringing back Baker. No sure thing there, but he should be ready early enough next year, and let's not forget that this guy was essentially our "ace" before everything fell apart. Not Liriano (too erratic), not Pavano (had one good year), but Baker. So if he could've made $9.25 million without the TJ surgery, I don't think he's taking $1 million or $2 million next year. He can get a better 1-year deal somewhere for sure, but even in the $3 to $6 million range he's a better value than paying a healthy guy in the FA market.

Colby Lewis got a 1 year deal for $2 million with up to an additional $4 million in incentives. That's about the same range I expect for Baker. I just hope they add a second year option.

Originally Posted by JP3700

Originally Posted by StormJH1

I support bringing back Baker. No sure thing there, but he should be ready early enough next year, and let's not forget that this guy was essentially our "ace" before everything fell apart. Not Liriano (too erratic), not Pavano (had one good year), but Baker. So if he could've made $9.25 million without the TJ surgery, I don't think he's taking $1 million or $2 million next year. He can get a better 1-year deal somewhere for sure, but even in the $3 to $6 million range he's a better value than paying a healthy guy in the FA market.

Colby Lewis got a 1 year deal for $2 million with up to an additional $4 million in incentives. That's about the same range I expect for Baker. I just hope they add a second year option.

Baker and the Twins are a good fit--and both know it. Baker will have a savvy agent and will have "sniffed around" to gauge Baker's market value. The Twins will assuredly have a codicile in the contract to allow them to extend it beyond 2013--the need for pitching goes beyond 2013 and they won't want to lose Baker without compensation should he have a strong season.

Originally Posted by JP3700

Originally Posted by StormJH1

I support bringing back Baker. No sure thing there, but he should be ready early enough next year, and let's not forget that this guy was essentially our "ace" before everything fell apart. Not Liriano (too erratic), not Pavano (had one good year), but Baker. So if he could've made $9.25 million without the TJ surgery, I don't think he's taking $1 million or $2 million next year. He can get a better 1-year deal somewhere for sure, but even in the $3 to $6 million range he's a better value than paying a healthy guy in the FA market.

Colby Lewis got a 1 year deal for $2 million with up to an additional $4 million in incentives. That's about the same range I expect for Baker. I just hope they add a second year option.

The Rangers take on the risk that Lewis will not pitch until after the all star break and possibly much later. Even then, it may take some time to get back to speed and he may be on reduced pitch counts. Baker is much further along on the recovery path.

Originally Posted by Teddy

I doubt we'll see Gibson until mid-June, to avoid Super-2 status on him.

Just to pick a nit here, but if Gibson made the rotation out of spring training, he would not be super 2 elligible after his second season, as he would have exactly 2 years of service time. Super 2 tends to affect people who get called up for a good chunk of a partial season (i.e. calling him up in say June and he stays on the roster)... you have to have aproximately 2 1/3 years of service to be a super 2.

Bye-Bye Baker. http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/85...-contract-2013