09-20-2012, 05:20 PM #1
Terry Ryan's "Thin" SP Market Quote
Given that Terry Ryan's vague quote in a Jim Souhan column about a "thin" SP market has generated a lot of confusion here and elsewhere, I felt the best idea would be to simply email Souhan for clarification. His response:
"He was referring to top-of-the-rotation starters. And my interpretation was that he was talking about top-of-the-rotation starters he would be interested in."
So there ya go. I don't think anyone should be surprised by that.
09-20-2012, 05:34 PM #2
09-20-2012, 05:59 PM #3
I don't see how anyone could think the top end starting pitching market isn't thin... It starts and ends with Grienke. There are some nice pitchers on the market that could improve this rotation... but Grienke is the only one i see as a #1.
09-20-2012, 06:27 PM #4
09-20-2012, 07:58 PM #5
It is thin when put in the perspective Souhan provided, and it's also likely a bargaining maneuver. Every purchasing-GMs has an interest to downplay the strength of the market. I think this is about what you'd hear from most decent negotiators at this point in the process.
09-20-2012, 08:40 PM #6
09-20-2012, 10:09 PM #7
Dempster showed a lot of regression after the trade... I'd categorize him as a #2.
These two are about to get 2 big contracts... that being said I want nothing to do with them on the Twins. Dempster is getting old and will command a multi-year deal and will be looking to maximize what will likely be his final deal.
Peavy is looking at a final deal as well... He's likely going to be looking (and getting) way more years than he's worth.
I really wouldn't invest the cash in any of the top free agent pitchers (Grienke/Dempster/Peavy)... They all have a lot of mileage on their arms (even Grienke who's the youngest of the group at 28). If they sign one (longshot anyway) and they pull a Zito... the Twins would be absolutely ****ed with payroll.
09-20-2012, 11:51 PM #8
Alot of bull.
09-21-2012, 06:43 AM #9
I don't know if I would classify anyone in this FA crop of pitchers as an "ace". Lots of really good #2s, mediocre #2s, and borderline #3s but no aces, really. Every pitcher in the class has a significant flaw. Greinke's mental state (and three years of off-and-on mediocrity), Dempster's struggles in the AL, Peavy's injury history, etc.
09-21-2012, 07:58 AM #10
09-21-2012, 08:20 AM #11
09-21-2012, 08:24 AM #12
09-21-2012, 08:33 AM #13
The team that signs Grienke will have overpaid.
He's alright, but he isn't even worth the money he is being paid now.
09-21-2012, 08:42 AM #14
But I agree that there's a good chance whoever signs him deeply regrets it by 2016 (he should get at least four years, probably five this offseason). With top-shelf (or perceived top-shelf) pitchers, you overpay just to sign the guy. You sign him for an extra year or two as the player inevitably declines. Once you factor in that overpaying and extended length, you're easily looking at a guy who will be 50% more expensive over the short term and crippling over the longterm. I have zero issues with the Twins avoiding "elite" free agent pitching. It's just not a smart move for mid-market teams.
On the other hand, I will be terribly disappointed if they don't sign a Jackson/Marcum/Sanchez type for three years. Those are the type of contracts that won't kill a mid-market team even if they fail. Sure, the upside is lower but if you're going to compete, you have to do it from the farm. Free agency has to be a complementary piece of the puzzle, not the main piece.
My blueprint would be to trade Span for a high upside guy in the minors (probably low minors) to build for the long term. Then I'd sign a Jackson/Marcum type for three years. Then I'd sign Baker and cross my fingers. This rotation could compete in the Central if things break well for the Twins and it also gives them hope down the road:
Scrub/Gibson later in the season
Other scrub (Hendriks, probably)
Sixth man: Deduno, De Vries, etc.
Span for a low minors starter
Wimmers (hope hope)
09-21-2012, 09:04 AM #15
Pretty simple, if you want to win you pay or sit in last place and be a cheapskate.
09-21-2012, 09:26 AM #16
09-21-2012, 09:43 AM #17
09-21-2012, 10:11 AM #18
Signing Jackson or Marcum, AND signing a Joe Blanton or Ervin Santana? Probably not. Joe Saunders? Maybe for a Marquisesque contract.
Anyway, another option for your trade scenario, of course, is for a major league pitcher. I have mentioned a few times that arbitration-eligible pitchers (and there are about a dozen of them worth considering) might be an option in a trade. But basically no one has ever replied to me about that so maybe I am crazy to think that teams trade younger pitchers like that? The list I made before, with FA year:
Chris Sale, CHW 2017
Jarrod Parker, OAK, 2018 (?)
Matt Harrison, TEX, 2015
Tommy Milone, OAK, 2018
Jason Hammel, BAL, 2014
Jeremy Hellickson, TB, 2017
Jordan Zimmermann, WAS, 2016
James McDonald, PIT, 2016
Wade Miley, WAS, 2018
Lance Lynn, STL, 2018
Vance Worley, PHI, 2018
Clayton Richard, SDG, 2015
The attractiveness here is that they all were good this year, and would be under control for awhile. Would a Span/Morneau, crazy bigfoot freak Swarzak (seriously?), and BJ Hermsen (I have big doubts about him, probably other teams do too, but whatever) be enough for one of these guys?
09-21-2012, 10:22 AM #19
Assuming the payroll stays 90 to 110 million where will they spend that money if not on top pitchers?
09-21-2012, 10:40 AM #20
I agree with Ryan that it's fairly thin at the top, and as people have mentioned each of the top types have question marks...
That said, anyone that generally everyone considers a #2 is better than anything they have. And, frankly, good #3s are better than anything that the Twins have. So, for the Twins sake, there are quite a few options, but I'm against overpaying for any of them. That said, a few should fall through the cracks into a "makes sense" contract area.
Last edited by Seth Stohs; 09-21-2012 at 10:41 AM. Reason: added last sentence