09-20-2012, 01:12 PM #21
I think this is a market the Twins are best kind of sitting back and watching for a bit. Once Greinke signs, the next tier will go. Jackson and Sanchez should get decent deals, like over $20M. I'm not sure I see anyone else who would get more than $6M a year... I mean, i think if the Twins were aggressive, like they were with Carroll and Doumit last year, and offered Blanton 2 years and $12M, I think he'd probably sign. Guthrie was released 2 months ago.I'm intrigued by Ervin Santana, and I might go 3 years, $18M with him.
There you go... there's my strategy... be aggressive and see if you an have Anibal Sanchez (4 years, $28M), Ervin Santana (3 years, $18M), and Joe Blanton at 1 year, $5M. There's $18M and three pitchers who are likely the top three in the Twins rotation, followed by Diamond and then Deduno for the short-term. If they're not willing to sign those deals quickly, stay in good standing with their agents and offer them the same deal, or 95% of the same deal, in early January.
09-20-2012, 01:23 PM #22
I think your estimates are way too low, Seth. I think Jackson will get at least 3/$30m. Sanchez will probably get close to the same if he pitches well in his remaining starts (he looked pretty bad with Miami in his final months and struggled with Detroit right off the bat).
09-20-2012, 01:34 PM #23
This is a deep FA pitching class??? Grienke yes--if he could keep his head together. Sanchez maybe but not having a good time now with Detroit. The rest--you gotta be kidding.
I wouldnt give any of them more than 6mill a year; or 15 mill for 3. They are not youngsters--staying healthy for 3 years is a question for all of them. I have stated on other threads that Jackson (#4 starter here for Nats--yes deep rotation) is overrated. I dont think he is better than Diamond. He may be the best after Greinke.
Twins much better off trading Span/Revere/Morneau (packaged with somebody else) for a good number 2 starter or better yet a high prospect ready to pitch in 2014.
09-20-2012, 01:41 PM #24
09-20-2012, 02:08 PM #25
Few good pitchers will ever be free agents. Great pitchers, yes, because they are expensive. But good pitchers? Not super likely. If they want good pitchers, they will need to trade.
09-20-2012, 02:31 PM #26
Rather make a deal for someone like Brandon Morrow than mess around with whom Terry Ryan will chase....jeff francis types
09-20-2012, 02:46 PM #27
Another view might be that since 2013 is going to be a rebuilding year anyway, it might be better to focus on trading for prospects who are projected to be ready in 2014 and 2015 rather than paying big bucks for someone who is ready before they are needed.
09-20-2012, 03:08 PM #28
09-20-2012, 03:11 PM #29
Surprised no one has even mentioned Jake Peavy. The white sox have already said they aren't going to pick up his option. I don't think the twins should go after him but his being on the market might make a couple of the mid level guys like Jackson, Marcum or Sanchez more affordable/available.
09-20-2012, 07:24 PM #30
Ervin Santana is looking all kinds of awful and there is no reason to be intrigued. Blanton has a long history of sucking in the NL.
09-20-2012, 09:37 PM #31
09-20-2012, 09:46 PM #32
- I don't think that the Twins will ever give a 4 year deal to a FA pitcher.
- I don't think that any of these guys who are free agents are better than a fixed Baker
- I don't think that any of these guys who are free agents are much better than a good Liriano
The Twins got to go to the root cause of this and look at a different pitching coach for starters.
09-20-2012, 10:35 PM #33
I agree on Blanton, though I might go 6.
I don't know about Santana - he's been awful this year but very good the last two. He had a miserable April, and then had his workload cut down in July (tired arm?) and seems to be fixed and effective now. Since July 30, he's had a 3.30 ERA with 46/15 in 57 innings. I don't know if his overall numbers will garner a mutli-year deal or not, but if it does, I think it'll be closer to 3/24 (or even 3/27) than 3/18. (BTW, I like that name, too. But I can't imagine the Twins paying the freight unless the market really drops out.)
09-20-2012, 10:44 PM #34
1. How many $20+ M contracts are signed - these are rare and clearly a sign that a team is investing in a significant pitcher. Over the last 6 years, here is how many have signed those deals: 3, 2, 2, 3, 1, 9.
2. How many $10+M contracts are signed - these are either solid guys or very good guys that are getting a one-year deal. Over the last 6 years, here is how many have signed those deals (beyond the $20+ M) : 4, 3, 4, 2, 1, 6.
3. How many get at least a major league deal. I don't have the exact numbers for these handy, but most years it has been 12-18.
By those 3 measurements, this year's free agent market is going to be better than any of the last five classes in all three categories. I think if you go through the class, that becomes apparent.
So when you say you think the market is "thin" I would be interested in your definition. I'll admit - I struggled to find mine. It might not be right.
09-20-2012, 11:09 PM #35
God... I'm hoping that I'm being reasonable with my wish list but I'm prepared for the possibility of not being within reason.
I'd like to see the Twins target one FA and make a real strong push. Overpay if they have to... But pick one and roll the dice.
My choice... if the Rays dont pick up his option. Shields would be the guy in my opinion.
I'd also like the Twins to trade for one young SP with upside ready to be a rookie next year. I don't care who they give up to get this young SP. if it takes Span and someone else... OK... Lets do it.
My choice... Target the Braves and see what it takes to get Terehan.
I'd also like to see the Twins roll the dice on a young rule 5. Put him in the rotation and ride it out.
My choice... No idea... Open to suggestions. Lets see if our scouts can pull out a gem.
Diamond... can make it 4... Baker if he's willing to sign for a smaller contract with larger bonuses could be 5...
Deduno... 5 or 6 depending on Baker... Devries... choice 6 or 7... Hendriks... 7 or 8... Gibson in June or July can be 8 or 9.
Plus take a chance on a Minor League FA or two which I'm sure they will do.
All in All... Not overwhelming but better in my opinion.
Last edited by Riverbrian; 09-20-2012 at 11:11 PM.
09-20-2012, 11:12 PM #36
09-21-2012, 01:18 PM #37
09-21-2012, 02:26 PM #38
Yes--pick up a mediocre starter (Sheilds?? Peavy??) and maybe overpay him...trade Morneau/Span/Revere for another (younger) starter...go with IF next year of Parmalee, Dozier at 2B, Florimon, Plouffe with Carroll as UT...hope for Gibson/Baker to join Diamond and these 2 pitchers in rotation--with Deduno, Walters, DeVries battling it out in ST for 4 and 5 roles. Trade more at deadline (based on progress of Hicks, Arcia and Sano for 2014).
09-21-2012, 04:01 PM #39
What about Peavy? Sox arent picking up his option....any chance we go after him?
09-21-2012, 05:44 PM #40
My definition of a non-thin market is one that has several number 1 pitchers in a championship team as free agents. This market has a guy who is maybe a number 2 (Greinke) and the rest are lower. Again, I am talking about a championship team, not the Royals of this world. Hamels' extension hurt the market. I just do not see any number ones out there in this market.
Now, as far as $ goes, teams spend. They will spend and they will overspend. If Greinke gets a number 1 type of contract this does not mean that he is an ace...