I propose a motion to ban using the cliche "pitch to contact"

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

07-31-2012, 01:05 PM
nokomismod

I propose a motion to ban using the cliche "pitch to contact"

Is anyone else tired of this term (Pitch to Contact) being used to describe bad pitching or used to negatively describe pitchers with a low k rate? Good pitching does not necessarily mean a high strike out ratio or the ability to blaze a fastball like Kenny Powers. I think we all agree the Twins are lacking in good starting pitching right now and I don't think there is a Pitch to Contact conspiracy to blame for it. Just a bunch of starters (Baker, Blackburn, Slowey, Perkins, Liriano) who didn't end up being as good as Twins Mgmt and many fans (me included) thought they would be.
Sorry about the rant.
07-31-2012, 01:07 PM
Nick Nelson

The Twins have an abundance of pitchers who allow a great deal of contact. They also have a lack of high-caliber pitching in their organization. Sorry, but the two facts are not unrelated. I think complaints about coaches preaching the PTC philosophy are over the top, but their tendency to target pitchers with low K-rates is tiresome.
07-31-2012, 01:11 PM
James

Can we replace it with "Pitch to Collision"?
07-31-2012, 01:16 PM
Brock Beauchamp

Quote:

Originally Posted by James

Can we replace it with "Pitch to Collision"?

Or, in the case of Blackburn, "Pitch to Outfielders" or "Pitch to Seats".
07-31-2012, 02:29 PM
nokomismod

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocketpig

Or, in the case of Blackburn, "Pitch to Outfielders" or "Pitch to Seats".

Touche'!
07-31-2012, 02:30 PM
nokomismod

Quote:

Originally Posted by James

Can we replace it with "Pitch to Collision"?

I like this better. Or Pitch to explosion.
07-31-2012, 02:31 PM
Shores, Esq

So a word filter is in order then?
07-31-2012, 02:32 PM
DPJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shores, Esq

So a word filter is in order then?

I wish, TD is too cool for word filters.
07-31-2012, 02:42 PM
buckshot4227

Power pitchers with high strike out rates get paid more. That is why the Twins dont have any power arms in their rotation. Same goes for power bats. Usually a guy who hits 30 bombs, but only hits for a .260 avg still gets paid more than a guy who hits .300 plus but only hits 6 hrs unless your name is Joe Mauer. IMO that is why the Twins draft these fast, weak hitting, avg hitters, because you should be able to retain them on the cheap.
07-31-2012, 02:45 PM
DPJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckshot4227

Power pitchers with high strike out rates get paid more. That is why the Twins dont have any power arms in their rotation. Same goes for power bats. Usually a guy who hits 30 bombs, but only hits for a .260 avg still gets paid more than a guy who hits .300 plus but only hits 6 hrs unless your name is Joe Mauer. IMO that is why the Twins draft these fast, weak hitting, avg hitters, because you should be able to retain them on the cheap.

In the grand scheme of drafting and developing players, I can't imagine any team is really thinking about what's gonna happen 6 years after he debuts in the majors if they can retain him.
07-31-2012, 02:46 PM
Highabove

Leather to Wood

Pre 1980 Horsehide to Wood

College Leather to Aluminum
07-31-2012, 02:47 PM
nokomismod

Just saying that continuously complaining about our "pitch to contact" philosphy and demanding the Anderson and Gardenhire be fired because of it gets old. Just like complaining about Mauer's contract.
I don't think Anderson or the other Twins pitching coaches want their pitchers to leave the ball waist high over the middle.
07-31-2012, 02:51 PM
DPJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by nokomismod

I don't think Anderson or the other Twins pitching coaches want their pitchers to leave the ball waist high over the middle.

Now there is something to be said about that comment. If Gardy and Rick didn't want these crap tossing control arms then I assume they would go to the Twins Front office and demand power arms. If worrying less about walks and more about strikeouts was something they wanted they would say something. But for the better part of the last 20 years, these have been the arms that the Twins have targeted and identified in the draft. So I have a hard time believing that these crappy control pitchers aren't exactly what Rick and Gardy want.
07-31-2012, 02:52 PM
nokomismod

Quote:

Originally Posted by DPJ

In the grand scheme of drafting and developing players, I can't imagine any team is really thinking about what's gonna happen 6 years after he debuts in the majors if they can retain him.

Agreed. I could see maybe drafting based on health. College or high school pitchers with a high K rate might be throwing more sliders and high heat and tend to break down sooner than a location pitcher with a good mix.
07-31-2012, 02:56 PM
mikeee

I prefer pitcher of beer. :D
07-31-2012, 03:16 PM
buckshot4227

Quote:

Originally Posted by DPJ

In the grand scheme of drafting and developing players, I can't imagine any team is really thinking about what's gonna happen 6 years after he debuts in the majors if they can retain him.

Could you explain your theory on why the Twins never have any power arms, and how it seems that all the pitchers that come through the organization all seem to be cut from the same cloth?
07-31-2012, 03:19 PM
buckshot4227

Quote:

Originally Posted by DPJ

In the grand scheme of drafting and developing players, I can't imagine any team is really thinking about what's gonna happen 6 years after he debuts in the majors if they can retain him.

Also you could explain the lack of power bats that come through the organization if you have time.
07-31-2012, 03:59 PM
sbknudson

Quote:

Originally Posted by nokomismod

Is anyone else tired of this term (Pitch to Contact) being used to describe bad pitching or negatively describe pitchers with a low k rate? Good pitching does necesarrily mean a high strike out ratio or the ability to blaze a fastball like Kenny Powers. I think we all agree the Twins are lacking in good starting pitching right now and I don't think there is a Pitch to Contact conspiracy to blame for it. Just a bunch of starters (Baker, Blackburn, Slowey, Perkins, Liriano) who didn't end up being as good as Twins Mgmt and many fans (me included) thought they would be.
Sorry about the rant.

I can share your sentiment. There is a difference between "pitching to contact" and just plain bad pitching. Unfortunately, the Twins are all too often guilty of the later. Good "pitch to contact" pitchers may not have high K rates, but they also don't have high opp. batting averages. They locate their pitches well and pitch intelligently so that when contact is made it is much more likely to be an out than a base hit. That means not throwing cookies belt high over the center of the plate. Personally I prefer that type of pitcher - they are the ones that are going to have career longevity, whereas the power pitcher who can't do this will start getting hit hard once they get older and a few mph comes off the fastball (Nolan Ryan being the notable exception, of course).
07-31-2012, 04:14 PM
gil4

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeee

I prefer pitcher of beer. :D

Our pitching and large quantities of beer do seem to go together, but it would be nice to get to the point where one to celebrate is enough.
07-31-2012, 04:25 PM
nokomismod

Yes, thank you sbknudson. That's what I was trying to say, but you said it better.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page