Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 74

Thread: Article: The Twins 2013 Payroll Crunch

  1. #1
    Administrator All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar

    Posts
    1,605

    Article: The Twins 2013 Payroll Crunch


  2. #2
    Senior Member Triple-A Highabove's Avatar

    Posts
    465
    I believe the current payroll rest at 97 million. Marquis 3 million dollars was added a few weeks into the season.
    Last edited by Highabove; 07-09-2012 at 07:24 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    231
    Vikings & Wolves should be thanking their lucky stars they got money this year. Because Twins should be the poster boys for the "no public money funding a stadium" crowd. Target Field is becoming proof positive that a new stadium does not mean the FO will spend to fix their past decisions / mistakes.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Triple-A Twins Fan From Afar's Avatar

    Posts
    402
    Good post, John. If the second half of 2012 continues like the first half, and attendance continues to dwindle, I think we'll see a lower 2013 payroll.

    But I disagree with the term "fantasies" to describe retaining Liriano. Sure, it's a fantasy when he's great, or even effective, but I'd argue that the prospect of paying him $12.5 million for that other 50 percent of the time when he's one of the worst pitchers in baseball is tough to swallow. He's an interesting case either way.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    206
    I actually expect that the budget will go up, at least slightly. Some of the extra money allotted to the draft this year will likely go back to the payroll. Besides, just because the money is available, doesn't mean you should spend it.

    Last year, the free agent crop wasn't exceptionally strong. It appears it could be stronger and deeper this year. A 2nd consideration is that many of these free agents can't be signed to one year contracts. If you are going to lose some of your current players because of a long term free agent signing, you better be pretty sure your farm system can cover that.

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star sbknudson's Avatar

    Posts
    1,475
    One minor correction: the numbers in USA Today only included those on major league rosters, so that $94M didn't include Nishioka. If that's added in, the payroll for this year is $97M. That means they can spend an additional $21M to what is listed in your article and keep payroll same as last year.

  7. #7
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,258
    Isn't Nishi on the hook for next year also?

    And, I agree with John. The payroll will drop, and the starting pitching will be bad again, and attendance will drop, and a vicious cycle of self-fulfilling prophecy will occur.

  8. #8
    Senior Member All-Star ashburyjohn's Avatar

    Posts
    2,246
    > ask youself: where this team would be with another $18.5M worth of starting pitching?

    Why would we want 6 more Jason Marquises?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Triple-A minn55441's Avatar

    Posts
    448
    They will have to sign one if not Two FA starting pitchers. Hopefully they won't be of the Jason Marquis caliber. Terry Ryan wants to win, he knows he needs pitching to win. The Pohlands know that without a winner, revenues will continue to drop. I don't think that we will see a drop in payroll. It may not top 100 million, but it will be above 85 million.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    551
    Cot's has them at $100,435,000. I don't think that includes Zumaya. The USA Today data may not have included Nishioka and Marquis who were in minors.

    If correct, the difference might be closer to 11.5 million which may have signed Edwin Jackson. It is questionable whether he would have come to Minnesota for the same pay as he received from the Nationals so it may not be a good comp.

    Edwin Jackson helps but it does not turn the Twins into a winning team.

    As for next year, I really hope that they do 1 or 2 larger contracts for a more elite player instead of the 3-6 million value contracts. For every Doumit who returns good value, we get three guys like Nishioka, Marquis and Carroll. I would prefer the Twins get one pitcher for the money those 4 get and fill in the other three spots with team control players or minor league deal guys. The same goes with the contracts for Span and Blackburn. They both signed what was portrayed to be team friendly seals to avoid arbitration. Are we really better off? Sure Span would be getting a good return next year but we are stuck with Blackburn's bad deal.

    You always overpay for top players and risk their injury. Let's just stop paying 3-6 million for the mediocre or injury risk players. Let's risk it on an elite player instead.

    Of course, the Twins have already started on the other path. Instead of putting every resource towards pitching first, they signed Doumit to another friendly contract. I understand that I am in the minority and maybe the sole voice on Doumit's contract. Is it really reasonable to project two more healthy seasons from Doumit? What does that leave them for pitching? I don't know, but I want the pitcher who is worth 3.5 million more than the one we get.

  11. #11
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    83
    Carroll? I think he is a good pickup and that Terry Ryan actually had a really good year in free agency. There wasn't a ton of free agent pitchers that would have done anything for us last winter. This year is a much better year for that, Ryan knew that. Look for them to make strong run at Greinke who will go to a smaller market team. I also think they will gamble on Gibson being ready to help when healthy. You also haven't accounted for them picking up a pitcher through a trade.

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star sbknudson's Avatar

    Posts
    1,475
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    Isn't Nishi on the hook for next year also?
    Yes, but that was already in John's table.

  13. #13
    Senior Member All-Star sbknudson's Avatar

    Posts
    1,475
    So, if we have $21M available to maintain payroll at it's current level, does that have any implications for picking up options? Baker has a 9.25M option, and while he will be recovering from TJ surgery, I think a Baker at 90% is still better than a AAAA pitcher.

  14. #14
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,258
    I don't think Baker is at 90% for most of next year. I just can't see them rolling that die.
    Win Twins.

  15. #15
    Administrator All-Star Seth Stohs's Avatar

    Posts
    4,046
    What if they're able to acquire a C-prospect for Morneau and only have to pick up, say, $4 million of his 2013 contract? There is $9.5 million more available.

    I would like to keep Jamey Carroll around because he's been solid and a good influence and all that, but there's some money there.

    What if they're able to trade Span for three decent prospects. There's $4 million 2013 and more for the following year.

    I'm one who agrees that payroll is a little overrated. Just have to make good decisions and then get players to perform.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer YourHouseIsMyHouse's Avatar

    Posts
    879
    Hopefully Span and Morneau are traded. That clears 18.75 unless the Twins chip in. There are good prospects to be had!! They could then stick Parmelee at 1B because he is more than ready. He just needs playing time. Mastroianni wouldn't be an awful fill-in in my opinion for Span. Call up Clete because he doesn't deserve AAA ABs.That would help change the organizational arrangement of the minors. It's a big problem for outfielders.
    Last edited by YourHouseIsMyHouse; 07-09-2012 at 09:44 PM.

  17. #17
    Administrator All-Star Seth Stohs's Avatar

    Posts
    4,046
    I'd absolutely bring back Scott Baker on a low-base, high-incentive contract that would include a second year option.

  18. #18
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,101
    Trade them all because Joe Public is tired of getting screwed buy the rich.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Double-A striker_86's Avatar

    Posts
    173
    Bring back Baker (not for 9.5 though). Hope Gibson is ready, and sign a legitimate starter with the rest of the $$.

    Our rotation would be

    1. New Ace
    2. Diamond
    3. Baker
    4. Gibson
    5. Blackburn or whoever works out in spring training

  20. #20
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Rosterman's Avatar

    Posts
    594
    Isn't Capps all but signed for 2013 with a decent option pick up?

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2013 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

SEO by vBSEO