Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Photo

Article: Position Battle: The Bullpen

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 4,903 posts

Posted 24 February 2014 - 08:11 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...les-The-Bullpen

#2 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,223 posts

Posted 24 February 2014 - 08:28 PM

Hard to tell about the pen this season. Perkins, Burton, Swarzak and Duensing are the only 4 locks in my book. Plus there are some outsiders like Oliveras and Guerra who are finally healthy and knocking on the door as well.

Interesting to see what happens
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#3 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,261 posts

Posted 24 February 2014 - 09:00 PM

One must consider that this is a rebuilding team and retaining players who failed before, and failed during this preseason doesn't make any sense. This skill-level type player is always available--so losing one (or more) is no loss. Every manager has to make cuts--and some will have to go! The article defined several successful bullpen pitchers, it would be foolish to demote one of them to retain a failed starter.

#4 jimv2

jimv2

    Member

  • Members
  • 44 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 12:58 AM

Congratualtions on 20 years, John, and best wishes for seeing 30 and more.

#5 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 7,276 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 01:05 AM

I think that Perkins, Burton, Fien, Swarzak and Duensing are givens. I think that Thielbar and Pressly should be givens but due to options probably aren't.

When rebuilding, there's no need to give up anyone that you don't have to without getting something in return.

#6 Major Leauge Ready

Major Leauge Ready

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 429 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 06:44 AM

One must consider that this is a rebuilding team and retaining players who failed before, and failed during this preseason doesn't make any sense. This skill-level type player is always available--so losing one (or more) is no loss. Every manager has to make cuts--and some will have to go! The article defined several successful bullpen pitchers, it would be foolish to demote one of them to retain a failed starter.


Maybe my perception is off but was'nt Perkins a failed starter?

#7 CRArko

CRArko

    Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 1,253 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 07:35 AM

Maybe my perception is off but was'nt Perkins a failed starter?


Swarzak and Duensing as well. I expect one of the three option-less starters to find a spot in the pen. I'd be sad if they really do go to a 13 man staff in April to stash two of them there.

#8 wabene

wabene

    Member

  • Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 08:07 AM

Maybe my perception is off but was'nt Perkins a failed starter?

"Swarzak and Duensing as well. I expect one of the three option-less starters to find a spot in the pen. I'd be sad if they really do go to a 13 man staff in April to stash two of them there."
A guy like Diamond with fringe stuff is not the same as someone like Perk, a #1 pick with velocity. We been there done that with guys like Diamond. Would somebody really find room for him on the 25? Look what happened with Hendrix another AAAA guy. If Diamond is gone, Deduno on DL and Worley At 5 for another shot; best result IMO. But, didn't Correa already get tweaked. The other side of this is depth is good if unfamiliar.

#9 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,261 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 12:35 PM

Swarzak and Duensing as well. I expect one of the three option-less starters to find a spot in the pen. I'd be sad if they really do go to a 13 man staff in April to stash two of them there.


Most pitchers are failed starters. But, Perkins wasn't a total bust--and as was pointed-out he had a very good fastball and slider. The "failures" I'm referencing don't have anything resembling "+ stuff".

In a similar vein, in 2008, the Twins were convinced that they should "obtain value" for Livan Hernandez. So they hung on to him (starting him) which kept a rather successful Liriano in Rochester. Livan ran out of magic dust and the Twins frittered-away some games before DFAing him and promoting Liriano. Liriano was "more than effective" on his return. Oh, the season ended in a game 163 loss--one more "win" in the regulation 162 and the Twins win their division and go to face the Rays in post-season. Sometimes a team just has to "cut bait". This Spring will be another of those times.

#10 OldManWinter

OldManWinter

    Member

  • Members
  • 80 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 03:04 PM

John, congratulations on twenty. I also "saved" my wife from the streets of Philly, soon to be 46 years.

#11 gocgo

gocgo

    Member

  • Members
  • 69 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 04:14 PM

Most pitchers are failed starters. But, Perkins wasn't a total bust--and as was pointed-out he had a very good fastball and slider. The "failures" I'm referencing don't have anything resembling "+ stuff".

In a similar vein, in 2008, the Twins were convinced that they should "obtain value" for Livan Hernandez. So they hung on to him (starting him) which kept a rather successful Liriano in Rochester. Livan ran out of magic dust and the Twins frittered-away some games before DFAing him and promoting Liriano. Liriano was "more than effective" on his return. Oh, the season ended in a game 163 loss--one more "win" in the regulation 162 and the Twins win their division and go to face the Rays in post-season. Sometimes a team just has to "cut bait". This Spring will be another of those times.


I agree. It seems like we get handcuffed because we are afraid to lose out on someone that might have success on another team. So, we put other guys on hold who may also have potential. Sometimes, you just have to make a decision and go with it. In this case, take the guys who deserve to be there. Doing anything else sends the wrong message to the rest of the guys in the minors.

#12 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,223 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:01 PM

When rebuilding, there's no need to give up anyone that you don't have to without getting something in return.


Agreed, but how would you characterize what happened to Slowey, Thome, Liriano, Young, Burnett, Hendriks et. al. and a bunch of minor leaguers including Angel Morales in the past few seasons?
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#13 The Wise One

The Wise One

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 645 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:24 PM

Agreed, but how would you characterize what happened to Slowey, Thome, Liriano, Young, Burnett, Hendriks et. al. and a bunch of minor leaguers including Angel Morales in the past few seasons?


Slowey, Liriano and Young returned prospects.
Any of the recently released prospects catch fire and make it to the majors? If the answer is no then you have you answer staring at you why they were released. 20-60 prospects every year becomes mostly released players.

#14 troyhobbs

troyhobbs

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 170 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 06:00 PM

I like the idea of keeping the guys without options and spot starting several guys in the 5th rotation slot as well as seeing how those same guys come out of the pen. Come trade deadline take anything you can get for anyone not named Perkins or Nolasco and bring up the young guys

#15 BD57

BD57

    Member

  • Members
  • 70 posts

Posted 25 February 2014 - 08:55 PM

John, anticipatory congrats on 20 years with TVOR - glad to hear you don't want or need another option.

#16 chuchadoro

chuchadoro

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 108 posts

Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:56 AM

I have an Arby's coupon that is about to expire but I already went shopping and have plenty of decent food in my kitchen. Should I use the coupon while I still can, possibly at the expense of the food I already bought? Probably not since I got Arby's last year, ate half my sandwich, decided it was not fit for human consumption, and cooked a different meal.

#17 troyhobbs

troyhobbs

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 170 posts

Posted 26 February 2014 - 05:48 PM

I have an Arby's coupon that is about to expire but I already went shopping and have plenty of decent food in my kitchen. Should I use the coupon while I still can, possibly at the expense of the food I already bought? Probably not since I got Arby's last year, ate half my sandwich, decided it was not fit for human consumption, and cooked a different meal.


If you only eat half of your Arbys it's fine because you weren't really meant to enjoy this meal anyway, your groceries won't expire for a long time and may just go better with something not in your cupboards yet.

#18 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 503 posts

Posted 26 February 2014 - 06:57 PM

I have nothing against Worley or Diamond. (Excluding Deduno as healthy, he is pretty much the de-facto 5th starter, and generally agreed to have the best "stuff"). Each has climbed the milb latter with decent numbers and success, and shown in the majors what they are capable of. Unfortunately, their pure stuff is nothing outstanding, and each has also shown the ability to be down right aweful as well.

I don't like the idea of dumping a player out of options and getting nothing in return. Especially a younger player who, in theory, has potential. And yes, many quality relievers are in fact "failed" starters.

However, moving to the bullpen doesn't guarantee success of any kind. Further, a 5th starter with mixed results, even young, doesn't mean you have a diamond, no pun intended, just waiting to be polished, who will suddenly blossom in to something special or strong.

I have a hard time accepting keeping a failed starter at the expense of a strong young bullpen arm out of some sense of fear of potential loss. There are times, especially with a team with loads of young talent knocking on the door, and a team in the transition phase that the Twins are, where you have to make tough decisions and let some guys go.

#19 Sconnie

Sconnie

    King of his Castle

  • Members
  • 1,126 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 03 March 2014 - 01:00 PM

Thankfully the FO has a little time before opening day. Is a 6 man rotation out of the question?

After watching all of the starters struggle and the bullpen seemingly run out of gas, I'm not worried about the glut of mid to back end pitching.

Hopefully Worley and/or Diamond pitch well enough to become tradeable assets and Deduno comes back from injury healthy and effective.

Edited by Sconnie, 03 March 2014 - 01:03 PM.
Autocorrect