Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Recent Blogs

Photo

Predict Ponder

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,796 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 03 September 2013 - 03:04 PM

GS:

Passing
Att:
Comp:
Yds:
TD:
Int:

Rushing:
Rushes:
Yards:
TDs
Fumbles:

#2 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,796 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 03 September 2013 - 03:07 PM

GS: 14

Passing
Att: 550
Comp: 303
Yds: 3200
TD: 24
Int: 26

Rushing:
Rushes: 40
Yards: 225
TDs: 6
Fumbles: 8

#3 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 03 September 2013 - 07:00 PM

I predict: terrible and we no longer deal with him as QB.

#4 snepp

snepp

    Speediest Moderator

  • Twins Moderators
  • 4,117 posts

Posted 04 September 2013 - 12:05 PM

I predict: terrible and we no longer deal with him as QB.


I predict mediocrity, guised as "progress," leading to him being given a longer leash than he should be afforded.
"Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
- Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

#5 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 04 September 2013 - 08:27 PM

I predict mediocrity, guised as "progress," leading to him being given a longer leash than he should be afforded.


I predict you are more likely to be right....and it makes me want to kick puppies.

#6 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 04 September 2013 - 08:40 PM

GS: 14

Passing
Att: 550
Comp: 303
Yds: 3200
TD: 24
Int: 26

Rushing:
Rushes: 40
Yards: 225
TDs: 6
Fumbles: 8


If he's allowed to start 14 games with those awful numbers, I would ask why we signed Matt Cassel?

#7 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 04 September 2013 - 08:44 PM

I predict mediocrity, guised as "progress," leading to him being given a longer leash than he should be afforded.


I disagree.
This is the great thing about the NFL. There are no "scholarships" , as there sometimes are in MLB.
Ponder has no excuse this season. It's his 3rd season, and he has plenty of weapons. The best RB in football, a top 5 offensive line, a good veteran receiver who WILL get open (last year one of the prevailing excuses was that nobody was ever open, which is a pretty big indictment on the coaching staff, if true, considering that AD draws 8 and 9 in the box, meaning single coverage on every play), a top 10 TE, and couple of young weapons who both have a chance to be very good at their specific roles (Patterson as an explosive deep threat, and Wright as a poor man's Harvin).
Mediocrity will not be accepted this year. Ponder will need to take a significant step forward this year, or his career in Purple is over.

#8 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,796 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 04 September 2013 - 08:45 PM

If he's allowed to start 14 games with those awful numbers, I would ask why we signed Matt Cassel?


So they could move Joe Webb to wideout?

Don't ask me to explain the Vikings logic with QBs because I have no idea. I just get the impression they will sink or swim with Ponder. I predict they will sink hard.

#9 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 04 September 2013 - 08:52 PM

So they could move Joe Webb to wideout?

Don't ask me to explain the Vikings logic with QBs because I have no idea. I just get the impression they will sink or swim with Ponder. I predict they will sink hard.


If they only wanted a backup for emergency purpouses, and weren't going to actually play him unless Ponder gets hurt, they could have signed any number of much cheaper backup QB's.
I don't think you can judge the current regime based on how Chilly handled his QB situation.
I was critical of Spielman originally, but I think at this point he deserves some credit. He's assembled a pretty good roster here, with some pretty shrewd moves, and I give him way too much credit to think he's just going to throw it away because he will have blinders on regarding "his" QB.
The Vikings consider themselves a contender. If Ponder is as bad as your numbers, he will be replaced after the bye.

#10 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,614 posts

Posted 05 September 2013 - 06:27 AM

I think he only plays 5 games. He's a terrible QB and will finally get put on the bench. I'll be glad when the Ponder era is over.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#11 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts

Posted 05 September 2013 - 07:35 AM

Man, it's like reading about Plouffe.....

I predict he's the 17th best QB in the NFL, but that Peterson is not a deity, only awesome, and the team wins 7-8 games, and they all blame Ponder...
Lighten up Francis....

#12 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 05 September 2013 - 02:31 PM

Man, it's like reading about Plouffe.....

I predict he's the 17th best QB in the NFL, but that Peterson is not a deity, only awesome, and the team wins 7-8 games, and they all blame Ponder...


If he's only the 17th best QB in the NFL, he should get the blame. That is simply not good enough for a #12 overall pick in his 3rd year starting, and with the weapons we've surrounded him with.

#13 biggentleben

biggentleben

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 965 posts

Posted 05 September 2013 - 07:45 PM

If he's only the 17th best QB in the NFL, he should get the blame. That is simply not good enough for a #12 overall pick in his 3rd year starting, and with the weapons we've surrounded him with.


Weapons?! You're serious? I am a big fan of AD, but what else? Don't tell me about a rookie receiver or a TE who only exceeded a measly 40 yards 5 times the whole season. Greg Jennings I'm not convinced on as the Packers don't exactly let guys go with significant value left to give. You cannot judge Ponder whatsoever based on his "weapons".
Staff Writer for Tomahawktake.com, come check it out!

#14 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 05 September 2013 - 08:47 PM

Don't tell me about a rookie receiver or a TE who only exceeded a measly 40 yards 5 times the whole season. .


I think that's a reflection on Ponder, not Rudolph. Ponder has enough weapons, that's an excuse that has to stop. I can pretty much guarantee that if you put this group around an above average QB - they'd put up MUCH better numbers. It's just hard to post much more than 40 yards a game when your QB has difficulty posting more than that himself some times.

#15 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 06 September 2013 - 09:04 AM

Weapons?! You're serious? I am a big fan of AD, but what else? Don't tell me about a rookie receiver or a TE who only exceeded a measly 40 yards 5 times the whole season. Greg Jennings I'm not convinced on as the Packers don't exactly let guys go with significant value left to give. You cannot judge Ponder whatsoever based on his "weapons".


Any of the good QB's in the NFL would eat defenses alive with AD, a top 5 offensive line, a pro bowl TE, a proven possession receiver like Jennings, and talented (though admittedly unproven) weapons like Patterson, Simpson, and Wright.

Maybe it's unfair, maybe he was a reach at #12, but fair or not, there are expectations of a QB taken #12 overall. If you just want a game manager, take a guy in rd 2, or trade down to the bottom half of the 1st round. If you take a guy 12 overall, he should be a top 15 QB, AT LEAST, by his 3rd year starting.
And yes, he does have the weapons to do that. How would you compare our "weapons" to the weapons that SEA and SF had on offense last year? Kap and Russel Wilson both had breakout years with as much or less weapons on offense, both were drafted as recently or sooner than Ponder, and neither were drafted as high as Ponder.

#16 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Moderators
  • 4,448 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:57 AM

This is a make or break season for Ponder. I don't see any other way to look at it. He cannot have games like he did during the middle of last season. He doesn't need to put up Aaron Rodgers or Drew Brees numbers to win football games (assuming of course that Peterson is effective and healthy), but he has to at the least make teams pay for stacking 8-10 guys in the box. If he can do that, Peterson's goal of 2500 yards might not be unrealistic.

#17 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 10:48 AM

I guess I think football is a team sport, and you can't blame 1 player for wins and losses. Was Marino awful because hit teams didn't win a lot of playoff games, or maybe it was that the defense was terrible. I still remember people blaming Rodgers for the playoff loss against AZ, when the offense scored 42 points........but ya, my expectations for Ponder are pretty low.....and, since most of the QBs were taken in round 1, shouldn't all of them be good, by the logic above?
Lighten up Francis....

#18 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 11:34 AM

In the NFL, no position has more of an impact on team performance than the QB. Yes, it's a team game, but the QB makes his skill players better or worse depending upon his play. Ponder is terrible and eventually the excuse-making won't have any choice but to accept it.

Afterall mike, wasn't it you in another thread that said you're interested in results not excuses? :)

#19 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 06:00 PM

So yeah....he sucks.

#20 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,011 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 11:09 PM

Ponder is dog****, I hope he breaks his arm ASAP

#21 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,011 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 11:12 PM

Weapons?! You're serious? I am a big fan of AD, but what else? Don't tell me about a rookie receiver or a TE who only exceeded a measly 40 yards 5 times the whole season. Greg Jennings I'm not convinced on as the Packers don't exactly let guys go with significant value left to give. You cannot judge Ponder whatsoever based on his "weapons".

Yeah, that Percy harvin guy was certainly not a legit "weapon"

Ponder sucks, he can't make the throws, end of story.

#22 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 September 2013 - 11:46 PM

Late to the discussion, but put me in the camp that says in today's NFL, it's the QB who "makes" the weapons, not the other way around.

We all love watching AD, but you win in the NFL based on your ability to pass the ball, on your terms, and your ability to stop the other team from doing the same. Running the ball is a nice addition to an offense, not a basis.

Ponder is never going to be able to lead such an offense, IMO. Move on.

#23 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 07:26 AM

The offense scored 24....ponder was not good, but if your defense is going to be that bad (and they lose 3 DL after this year), it won't matter who the QB is this year or next....
Lighten up Francis....

#24 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 10:27 AM

The offense scored 24....ponder was not good, but if your defense is going to be that bad (and they lose 3 DL after this year), it won't matter who the QB is this year or next....


The defense has nothing to do with his comically awful interceptions and inaccurate throws. Hell, his best pass of the day should've been an easy touchdown that turned into an amazing bailout from Simpson.

Blaming the D for Ponder is new, I will give ya that.

#25 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 10:56 AM

My point was, they scored more than most other teams in the NFL yesterday, and all anyone can talk about is Ponder......if the point is to score points, the offense was actually effective yesterday. I'm blaming the D for the loss......that was the point of that post. If the defense is going to be bottom 5, not many QBs on the planet can overcome that.

As for "bailing him out", I watched a ton of football yesterday, nearly every game had a WR make a great catch, that's what happens in the NFL. That same WR also dropped a pass right in his hands to create an INT.
Lighten up Francis....

#26 biggentleben

biggentleben

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 965 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 12:32 PM

Yeah, that Percy harvin guy was certainly not a legit "weapon"

Ponder sucks, he can't make the throws, end of story.


Yeah, because I was talking about LAST season.
Staff Writer for Tomahawktake.com, come check it out!

#27 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 01:06 PM

btw, I am not a Ponder guy, I wanted Fairley or Amakamura in that draft....Fairley was the guy I most wanted. That would have helped the AWFUL defense yesterday.....
Lighten up Francis....

#28 Milkman

Milkman

    Member

  • Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 04:12 PM

The defense was not impressive from the get go and the Lion's themselves bailed out the D a couple time. But the Vikes offense is not doing the D any favors. Be it short fields from punts on their own 10yd line to turn overs at mid field or even worse. Not to mention the lopsided time of possession. That really wears on a D. Even when we do score it seems to be on big plays, not long sustained drives. That's the kind of thing that pays off at the end of the game. Keeping the Vikes D fresh and wearing down the opponent's D.

#29 Kobs

Kobs

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 301 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 04:43 PM

Talking Ponder after that game? Ponder is not Peyton Manning. Get over it. The defense and special teams were awful in that game, and they couldn't run the ball at all. You might as well blame a Twins loss on Pedro Florimon not hitting three home runs.

Something like 6 of the 8 times the Vikings ran the ball on first down, they got less than three yards. They can't win with that.

#30 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,901 posts

Posted 09 September 2013 - 06:24 PM

Talking Ponder after that game? Ponder is not Peyton Manning. Get over it. The defense and special teams were awful in that game, and they couldn't run the ball at all. You might as well blame a Twins loss on Pedro Florimon not hitting three home runs.

Something like 6 of the 8 times the Vikings ran the ball on first down, they got less than three yards. They can't win with that.


You don't think a passing game with the roar of a kitten had some impact there? Hell, I'd play ten man fronts and dare them.

the loss may have been more on the D, but Ponder was absolutely a huge part of it. He isn't a capable QB, that impacts your entire team as proven by teams like Indy, Wash, Seattle, and many other recent examples.