Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Photo

John Lannan?

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Trent Condon

Trent Condon

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 08:58 AM

The starting pitching depth on this team is quite scary. With the most recent news about Baker, the concerns grow by the day. What are peoples thoughts on John Lannan? He's been demoted to AAA because of the depth of the Nationals starting rotation.

-He's not going to be a superstar, or even above average but he provides much needed depth.
-27 years old
- The Washington Post's Adam Kilgore reports Lannan is the highest-paid player ever optioned to the minors prior to the end of spring training.
- $5 million salary, final year of contract

#2 Kirby_Waved_At_Me

Kirby_Waved_At_Me

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 611 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 10:28 AM

Is he really much of an improvement over Liam Hendricks and Swarzak? I don't think a trade for Lannan makes sense because of his contract and because it seems like the Nationals want a MLB player or prospects - the rumor about Chicago's interest included Marlon Byrd. Seems like he doesn't justify the cost. Would it make any sense for the Twins to trade Span or Revere? The Twins can't fill the desired need of the Nationals without creating another weak spot for themselves, so I don't think it will happen.

#3 dave_dw

dave_dw

    Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:02 AM

It be kind of fun to collect as many old Nationals players as possible. We've got Capps, Carroll, Willingham, Marquis, & Pavano pitched with Montreal--why not Lannan too? Oh yea, I know why not Lannan...he's not good.

#4 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 7,114 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:41 AM

I don't think that it would cost much to get Lannan from Washington, but I would want them to eat about $4 million of his contract. Is he better than hendriks... maybe... is he better than Swarzak... certainly. I think it's a good idea to consider, but again, I wouldn't give up much for him. He's like Pavano, Marquis, Blackburn... except he's a lefty. Very consistently average.

#5 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 1,959 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:45 AM

Lannan does not strike me as the type of pitcher who would have success in the American League.

#6 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,211 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:50 AM

Is he better than hendriks... maybe... is he better than Swarzak... certainly.


Not really. His Career numbers are: 1.423 WHIP, 4.7 K/9 and 1.4 K/BB in the National League facing pitchers.
Swarzak's as a starter are: 1.451 WHIP, 5.1 K/9, 2.12 K/BB in the American League.
even Duensing as a starter has 1.381 WHIP, 6.0 K/9, 2.33 K/BB

Do you remember Perkins as a starter? Even he was better than Lannan (and he was awful).
So the Twins have many more internal options. I suspect I'd rather see Lannan than Diamond, but that's about it...
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#7 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,705 posts

Posted 06 April 2012 - 12:48 PM

Lannan does not strike me as the type of pitcher who would have success in the American League.


Yeah, I'd pass on him too.