Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Photo

First Round

  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,920 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:37 PM

Ok, am I crazy or is the idea of changing the playoff structure to emphasize the value of the regular season totally undermined when you let the lower seeds have homefield the first two games of the first round? It's insane that Oakland is already in do or die mode and haven't even had a home playoff game yet.

What on earth were they thinking?

#2 greengoblinrulz

greengoblinrulz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,759 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:45 PM

agree 100%
they are goin back to old way next year already

#3 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,506 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:49 PM

I thought the 2-3 format was a mistake when I first read about it and nothing has changed that opinion.

2-2-1 is awkward but it's really the only format that makes sense in a five game series.

#4 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,920 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:56 PM

I hadn't heard about it, it just dawned on me today that they made a change. It's so stupid given all the hype about why they expanded to a second wild card.

#5 Fatt Crapps

Fatt Crapps

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 320 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 08:53 PM

Selig and Co. are a bunch of morons.

#6 Pius Jefferson

Pius Jefferson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 381 posts

Posted 07 October 2012 - 09:32 PM

Overreact much. It's a one year format to avoid a second travel day in the LDS. They go back to the 2-2-1 format next season. Also the format doesn't seem to be hurting the Reds and the Nats have already put themselves in a great position to win their series.

#7 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,052 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 07:01 AM

Selig is an idiot, also the WC game should be a 3 game playoff.

I understand you don't want to go into November for the playoffs...easy solution: Knock the regular season down to a 158 games. Problem solved.

#8 glanzer

glanzer

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 224 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 07:21 AM

I don't see why a 2-2-1 series with the extra travel is such a horrible thing. I have flown on a plane many times before and it really isn't that difficult to sit in a chair for a couple hours. There's no reason why teams can't play on five consecutive days with two flights in between games.

#9 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:34 AM

They were thinking they wanted to get the second wild card card in this season rather than waiting for 2013, but since the 2013 schedule had already been set, the choice was between letting the world series go even deeper into November or use this format for one season only.

I don't think anybody is thrilled with it, but everybody agreed to it, including the players.

#10 SpantheMan

SpantheMan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 120 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:44 AM

While not ideal, that was the only way to make it work. Blame the calendar.

#11 DAM DC Twins Fans

DAM DC Twins Fans

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 476 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:02 PM

I don't see why a 2-2-1 series with the extra travel is such a horrible thing. I have flown on a plane many times before and it really isn't that difficult to sit in a chair for a couple hours. There's no reason why teams can't play on five consecutive days with two flights in between games.


Using this years series as examples--5 games in 5 days works fine for Yanks/Os and maybe Cards/Nats. Not so cool with longer flights for Cincy/Giants and As/Tiggers.

Yes Selig is a complete moron--there is no need for second WC anyway. Just to give BoSox a better shot...go with one WC per league and 3 division champs.

#12 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,132 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 01:52 PM

Yeah the 2-3 format is a one-year deal. Not ideal, but whatever. I love that wild card teams are placed at a significant disadvantage to division winning teams. Any team that doesn't like the single game issue can solve that by winning their division. If you don't do that, you're just lucky to even have a chance to play in the postseason. Next season, they'll be able to change back to the preferred 2-2-1 format for the LDS. so just not a big deal. If the A's were going to lose 2 games in Detroit, they were going to have to win all 3 in Oakland anyway... might as well do it 3 straight.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#13 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,920 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 09:20 PM

Yeah the 2-3 format is a one-year deal. Not ideal, but whatever. I love that wild card teams are placed at a significant disadvantage to division winning teams. Any team that doesn't like the single game issue can solve that by winning their division. If you don't do that, you're just lucky to even have a chance to play in the postseason. Next season, they'll be able to change back to the preferred 2-2-1 format for the LDS. so just not a big deal. If the A's were going to lose 2 games in Detroit, they were going to have to win all 3 in Oakland anyway... might as well do it 3 straight.


I'm annoyed by this "logic" because I keep hearing people say it and it just doesn't hold up once you go into any depth of thought. Again - the hype about the wildcard is "now it matters to win the division in the regular season!" and then they promptly strip that advantage to give the lower seeds the first home games. If there wasn't an advantage to starting a series at home - you wouldn't do it. But there clearly is and it was clearly earned by the higher seeds. So in the very season in which the league itself is promoting an emphasis on regular season success they strip one perk of that success away?

It's stupid. The league controls scheduling, this could have been fixed without this hypocritical result.

#14 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,506 posts

Posted 09 October 2012 - 06:52 AM

Okay, enough calling Selig names. We know many of you don't like him but it's still against the rules.

#15 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,821 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:13 AM

I thought Billy Beane had an interesting take on the new wildcard rules. Of course, he said this in mid-summer, before the As locked up the division outright

"I think you're like me in that you subscribe to the idea that there is some randomness to the playoffs," he said. "That randomness is more pronounced the smaller the sample. The beauty for a team with a $55 million payroll playing a $170 million payroll is our risk is a lot less and our reward is a lot greater. A one-game playoff is going to help the weakest team and the lowest payroll."