Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Photo

Sox move Liriano to the pen

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 gmarais66

gmarais66

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 127 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 09:15 AM

Hmmm... Does this sound familiar? I'm glad he's Chicago's problem now...

http://www.twincitie...rce=most_viewed

#2 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 09:22 AM

I don't know that anybody should be surprised at this. Liriano has always started slow, peaked in June and July, and tapered off in the last part of the season. That's why I'm glad we moved him when we did, even if it was for a pittance. Better something than nothing.

#3 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 7,251 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:05 AM

Yeah, even if Eduardo Escobar is "only" a 4-6 year utility guy for the Twins, it was the right thing to deal Liriano. Pedro Hernandez certainly has a chance to be a back-of-the-rotation starter as early as sometime next year.

#4 Top Gun

Top Gun

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,253 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:07 AM

I bet he beats the Twins Friday nite!

#5 YourHouseIsMyHouse

YourHouseIsMyHouse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,235 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:11 AM

Great deal in hindsight even though we all hated it at the time.

#6 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,093 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:13 AM

Yeah, even if Eduardo Escobar is "only" a 4-6 year utility guy for the Twins, it was the right thing to deal Liriano. Pedro Hernandez certainly has a chance to be a back-of-the-rotation starter as early as sometime next year.


It's going to be tricky for Hernandez to navigate his way through that back-of-the-rotation logjam the Twins have.

#7 snepp

snepp

    Curve Hanger

  • Twins Moderators
  • 4,141 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:28 AM

It's going to be tricky for Hernandez to navigate his way through that back-of-the-rotation logjam the Twins have.


The Twins will have to run a 10 man rotation to make use of all that talent.

#8 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    Old Geezer

  • Members
  • 1,332 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:01 AM

It's going to be tricky for Hernandez to navigate his way through that back-of-the-rotation logjam the Twins have.


The Twins will have to run a 10 man rotation to make use of all that talent.


Not sure talent is the correct word to use.

#9 chuchadoro

chuchadoro

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 107 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:14 AM

Pedro Hernandez certainly has a chance to be a back-of-the-rotation starter as early as sometime next year.


Anybody with one arm and a pulse has a chance to be a back-of-the-rotation starter for the Twins next year.

#10 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,632 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:51 AM

Yeah, even if Eduardo Escobar is "only" a 4-6 year utility guy for the Twins, it was the right thing to deal Liriano. Pedro Hernandez certainly has a chance to be a back-of-the-rotation starter as early as sometime next year.


Escobar's already used two option years. If he's with the Twins after 2013, it either means he has been unexpectedly productive and the Twins never needed to demote their utility player, or he was so bad, no other teams want to claim him.

#11 70charger

70charger

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,121 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 02:59 PM

Great deal in hindsight even though we all hated it at the time.



Not all of us. Is it too early for an "I toldja so"? :P

#12 J-Dog Dungan

J-Dog Dungan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 659 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 03:08 PM

Great deal in hindsight even though we all hated it at the time.



Not all of us. Is it too early for an "I toldja so"? :P

Nope. Not at all.

#13 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,914 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 03:15 PM

Can we still pay Liriano three years and thirty million just out of dedication to his "ace"ness?

#14 twinzgrl

twinzgrl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 150 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 05:34 PM

I was hoping a new venue might help him get his act together...guess not.

#15 one_eyed_jack

one_eyed_jack

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 590 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 05:36 PM

And to think of all hyperventilating in the wake of that trade and silly talk about how much more we should have been able to get for him.

He's the same player he's always been. He'll tease you with glimpses of greatness, but inevitably let you down when it counts.

This performance will always epitmoize Liriano to me:
http://www.baseball-...200809260.shtml

2008. We had just swept the Whities at the Dome, the last win coming in dramatic walk-off fashion against Jenks. One series to go, 3 at the Dome against the light-hitting Royals. A series win puts us in the postseason. Liriano was our starter for the first game of that series, and he got shelled. At home. By one of the weakest lineups in the league. Momentum gone, took the wind right out of our sails. He comes through there, and there's no need for a game 163.

#16 Oxtung

Oxtung

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,430 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:15 PM

How Liriano has pitched has no bearing on whether or not the trade was a good decision. That's like saying the Twins should have traded Justin Morneau after 2009 because he got hurt in 2010. The only thing that matters when evaluating a trade is what was known about the player leading up to the trade.

#17 70charger

70charger

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,121 posts

Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:02 PM

How Liriano has pitched has no bearing on whether or not the trade was a good decision. That's like saying the Twins should have traded Justin Morneau after 2009 because he got hurt in 2010. The only thing that matters when evaluating a trade is what was known about the player leading up to the trade.


That's actually very true. Which means that, regardless of the whining over the return we got for Liriano, we should be glad that we made the decision to get that bad pitcher off of our roster. Of course, the validation ex post helps.

#18 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 12 September 2012 - 06:48 AM

How Liriano has pitched has no bearing on whether or not the trade was a good decision. That's like saying the Twins should have traded Justin Morneau after 2009 because he got hurt in 2010. The only thing that matters when evaluating a trade is what was known about the player leading up to the trade.


And what was known about Liriano before the trade was that his pitching ability tended to be unstable, never being able to maintain his brief moments of success more than a couple of months.

#19 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,008 posts

Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:22 AM

Should be interesting to see what kind of market Liriano has during the offseason.