Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Recent Blogs

Photo

Article: Trade Flatline

  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 1,860 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:25 PM

You can view the page at http://www.twinsdail...-Trade-Flatline

#2 James Richter

James Richter

    Member

  • Members
  • 83 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:08 PM

...no trade is better than a bad trade.

After watching Bill Smith over the last few years, nobody should understand that better than Twins fans.

#3 greengoblinrulz

greengoblinrulz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,759 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:14 PM

just get ready for TRyan to talk about the Aug waiver trades that can be made......am/was a fan of his the first run, but just think the game 'may' have passed him by. Conservative approach/not lovin youth combo is gonna leave this franchise in ruins

#4 LastOnePicked

LastOnePicked

    Member

  • Members
  • 60 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:31 PM

There's always the element of what we couldn't see during the negotiations, but I don't begrudge fans for worrying that the same brain trust/scouting crew who brought us Nishioka might not have had a good sense of what offers included truly good ballplayers. With a bit of a prospect logjam in the outfield, trading an outfielder wouldn't likely have hurt the future, and it seems odd that no one was offering value for Span or Willingham. Fans have lost trust in the Twins FO, and for very good reasons.

#5 BrentMpls

BrentMpls

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 175 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:41 PM

the same brain trust/scouting crew who brought us Nishioka


For what its worth, I heard Ryan on the radio a few weeks back talking specifically about the scouting process for Nishi, saying that when 'they' went back to the tapes, 'they' still see a guy that they want and feel confident about the offer that was made. For whatever reason that guy never made the trip across the ocean.

Clearly it was a huge failure, but it was interesting to hear that comment.

#6 BrentMpls

BrentMpls

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 175 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:45 PM

It stinks to see the trend of getting nothing for the players the team deals continue, but in the case with Liriano I don't think there was much more that could be done. And its amazingly bad timing that Pavano and especially Capps go down on the DL when they did. The stinkage continues as the thing I think everybody wants to feel (I know I do) is that the club is making moves to turn things around, even if its holding out hope on some solid A and AA prospects, but so far nothing has really happened since 99 losses outside of Willingham. Doumit and Carroll have been great too, but they are temporary fixes that play multiple positions. We need to have people locked down in their roles, and, obviously, get some pitching. Now the wait for possible waiver moves begins, but I wouldn't count on that too much - I think winter meetings is the next likely step for a possible move in the right direction. Thats a long time to wait for the chance of a hope that maybe 2014 wont be terrible. Tough times.

#7 Mchans24

Mchans24

    Member

  • Members
  • 86 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 12:07 AM

I guess the game passed him by when he signed Willingham, burton, Doumit and carrol?

#8 Moistache

Moistache

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 12:46 AM

I'm sure the Sox fans will have as much fun with Frankie as we've had the last several years (poor souls). As fun as it is to witness Liriano's (rare) glorious moments, I can't believe how many fans forget his countless, grotesque starts (his most recent for the Twins, a shining example). Considering that our offense (which had a pathetic April) is currently 6th in the league in both hits and OBP, I'm guessing that this is one of the more potent units we've had in some time (if only we can improve on our "clutch"). It's understandable to be a bit optimistic about our chances in the near future for these reasons. In addition, our overtaxed bullpen (currently 3rd in innings pitched amongst all league bullpens) is cheap and decent. There is nothing worse than going all in on a bullpen guy (Fuentes, Capps). It's far easier to focus exclusively on starting pitching in the offseason as opposed to trying to replenish lost position players that are both competent and cap-friendly (Morneau/Mauer aside), in addition to starting pitching. Writing off Liriano, Pavano, Capps, and Bakes gives us at least some wriggle room to sign 2 actual pitchers this offseason.

#9 Top Gun

Top Gun

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,253 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 01:15 AM

It's a bull**** excuse and you know it. They could have sign Liriano long ago. If Span and Willy arn't wanted they could trade Buxton and Hicks. Parmelee instead of Justin. They can't even move a infielder for crying out loud!

#10 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 6,895 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 01:27 AM

I guess the game passed him by when he signed Willingham, burton, Doumit and carrol?


Yeah, this concept that Terry Ryan (or Mike Radcliff or the Twins scouts) are in over their heads and the game has passed them by is really a weak one. The game is the same. The scouting is the same. What they're looking for is the same. These guys are good, and they get the game and how it works to incredible detail. I have full confidence in Terry Ryan and Mike Radcliff. I don't know if they will be able to bring a World Series title, because that isn't something that's predictable, but I have full confidence that they'll get the Twins back to competing for division titles and into the playoffs, and once in the playoffs, see what happens.

I just think that teams are so not willing to deal prospects, even for really good players. Ryan fully understands the need to build from within to sustain success, and so do all the other GMs.

#11 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,373 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 05:23 AM

It's a bull**** excuse and you know it. They could have sign Liriano long ago. If Span and Willy arn't wanted they could trade Buxton and Hicks. Parmelee instead of Justin. They can't even move a infielder for crying out loud!


Buxton was drafted less than two months ago. He can't be traded for over ten more months.

But hey, we shouldn't let those pesky rules get in the way of making completely nonsensical moves that destroy the franchise long-term.

#12 twinswon1991

twinswon1991

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 256 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 05:26 AM

Yeah, this concept that Terry Ryan (or Mike Radcliff or the Twins scouts) are in over their heads and the game has passed them by is really a weak one. The game is the same. The scouting is the same. What they're looking for is the same. These guys are good, and they get the game and how it works to incredible detail. I have full confidence in Terry Ryan and Mike Radcliff. I don't know if they will be able to bring a World Series title, because that isn't something that's predictable, but I have full confidence that they'll get the Twins back to competing for division titles and into the playoffs, and once in the playoffs, see what happens.

I just think that teams are so not willing to deal prospects, even for really good players. Ryan fully understands the need to build from within to sustain success, and so do all the other GMs.



I think the game has changed considerably and Ryan/Radcliff will need to adjust big-time to be successful. You hit the nail on the head that teams are no longer willing to give up top prospects for good middle relievers or average big league bats. Because of this, the successful teams are the ones that draft and develop. Pulling off some good trades and strong international signings supplement the draft/develop aspect. It seems that the Twins have done a very poor job the last 10 years drafting and developing and now that they can't find a stupid GM to give them great MiLB prospects for their vets I hope TR realizes that he/they need to do a much better job drafting/developing than they have over the last 10 years or the franchise will be the new/old Pirates.

#13 mk

mk

    Member

  • Members
  • 62 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:51 AM

Totally agree with "no trade is better than a bad trade." Remember Johan Santana, Matt Garza, J.J. Hardy, Wilson Ramos, etc?

#14 Fire Dan Gladden

Fire Dan Gladden

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 382 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:55 AM

Finally an article on the front page showing a little bit of reason. So many ignorant overactions to the FO and the perceived lack of activity or intelligence.

#15 MWLFan

MWLFan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 197 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:00 AM

You have to love over reaction Wednesday. The day when the message boards whip around more then a tilt a whirl ride at the state fair with a three 17 year old boys in it. Very few moves made at the trade deadline make much of a difference in the scope of a season, some actually hurt a team. Frankie is gone, if most people had heard that this trade had been made two months ago I think they would have been giddy that we stuck the White Sox with him and got a couple of warm bodies in return. In typical former "Franchise" mode he rattled off some good games and made our ADD fan base forget how bad he truely was and how that really lead to the awful season we are stuck in right now. As far as the other "trades" not happening, as the Stones remind us Time is on our Side. Sano, Buxton, Rosario and company will not be ready for a couple more years so the arms can come in this winter to join them in A or AA ball or if we are lucky maybe join Hicks and Arcia in AAA. Does this mean we will be in the crapper next year too, maybe. But it takes awhile to rebuild a baseball system, more so then a football or basketball team. Different beasts. Chill folks. 2012 was not going to get better and 2013 can still be improved upon in the winter.

#16 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Cynical Oldie

  • Members
  • 3,419 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:00 AM

there's one very important point to keep in mind: no trade is better than a bad trade.

When there's nothing good to talk about, I guess we can always resort to platitudes .... and while this is correct, it's not much comfort.

#17 Fire Dan Gladden

Fire Dan Gladden

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 382 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:16 AM

You have to love over reaction Wednesday. The day when the message boards whip around more then a tilt a whirl ride at the state fair with a three 17 year old boys in it. Very few moves made at the trade deadline make much of a difference in the scope of a season, some actually hurt a team. Frankie is gone, if most people had heard that this trade had been made two months ago I think they would have been giddy that we stuck the White Sox with him and got a couple of warm bodies in return. In typical former "Franchise" mode he rattled off some good games and made our ADD fan base forget how bad he truely was and how that really lead to the awful season we are stuck in right now. As far as the other "trades" not happening, as the Stones remind us Time is on our Side. Sano, Buxton, Rosario and company will not be ready for a couple more years so the arms can come in this winter to join them in A or AA ball or if we are lucky maybe join Hicks and Arcia in AAA. Does this mean we will be in the crapper next year too, maybe. But it takes awhile to rebuild a baseball system, more so then a football or basketball team. Different beasts. Chill folks. 2012 was not going to get better and 2013 can still be improved upon in the winter.


Voices of reason? Posting comments?? Where is all the fire and brimstone?

When the Twins a strong in a couple of years, I hope that all the naysayers will post videos on Youtube eating crow. (But I know they won't).

#18 sorney

sorney

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 134 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:17 AM

No gnews is good gnews says Gary Gnus.

#19 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,011 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:57 AM

It's a bull**** excuse and you know it. They could have sign Liriano long ago. If Span and Willy arn't wanted they could trade Buxton and Hicks. Parmelee instead of Justin. They can't even move a infielder for crying out loud!

Lol yes, let's trade a top prospect like Hicks for the hell of it, or Parmelee who has next to zero value since he doesn't get any major league playing time.

That will fix things!

#20 savvyspy

savvyspy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 107 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:15 AM

It's a bull**** excuse and you know it. They could have sign Liriano long ago. If Span and Willy arn't wanted they could trade Buxton and Hicks. Parmelee instead of Justin. They can't even move a infielder for crying out loud!


"No trade is better than a bad trade" is the weakest defense of this mess. By definition when you are the worst team in the majors doing nothing is malpractice. You can't be worse than this team is from a pitching and player development standpoint. You can't continue to say we aren't going to do anything at the trfade deadline because we're afraid we're going to make a bad trade then turn around and say signing free agents is "chasing your tail" like Ryan said yesterday.

This is nothing but incompetence. Pure and simple.

#21 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,373 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:19 AM

"No trade is better than a bad trade" is the weakest defense of this mess. By definition when you are the worst team in the majors doing nothing is malpractice.


If this was 2011, I'd completely agree with you. The Twins were sitting on a handful of departing free agents and did very little with any of them until the waiver deadline.

This season was different. There was Liriano and that's it. The rest of the team (non-DL edition) is signed through multiple seasons. There wasn't a good reason to make trades if teams weren't willing to part with equitable value. Those players will still be available to trade this offseason or next July.

Fans need to take a deep breath and realize that baseball franchises are not fixed overnight. The Twins are not the Cubs, loaded with bad contracts and departing players. Their tradable assets are valuable and signed long-term. The front office needs to get value from them and if other teams aren't willing to give back good players in return, you hold onto those assets until the market is in your favor.

#22 savvyspy

savvyspy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 107 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:19 AM

Voices of reason? Posting comments?? Where is all the fire and brimstone?

When the Twins a strong in a couple of years, I hope that all the naysayers will post videos on Youtube eating crow. (But I know they won't).


But I want to know what your definition of "when the Twins are strong" is. If you are talking about winning playoff series and going to a World Series then I will gladly eat crow on Youtube. If you are talking about patching together a team that edges the Tigers at the end of the season to win the weakest division in baseball and gets swept by the Yankees, then we don't agree on what a "strong" baseball team is.

#23 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,885 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:32 AM

I would say at least with some of these guys "trading just to trade" isn't quite accurate. There are very valid reasons why dealing Span, Willingham, and Burton now would have been prudent. We probably won't know until the word gets out about what was offered, but those three have significant red flags about sustaining their current pace. If we got offers anywhere near a "sell high" value we may have made a serious mistake holding on to them.

#24 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,696 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 09:33 AM

Of all the non-moves yesterday, I'm most disappointed that we didn't move Burton. Span has been pretty consistent when healthy and Willingham's contract is so good that it didn't make sense trading him unless someone overpaid. But Burton is a bit of journeyman having a career year and the Twins have a bunch of potential bullpen arms (heck, it might help Hendriks to pitch out of the pen for a month before starting again, ala Santana or Liriano). I know he's cheap but it would have been nice if he could have brought back something. Oh well, I expect Ryan will make some offseason moves.

#25 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,622 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 09:43 AM

I just think that teams are so not willing to deal prospects, even for really good players. Ryan fully understands the need to build from within to sustain success, and so do all the other GMs.


But the other GM's learned this FROM Ryan. Early this century, the Twins were always hailed as the model franchise of building from within and not giving away your top guys for rentals. Now every other GM has pretty much adopted the same philosophy and Ryan has lost his advantage when it comes to this stratagy.

#26 DPJ

DPJ

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 636 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 09:54 AM

But the other GM's learned this FROM Ryan. Early this century, the Twins were always hailed as the model franchise of building from within and not giving away your top guys for rentals. Now every other GM has pretty much adopted the same philosophy and Ryan has lost his advantage when it comes to this stratagy.


NTM the drafting and development of players has taken a nose dive.

#27 boney

boney

    Member

  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 09:59 AM

I understand not making a trade yesterday if the offers weren't there but I don't want to hear the same thing after this offseason. At the end of the day it's not about how much you tried to get something done. Terry Ryan has shown this year that he can still find a bargain, what he has to prove next is that he can still make a deal. I don't want to see a trade just for the sake of a trade but I would like to know that I have a GM/front office of a bad team that can take advantage of guys like Span,Perkins, and Willingham being at their peak value.

#28 old nurse

old nurse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,673 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:18 AM

I understand not making a trade yesterday if the offers weren't there but I don't want to hear the same thing after this offseason. At the end of the day it's not about how much you tried to get something done. Terry Ryan has shown this year that he can still find a bargain, what he has to prove next is that he can still make a deal. I don't want to see a trade just for the sake of a trade but I would like to know that I have a GM/front office of a bad team that can take advantage of guys like Span,Perkins, and Willingham being at their peak value.


Print a copy of Nygard's top 50 prospects. In a few years see where the players are at. You can trade players for prospects, but will they develop into better players than what you had? In the meantime you have to field a team. A competitive team is preferable to an outfield with Hosken Powell and Willie Norwood. If they had traded outfielders, there would not be adequate replacements. Two years from now maybe. Perkins might be replaceable but I don't think there was even a b type player offered. The current minor leagues have plenty of c players in the lower levels.

#29 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 1,860 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:24 AM

I would say at least with some of these guys "trading just to trade" isn't quite accurate. There are very valid reasons why dealing Span, Willingham, and Burton now would have been prudent. We probably won't know until the word gets out about what was offered, but those three have significant red flags about sustaining their current pace. If we got offers anywhere near a "sell high" value we may have made a serious mistake holding on to them.


There's some truth to this point but the thing to keep in mind is that the pressure to trade at the deadline was not on the Twins – it was on the teams they were talking to. If the desperation of loading up for the stretch run didn't prompt opposing GMs to overpay, then there's little harm in waiting. It's possible the value of guys like Willingham and Burton will drop significantly in the next two months but probably not.

#30 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,373 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:29 AM

There's some truth to this point but the thing to keep in mind is that the pressure to trade at the deadline was not on the Twins – it was on the teams they were talking to. If the desperation of loading up for the stretch run didn't prompt opposing GMs to overpay, then there's little harm in waiting. It's possible the value of guys like Willingham and Burton will drop significantly in the next two months but probably not.


Yep. The Twins were in a position of power this deadline and it takes two to tango. If the other side of the table isn't willing to offer up quality for quality, you hold on to your assets. They're the ones who are in a position of weakness and have an immediate need to improve, not the Twins. The Twins can hold on to their chips for another day when conditions are more favorable.

Would anyone here have been happy with what the Giants gave up for Pence? I sure wouldn't. What they gave up wasn't much more than what the Twins got for Liriano.