Posted 07 April 2014 - 09:00 AM
Assuming $30 isn't your life savings , it's just a fun thing to do.
As for whether you're an idiot, I don't know you well enough -- but Mark DeRosa is telling me to go ahead and vote yes.
While extremely unlikely, $30 to win $5,400 sounds like a reasonable risk/reward. Not an idiot at all.
Posted 07 April 2014 - 11:04 AM
If (or maybe I should say when) you win, I am assuming a significant portion of your winnings will be contributed to TwinsDaily.com to help it to continue to evolve into on of the premier webpages on the world wide web.
A portion (all?) of the potential winnings have already been committed to the "Get DeRosa out of Retirement Foundation".
Posted 07 April 2014 - 11:12 AM
And then Auburn won the national title and he won like $4k.
Posted 07 April 2014 - 12:01 PM
Is it wrong I was ready with my answer before I even clicked on the thread to see why?
This! Exactly this!
But I voted no. As a moderator I feel I need to, ahem, 'set an example,' and can't really approve of calling anyone an idiot, whether there is any validity to it or not.
Posted 08 April 2014 - 08:29 AM
If you'd had a 'Why not' button, I woulda gone for it. Might still...
Anyway, central to the beauty of the game is that it's 162, and who gets hot at the right time. Don't forget injuries... I have a Barves fan crying in my beer right now. Even have an El Birdo buddy who put $5 on the Twins to win it all this year.
Over the course of a long season, crazy stuff happens- even good stuff. Witness the 2012/2013 BoSox. Or, the 86/87 Twins...
Edited by BigTrane, 08 April 2014 - 08:34 AM.
Posted 08 April 2014 - 09:42 AM
Im guessing the odds on the Twins winning it in 91 after finishing dead last in 90 were also pretty poor.
Nolasco is our Jack Morris?
Now all we need is DeRosa to be our Chilli Davis and we will be there!
Posted 08 April 2014 - 04:49 PM