Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Forums

Twins heading back to WCCO

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 03:23 AM
According to a Phil Miller article in the Strib, the Twins will be heading back to WCCO in 2018.    http://www.startribu...adio...

How do you build the 2018 Twins? What formula works for you?

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:43 PM
This is not an attempt at a blueprint, per say. Rather, it's more of an approach idea, and what approach you would take if you were in ch...

Article: The (Temporary) Luxury Of The Best Defender On E...

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:37 PM
Everyone around here knew it already, but now, Byron Buxton has the hardware and national recognition to firmly solidify his rep. Not onl...

Article: The Lost Ones

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 09:46 PM
Trying to pretend like your word is your bondBut until you do right, all you do will go wrongNow some might mistake this just for simple...

Article: Three Bagger: Darvish, Marte & Otani

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:37 PM
Even though it is the offseason, the Twins have been making news. Last week, Byron Buxton and Brian Dozier were honored for their outstan...

Photo

Post Hoc, October 8, 2017

Posted by ashburyjohn , 08 October 2017 · 539 views

Not that anyone asked, but in the past day or so I posted in these Twins Daily threads...
  • Who, besides Robbie Grossman himself, deserves credit for Grossman's improved defensive stats in the outfield, as well as improvement in the eye-test according to yours truly? My general recollection has been less wandering about in search of fly balls. If Jeff Pickler is in charge of coaching the outfielders, kudos to him. Now, about Buxton banging repeatedly into center field walls...
  • On a post-season broadcast, Matt Vasgersian reportedly opined that managers should not be allowed to add check-swings as another call that can be appealed. I agree. When the automated strike zone becomes a reality, the cameras presumably will be able to track the bat head's progress (or lack) across the plate area. Until that day, stopping the game for such appeals is not a good investment of time.
  • Sheesh, Jacque Jones. That's how you treat someone you were close to? To paraphrase another's wisdom, can't we all just get along?
  • If surgery is needed for Sano's aching leg, I'd vote for proceeding ASAP. While caution is medically advisable, it's also likely that his conditioning regimen is suffering at present.


  • Hosken Bombo Disco likes this



Photo
Hosken Bombo Disco
Oct 09 2017 09:44 AM
1. Pickler to Grossman: "Go stand where I told you, about 5 to 10 feet from the foul line, and only chase balls towards the line. Don't chase anything hit further into the field of play." Sounds about right. :) I think it can work.

2. Makes too much sense. If the bat barrel (or any of the bat) enters the strike zone, call it a swing. Perfectly fair. I think there would be many more check swing strikes. My gut sense tells me that batters get more leeway than they deserve. Maybe more strikes means faster games, for the "make games faster" crowd.

3. Ugly

4. Unfortunate.

Wasn't there a fifth? Asking for a friend.
Photo
ashburyjohn
Oct 09 2017 10:49 AM

5. Personal to Chief: Were you born cranky, or did you have to work at it?

 

(Expecting the reply from him to be "yes.")

I thought I heard someone say on air that the rulebook doesn't really clearly call out how a "checked swing" works.. it can be the wrists, it can be the bat head crossing the plate, it can be the bat breaking the parallel with the front of the plate..

 

I did a quick scan of the rules and didn't find any detail.

Photo
ashburyjohn
Oct 10 2017 05:42 PM

I thought I heard someone say on air that the rulebook doesn't really clearly call out how a "checked swing" works.. it can be the wrists, it can be the bat head crossing the plate, it can be the bat breaking the parallel with the front of the plate..

 

I did a quick scan of the rules and didn't find any detail.

Fun question. Closest I can come is (2017 version) "Rule 8.02[c] Comment". It makes repeated use of the term "half swing". This term shows up nowhere else in the rules. Lacking any specific definition, common sense would tell me that a line perpendicular to the batter should be imagined, and if the bat goes beyond this, then it's a swing. Since the batter normally is squared away and is astride the plate, this would have the bat cross no more than half the plate. But if the stance is different, the bat might cross or not cross the plate at the halfway point.

Photo
ashburyjohn
Oct 11 2017 07:03 AM

Stew Thornley is not an MLB ump, of course, but he checked the case book for me and "there is stuff on appealing a half swing but nothing on what a half swing is. So the best answer is, "I know it when I see it,"