Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Forums

Yorman Landa Not Tendered a 2017 Contract

Twins Minor League Talk Today, 06:18 PM
The hard-throwing, 22-year-old becomes a free agent.    He didn't pitch after mid-July due to a shoulder injury. I'm told that...
Full topic ›

Arbitration Decisions - All 5 Tendered Contracts

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 06:18 PM
Yesterday I wrote about the five arbitration situations with the Twins.   The deadline for determining whether or not to tender cont...
Full topic ›

FanGraphs: Top 24 Twins Prospects

Twins Minor League Talk Today, 06:07 PM
FanGraphs today post their top 24 Twins prospects rankings.   Lots that I would disagree with, but it's a fun list, and it contains...
Full topic ›

Wellington Castillo

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 06:07 PM
Surprise non tender. Would have been the PERFECT guy for the Twins to get. This is a great example on why it's foolish to sign mediocre t...
Full topic ›

Article: Dozier Trade Talk Heating Up?

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 03:05 PM
If history is any indication, then our likelihood of seeing the first trade executed by Minnesota's reconfigured front office within the...
Full topic ›
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email


Where Should Payroll Sit in 2013?

Attached Image: baseball.JPG Since they moved into Target Field, the Twins have seen payroll rise and fall, from $96 million in the opening season, up to $112 million the following year, down to $94 million in 2012.

The rise to $112 million last year was purportedly the result of a push to take the next step after falling short in the 2010 postseason. The subsequent scaling back by nearly $20 million was easy enough to figure; the Twins had lost 99 games which led to reduced revenue and also led to a lessened belief that contention in the next year would be possible.
[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]
Revenues only dropped further here in 2012, as Target Field saw attendance fall by nearly 400,000. The Twins also lost 96 games. So the general belief is that next year's payroll will drop again, perhaps to $90 million or lower. Terry Ryan has backed up that notion by telling reporters that he doesn't plan to pursue high-profile free agents, which may either be a sign that he's uncomfortable giving big-money long-term deals to pitchers (justifiable) or that the club is simply unwilling to spend on the open market to address its issues (less justifiable).

Can the Twins really afford to worry so much about what they can afford?

A drop to $90 million or below might make sense based on the organization's typical structure, which calls for putting between 50-52 percent of revenue back into payroll, but it doesn't necessarily make sense for the long-term health of the franchise. If the Twins keep trimming the money they put into their roster, they risk further frustrating the fans and continuing this disturbing trend of attendance decline here in Year Four of their sparkling young ballpark.

There's a snowball effect that comes into play here. If the team's performance keeps scuffling as the shiny newness of the stadium wears off, then attendance will keep dropping and so will revenue. Alas, adherence to the set payroll structure will result in an ongoing decline in spending, which will make it increasingly difficult to field a truly competitive team, particularly with $23 million every year owed to Joe Mauer, who is only getting older.

It might require them to find money elsewhere and go above their normal percentage, but I believe the Twins should absolutely raise payroll above its current level rather than letting it drop for a second straight year. They don't necessarily need to get back into that $115 million range, but $100 million seems like a reasonable target.

While additional spending hardly guarantees a winning team, it does demonstrate to fans a firm commitment to righting the ship, and the extra players brought aboard with that money are bound to generate excitement and sell some tickets.

This is a pivotal offseason for the Twins, and one that could very well determine the course of the organization over the next several years. Will ownership play it safe at the risk of exacerbating a sense of apathy among the fan base, or will they green-light some bold moves to give their stagnating product a jolt?

The latter option wouldn't be very Twins-like. But maybe that's a good thing.


  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

0 Comments