Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Forums

Does everyone think the Twins are going about this right?

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:41 PM
This is going to be a long diatribe about what, in my opionion is the best way to re-build (in this day and age of Major League Baseball)...
Full topic ›

Arcia as breakout hitter & Gibson as breakout pitcher

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:05 PM
ESPN has a blog about breakout hitters for 2015 and Arcia is listed as #5 - Gibson is listed as #9 for breakout pitchers. I can't say tha...
Full topic ›

Predict your 2015 Twins All-star(s)

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 10:33 PM
Who do you think will make an all star appearance for the Twins in 2015? My first thought actually was Arcia breaking out and beating a w...
Full topic ›

Fangraphs: Twins may have weakened a weakness

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 10:28 PM
http://www.fangraphs...ned-a-weakness/ I found this article very well written, and from a guy who doesn't appear to care about the Twins,...
Full topic ›

Article: Projecting Payroll: 2015

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 08:22 PM
When the Twins opened Target Field in 2010, they did so with a $97 million payroll. This was the highest payroll the Twins have had by a...
Full topic ›

Rock the Vote: Twins Top Pitchers of All-Time

Attached Image: Joe Nathan.jpg
On Tuesday, many of us voted. Maybe your candidate won. Maybe not. But here at Twins Daily, we also voted for the Top 10 Twins Hitters of All-Time. Generally speaking, the top three players were the same on most ballots. It was also interesting to see how people chose to vote 6-10.

Today, I will present a group of twelve of the best pitchers in the Twins 52 year history. You can see how long each spent with heir Twins, how many innings they pitched and how well they performed. Each is pretty good, but the choice is yours.

Put your ballot in the comments section, ranking them 1-10. In a couple of days, we’ll be sure to tally the votes and see how these pitchers rank.

With that, here are a couple of charts looking at the top Twins pitchers statistically. These lists are alphabetical so as not to provide any bias.
[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]


[TABLE="width: 432"]
[TR]
[TD]Player[/TD]
[TD]Yrs w/Twins[/TD]
[TD]W-L (S)[/TD]
[TD]ERA[/TD]
[TD]ERA+[/TD]
[TD]WHIP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rick Aguilera[/TD]
[TD]1989-1999[/TD]
[TD]40-47 (254)[/TD]
[TD]3.50[/TD]
[TD]130[/TD]
[TD]1.18[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bert Blyleven[/TD]
[TD]1970-76, 1985-88[/TD]
[TD]149-138[/TD]
[TD]3.28[/TD]
[TD]119[/TD]
[TD]1.19[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dave Goltz[/TD]
[TD]1972-1979[/TD]
[TD]96-79[/TD]
[TD]3.48[/TD]
[TD]112[/TD]
[TD]1.31[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mudcat Grant[/TD]
[TD]1964-1967[/TD]
[TD]50-35[/TD]
[TD]3.35[/TD]
[TD]107[/TD]
[TD]1.21[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jim Kaat[/TD]
[TD]1961-1973[/TD]
[TD]190-159[/TD]
[TD]3.34[/TD]
[TD]110[/TD]
[TD]1.23[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Joe Nathan[/TD]
[TD]2004-2011[/TD]
[TD]24-13 (260)[/TD]
[TD]2.16[/TD]
[TD]204[/TD]
[TD]0.96[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Camilo Pascual[/TD]
[TD]1961-1966[/TD]
[TD]88-57[/TD]
[TD]3.31[/TD]
[TD]113[/TD]
[TD]1.22[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jim Perry[/TD]
[TD]1963-1973[/TD]
[TD]128-90[/TD]
[TD]3.15[/TD]
[TD]113[/TD]
[TD]1.20[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brad Radke[/TD]
[TD]1995-2006[/TD]
[TD]148-139[/TD]
[TD]4.22[/TD]
[TD]113[/TD]
[TD]1.26[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Johan Santana[/TD]
[TD]2000-2007[/TD]
[TD]93-44[/TD]
[TD]3.22[/TD]
[TD]141[/TD]
[TD]1.09[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kevin Tapani[/TD]
[TD]1989-1995[/TD]
[TD]75-63[/TD]
[TD]4.06[/TD]
[TD]108[/TD]
[TD]1.27[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Frank Viola[/TD]
[TD]1982-1989[/TD]
[TD]112-93[/TD]
[TD]3.86[/TD]
[TD]111[/TD]
[TD]1.30[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


As you can see, I did include two closers in the analysis. They certainly stand out compared to other relievers. So, how will you vote for them relative to the starters. It’s also fun to see the Adjusted ERA (ERA+) from the various eras. Johan Santana’s 3.22 ERA during the first eight seasons of this millennium shows an ERA+ of 141 while Jim Perry’s 3.15 ERA through the ‘60s and early ‘70s is ‘just’ a 113 ERA+.


[TABLE="width: 376"]
[TR]
[TD]Player[/TD]
[TD]WAR[/TD]
[TD]Innings[/TD]
[TD]Walks:Strikeouts[/TD]
[TD]K/9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rick Aguilera[/TD]
[TD]14.6[/TD]
[TD] 694[/TD]
[TD]179:586[/TD]
[TD]7.6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bert Blyleven[/TD]
[TD]46.3[/TD]
[TD] 2,566[/TD]
[TD]674:2,035[/TD]
[TD]7.1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dave Goltz[/TD]
[TD]22.5[/TD]
[TD] 1,638[/TD]
[TD]493:887[/TD]
[TD]4.9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mudcat Grant[/TD]
[TD]5.0[/TD]
[TD] 780[/TD]
[TD]163:377[/TD]
[TD]4.3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jim Kaat[/TD]
[TD]27.2[/TD]
[TD] 3,014[/TD]
[TD]729:1,851[/TD]
[TD]5.5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Joe Nathan[/TD]
[TD]17.8[/TD]
[TD] 463[/TD]
[TD]134:561[/TD]
[TD]10.9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Camilo Pascual[/TD]
[TD]16.9[/TD]
[TD] 1,284[/TD]
[TD]431:994[/TD]
[TD]7.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jim Perry[/TD]
[TD]24.2[/TD]
[TD] 1,883[/TD]
[TD]541:1,025[/TD]
[TD]4.9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brad Radke[/TD]
[TD]42.6[/TD]
[TD] 2,451[/TD]
[TD]445:1,467[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Johan Santana[/TD]
[TD]34.0[/TD]
[TD] 1,308[/TD]
[TD]364:1,381[/TD]
[TD]9.5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kevin Tapani[/TD]
[TD]17.8[/TD]
[TD] 1,171[/TD]
[TD]255:724[/TD]
[TD]5.6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Frank Viola[/TD]
[TD]25.0[/TD]
[TD] 1,772[/TD]
[TD]521:1,214[/TD]
[TD]6.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


So how important are the number of innings pitched to you in your rankings? In other words, how does Santana’s or Nathan’s dominance over less innings compare to the longevity of pitchers like Kaat and Blyleven? How important is the strikeout statistic to you? In other words, Santana and Nathan are clearly the most dominant pitchers on this list, but the numbers that guys like Perry and Goltz put up while barely striking out a batter every other inning are also incredible. It also speaks to the era they pitched in, when hitters took pride in not striking out.

So, what does your Top 10 list look like? I’ll post mine in the Comments section, but be sure to have your voice heard!


  • Share:
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

0 Comments