Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Forums

Hicks for Murphy trade: 14 months later

Other Baseball Today, 01:50 PM
Murphy: nowhere to be found Hicks: .318 Ba, 3 HR, 1.100 OPS Oops!
Full topic ›


Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 01:37 PM
Why on earth is he starting multiple games for a team that is currently in a playoff spot of the season ended today?
Full topic ›

Article: Game Thread: Twins@Cleveland, 6/24@3:10pm CT

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 01:35 PM
Good Afternoon everyone! (well morning time where you are  ) This is my first time writing up a game thread so I hope you like it. A...
Full topic ›

Adopt-A-Prospect 2017 Draft Day 3 (starts now)

Adopt A Prospect 2017 Today, 01:23 PM
Here is a quick update of which players have been adopted:   NIck Burdi - Steve Lien Stephen Gonsalves - gocgo LaMonte Wade - goulik...
Full topic ›

Fun with Numbers: 2017 edition

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 12:12 PM
Twins on pace to win 162 games this season. Twins team ERA on pace to be 1.0 Sano on pace to hit 162 home runs. Santana on pace to have t...
Full topic ›

Just Because It’s a Cliché Doesn’t Mean It’s Not True

This was originally posed at Knuckleballsblog.com.

I’m not sure any sport has spawned more clichés than baseball. Right now, though, even clichés that are applicable to multiple sports seem to make me think of the Twins.

Posted Image

As I’ve been following the the team lately, I keep hearing various clichés in my mind (“look the ball in to your glove, Nishi.” “Make sure of one, Nishi.”). A lot of them come to mind, however, as I reflect on the entirety of the Twins’ season.

Plenty of discussion in Twinsville recently has revolved around the fact that the Twins’ record since mid-May has been respectable… even slightly above .500 perhaps, depending upon when you start to measure those games in your cherry-picking exercise. I tend to think that kind of exercise is best reserved for the lonely off-season when you're trying to find hope for the future. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]However, I do declare there were times when I was so lonesome I took some comfort there. (Pardon that obscure Simon & Garfunkel reference. I've been thinking I could probably write an entire post equating being a Twins player to "The Boxer". Another time, perhaps.)

The problem with this cherry-picking, of course, is that Major League Baseball has determined that the schedule shall begin in early April and that games played in April and May count toward each team’s overall record. All the games count the same.

Which brings me back to clichés and just a few that seem to be appropriate to mention at this time, if for no other reason than to serve as a reminder to us… and the Twins… that the games played next April should perhaps be treated with more respect.

It’s a long season.

*Sigh* Yeah… there’s still a lot of season left. Especially when the only suspense left by mid August is whether your team is going to end up losing 100 games.

Every team will win 54 games and every team will lose 54 games. It’s what you do with the other 54 games that matters.

I was tempted to leave this one out. First of all, I don't believe clichés should involve doing math.

More than that, though, I’m kind of afraid that someone in the Twins organization might take the “every team will win 54 games” part as a challenge and try to disprove it.

You can’t win a Championship in April, but you can lose one.

Yeah. This one we’re certainly familiar with, aren’t we?

It’s not how you start a season that matters; it’s how you finish it.

I call “bull****”.

You need to take the first two months of the season to figure out which adjustments need to be made.

Isn't this what Spring Training is for? Regardless, it really shouldn’t take you two months to figure out that your starting pitching absolutely sucks and try someone else.

There’s plenty of time left, no need to panic.

If the Opening Day starting pitcher next year gets pounded and can’t survive 4 innings, I think it will be perfectly acceptable for Twins fans to commence to panic.

In fact, if the Opening Day starting pitcher is ANY pitcher already part of the Twins organization today, I don’t think we should even be required to wait until the first pitch of the season is thrown before starting to panic.

You can’t rush to judgment.

It’s been two years of absolute failure. Unless significant changes are made, concluding that the 2013 Twins are a bad team on or before Opening Day would not be considered "rushing" to anything.

You have to take it one game at a time.

This is true… but God, that’s often SO painful.

Pitching and defense win championships.

Maybe this is true, maybe it isn’t. But I think the Twins have adequately demonstrated that bad pitching and bad defense does mean no championships, so maybe Terry Ryan should at least give this cliché a little credence.

They’re a better team than their record indicates.

I do think the Twins, right now, are a better team than their record indicates, so maybe this cliché is true at times.

I don’t think it matters, though, because what IS absolutely true is that a team’s record determines where they fall in the standings. So if you give me a choice between a team that’s better than their record indicates or not as good as their record indicates (see: Orioles... or even perhaps the Twins most of the past decade) I’ll take the latter every time. After all, you play to win the game! (how’s that for a cliché?)

They’re still missing a few pieces to the puzzle.

Funny thing about puzzles. If you’re missing corner pieces, it’s sometimes tough to even get to the point where you can figure out which other pieces you’re missing.

The Twins are missing some corner pieces.

There’s a lot of season left.

*Sigh* Yeah… it’s a long season.

- JC

  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email