Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Forums

Article: Not-So-Premium Velocity

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:39 PM
Not so long ago, hard-throwing pitchers were in high demand. As triple-digit readings became increasingly common, the Minnesota Twins not...
Full topic ›

Article: Official Winter Meetings Monday Thread

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:29 PM
Today, the Winter Meetings officially begin. There was an awards banquet on Sunday night, but the full slate of meetings begin today.Use...
Full topic ›

What does your *perfect* Brian Dozier trade look like?

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:27 PM
Here's what mine would look like. How about yours?   http://coldomaha.com...n-dozier-trade/
Full topic ›

My Top Ten Twins for CTTP

Twins Minor League Talk Today, 10:39 PM
As some of you know, I write for two places, one a Braves site, Tomahawk Take, the other a general baseball site, Call To The Pen. I'm cu...
Full topic ›

Mike Napoli

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 09:49 PM
In Darren Wolfson's latest podcast, he reported that the Twins have expressed interest in Mike Napoli. He is not someone I had pictured o...
Full topic ›
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email


Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

Attached Image: USATSI_7418983.jpg Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million in the Offseason Handbook. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).

Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However according to Fangraphs.com, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar. What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

Of course, one of the biggest concerns of teams making these sizable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly trunk and thigh).
Attached Image: NolascovGarza.png 1500ESPN.com's Darren Wolfson tweeted out today that the Twins were not in pursuit of Garza at the requested four-year rate, sticking firm to a potential two-year deal after signing Nolasco, Phil Hughes and Mike Pelfrey. Still, the question that will undoubtedly arise from Twins fans is -- should they have targeted Garza instead of Nolasco?


  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

0 Comments