Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Forums

Lurkers and rookies please post here

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 02:42 AM
I am opening this thread for the people who visit Twins Daily but have not yet posted on any of the forums. If you have not yet register...
Full topic ›

Is Deduno getting a fair shake?

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 12:43 AM
OK, for some this ship has sailed for various reasons. And I get it. And I know some will blast me for even bringing this topic back up....
Full topic ›

Article: Kurt Suzuki Signs Extension With Twins

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 11:20 PM
Up against the trade deadline and facing limited interest from other teams, the Minnesota Twins signed a last minute contract extension w...
Full topic ›

Your Lineup/rotation The Rest Of The Way

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:42 PM
The Twins obviously aren't going to be making a playoff push, so what regular lineup and rotation would you like to see from here on out...
Full topic ›

Game Thread: Twins @ Pale Hose, 8/1 @ 7:10pm CT

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:11 PM
Game-time forecast: Partly cloudy with a 50-percent chance of rain. Winds blowing in from right field at 5-10 m.p.h. Temperature aro...
Full topic ›

The Store

Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

Attached Image: USATSI_7418983.jpg Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million in the Offseason Handbook. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).

Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However according to Fangraphs.com, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar. What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

Of course, one of the biggest concerns of teams making these sizable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly trunk and thigh).
Attached Image: NolascovGarza.png 1500ESPN.com's Darren Wolfson tweeted out today that the Twins were not in pursuit of Garza at the requested four-year rate, sticking firm to a potential two-year deal after signing Nolasco, Phil Hughes and Mike Pelfrey. Still, the question that will undoubtedly arise from Twins fans is -- should they have targeted Garza instead of Nolasco?


  • Share:
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

0 Comments