Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Forums

Stop What You Are Doing And Watch Byron Buxton

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 01:10 AM
Byron Buxton is pretty good at defense, that much is true. Check out the coverage on this catch here:      It doesn't see...
Full topic ›

Game Thread: Twins @ Royals, 6:15pm CDT 9/29/2016 AD

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 12:24 AM
Once more into the breach! The good thing about baseball is that there is another game to try to win. We got 2 1 run losses in a row. B...
Full topic ›

Fangraphs (and other national publications) on the Twins

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 09:56 PM
I'm just going to post here whenever they do an article on the Twins.   Today, they have one on Trevor May (noting some changes in s...
Full topic ›

Complete Games

Other Baseball Yesterday, 09:56 PM
So we're rumbling along at 82 CG in all of MLB this year.   Here are some of the excuses I've heard over the past x amount of years...
Full topic ›

2016 Game Thread Volunteers Needed!

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 10:23 PM
It's almost time...the 2016 season will be on us before we know it. Like last year, we're asking game thread fans to help us out by start...
Full topic ›
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Twins Blogosphere


Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

Attached Image: USATSI_7418983.jpg Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million in the Offseason Handbook. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).

Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However according to Fangraphs.com, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar. What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

Of course, one of the biggest concerns of teams making these sizable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly trunk and thigh).
Attached Image: NolascovGarza.png 1500ESPN.com's Darren Wolfson tweeted out today that the Twins were not in pursuit of Garza at the requested four-year rate, sticking firm to a potential two-year deal after signing Nolasco, Phil Hughes and Mike Pelfrey. Still, the question that will undoubtedly arise from Twins fans is -- should they have targeted Garza instead of Nolasco?


  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

More From MinnCentric

0 Comments