Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Forums

Article: Twins Minor League Report (9/1): Polanco Hot; E-...

Twins Minor League Talk Today, 11:07 PM
Happy Labor Day!Still a lot of meaningful activity going on as the minor league regular season comes to a close. The Twins were led to a...
Full topic ›

Article: Twins Promote Eight for September

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:07 PM
The Minnesota Twins announced that they will promote eight players from AAA Rochester for September. In recent days, we have seen the Twi...
Full topic ›

Article: Twins Geek Challenges Twins Daily's Writers

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 11:26 PM
As part of my ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, I'm challenging all Twins Daily, all Vikings Journal writers and my podcast partner, Aaron Gleema...
Full topic ›

A Suggestion by Souhan

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 10:40 PM
Jim Souhan posted four moves he'd make right now if he was in charge.  What say you to each?   I give the first three (especial...
Full topic ›

Adam Brett Walker II - 2014

Adopt A Prospect 2014 Today, 10:12 PM
[COLOR=#222222][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=3]Adam Brett Walker II - DOB 10/18/1991 (22)[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=3...
Full topic ›

The Store


Recent Blogs

Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

Attached Image: USATSI_7418983.jpg Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million in the Offseason Handbook. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).

Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However according to Fangraphs.com, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar. What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

Of course, one of the biggest concerns of teams making these sizable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly trunk and thigh).
Attached Image: NolascovGarza.png 1500ESPN.com's Darren Wolfson tweeted out today that the Twins were not in pursuit of Garza at the requested four-year rate, sticking firm to a potential two-year deal after signing Nolasco, Phil Hughes and Mike Pelfrey. Still, the question that will undoubtedly arise from Twins fans is -- should they have targeted Garza instead of Nolasco?


  • Share:
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email


0 Comments