Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Forums

Article: Three Twins Breakout Candidates For 2018

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 09:35 PM
During every season, there are players who figure something out and take the next step. It can be a pitcher finally gaining command of a...
Full topic ›

Article: Why I Believe The Twins Are Going To Sign Yu Dar...

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 09:34 PM
Call it a hot take. I'm fine with that. It's been cold out, and the frozen state of affairs this offseason is only deepening the chill.Bu...
Full topic ›

Article: Not So Fast: Is Eddie Rosario Already Losing a S...

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 07:26 PM
Eddie Rosario had a huge breakout year in 2017, posting career highs in virtually every offensive category, but he also saw his defensive...
Full topic ›

Non-Twins Offseason Rumors

Other Baseball Today, 06:11 PM
Mostly from Heyman's twitter.   Profar for Harvey swap being discussed Yankees trying to trade for Gerritt Cole but Pirates say they...
Full topic ›

Article: Each Minnesota Team’s Greatest Finish

Minnesota Twins Talk Today, 09:13 PM
If you’re like a lot of Minnesota sports fans, your adrenaline might still be pumping from the Vikings’ thrilling last second win on Sund...
Full topic ›

Twins Blogosphere


Brewers sign Garza to deal similar to Twins' Nolasco

Attached Image: USATSI_7418983.jpg Sources indicate that the Milwaukee Brewers have now signed pitcher Matt Garza to the tune of four years, $52 million.

This is notable for several reasons. The first being that this is a substantial savings from what he was originally projected as being worth going into the free agent season. At Twins Daily, we estimated that Garza would reach five years and $75 million in the Offseason Handbook. Instead, teams shied away from him. The second interesting piece is that this deal is basically the same one that the Twins gave starter Ricky Nolasco earlier in the winter (4 years, $49M + options).

Comparatively, Garza, who is a year younger than Nolasco, has had a slightly better career. However according to Fangraphs.com, since 2010, the pair has been surprisingly similar. What you see is that while the raw numbers are very alike, Garza gets better marks for his ERA, xFIP and FIP for spending time in the American League while Nolasco has been in the National League.

Of course, one of the biggest concerns of teams making these sizable investments is how a player will hold up over the course of that agreement. In Nolasco’s case, he has been rock solid over his career meanwhile Garza has been in-and-out of infirmaries for arm-related ailments (Nolasco’s have been mainly trunk and thigh).
Attached Image: NolascovGarza.png 1500ESPN.com's Darren Wolfson tweeted out today that the Twins were not in pursuit of Garza at the requested four-year rate, sticking firm to a potential two-year deal after signing Nolasco, Phil Hughes and Mike Pelfrey. Still, the question that will undoubtedly arise from Twins fans is -- should they have targeted Garza instead of Nolasco?


  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

0 Comments