Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Forums

Look How Far Our Minor League Has Come

Twins Minor League Talk Yesterday, 11:25 PM
This is what MLB had ranked as our top 10 in 2001.     http://mlb.mlb.com/m...ts/watch/y2011/   Hicks is still a major que...
Full topic ›

Article: Bullpen Calculus

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 11:25 PM
After yesterday’s crazy day at Fort Myers, today was considerably more serene. It also served as a deep breath before the last big push f...
Full topic ›

Article: Tommy Milone Is Tommy Milone

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 11:01 PM
I've been calling the 5th starter outings "tryouts," which sort of implies they count for something. It's not totally clear they do.Tommy...
Full topic ›

Reusse on Arcia

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 09:23 PM
http://www.startribu.../297601151.html   Reusse brings up some questions about Arcia -   "Molitor hasn’t flat-out said it, and...
Full topic ›

Article: Extension Candidate: Oswaldo Arcia

Minnesota Twins Talk Yesterday, 08:57 PM
What?! You're joking. Right?We've hashed, rehashed and triple-hashed a potential extension for Brian Dozier. We've even thrown Trevor Plo...
Full topic ›
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email


Assessing Hellickson

Attached Image: hellickson.jpg The Rays, possessing a glut of quality starting pitchers and seeking an outfielder who can be an asset at the top of the order, have been pointed at frequently around here as a logical trade partner for the Twins. The Offseason Handbook specifically calls out James Shields and Wade Davis as potential targets in Tampa's pitching corps, and there are several other names that hold appeal.

According to reports, the Rays hurler drawing the most interest is Jeremy Hellickson. This isn't surprising. He carries plenty of value as a young right-hander with a 3.06 career ERA and the 2011 AL Rookie of the Year trophy on his shelf. On the surface, he has the makings of a long-term top-of-the-rotation fixture.
[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]
A deeper look, however, would suggest that Hellickson has been performing over his head to some degree in his first couple big-league seasons, making him a risky proposition for a Twins team that can ill afford to whiff on a major trade.

I'm a big proponent of K/BB ratio as an indicator of a pitcher's outlook, and although his core numbers have been excellent Hellickson has simply been underwhelming in this category, with a 1.84 ratio in his first two full seasons. His success thus far has been buoyed to a large degree by a low BABIP and a high strand rate. There's plenty of data indicating that neither of those factors can be consistently controlled by a pitcher in the long haul.

None of this is to suggest that Hellickson isn't a good pitcher. He's very good. He was an elite prospect before joining the major-league ranks and for the most part you don't put up the kind of numbers he has as a 24/25-year-old in the AL East through sheer luck. I'm fully willing to believe that his game is tailored to produce quality numbers without big strikeout rates. His 9.8 K/9 rate in the minors even suggests that he's got some upside yet in the strikeout department despite a 6.1 mark in his first 400 MLB innings.

But the Rays will justifiably be shopping him as a young star pitcher under team control for several years, and as such, they'll be demanding a sizable ransom. In my view, he's been performing at his ceiling and has much more room for regression than improvement going forward. I see him as a solid middle-of-the-rotation guy much more than a legitimate No. 1 or 2.

That's certainly not a guy the Twins should be shying away from adding, but at what cost? Terry Ryan and Co. would be much better off identifying a talented pitcher with strong peripherals who has been underperforming and can be acquired at a discount, as opposed to Hellickson who embodies the flip side of that coin.


  • Share:
  • submit to reddit
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

More From MinnCentric

0 Comments